The uplift and denudation history of the orogenic belt and the basin–mountain coupling process have directly or indirectly affected the generation, scale, and preservation of sandstone-type uranium deposits in the eastern Junggar Basin by controlling the uranium source, lithology, facies, hydrogeology, post-generation modification, and other mineralization conditions. Taking the eastern Junggar Basin as the research area, this study proposes the constraints on sandstone-type uranium deposits by the tectonic uplift and denudation history of the orogenic belt in the basin using the apatite fission track (AFT), detrital zircon geochronology, and other methods. The results of the AFT age test and thermal path simulation indicate that the orogenic belt in the eastern Junggar Basin underwent four rapid uplifts; (from approximately 300 Ma to approximately 250 Ma, from approximately 130 Ma to approximately 90 Ma, from approximately 65 Ma to approximately 30 Ma, and from approximately 20 Ma to 0 Ma). Moreover, the timing of the uplift has a spatial trend of gradually becoming younger from south to north. The detrital zircon U-Pb age test showed that the sediment source area of the basin is mainly distributed in three age intervals, i.e., 460–390, 360–270, and 190–170 Ma. The comprehensive evaluation of the clastic sediment composition, stratigraphic distribution of the erosion source area, and thermal history showed that a large amount of exposed Carboniferous–Permian granites in the Qinglidi and Karameri Mountain erosion source areas contributed dominant sediment material and uranium sources for the Triassic and Middle and Lower Jurassic strata in the basin. The Ordovician–Early Devonian granites only provided sediment sources for the Upper Triassic and Lower Jurassic strata in the basin. Altay Mountain contributed some sediment sources for the Middle and Upper Jurassic strata after the magmatic activity and rapid uplift occurred in the Middle Jurassic. Based on the comprehensive analysis of the influence of the tectonic uplift process of the orogenic belt and the transformation of material source areas on uranium mineralization, the granites in the erosion source areas are proposed to contribute both external and internal uranium sources for uranium mineralization. Uranium mineralization mainly occurred in the tectonic retreat period after the rapid uplifts of the Cretaceous and Paleogene. It was terminated by the intensive uplift-induced stratigraphic deformation in the Miocene.

The DL deposit is a typical tabular-shaped U deposit hosted in sandstones of the Upper Cretaceous Yaojia Formation in the southwestern Songliao Basin, northeast China. Owing to its recent discovery, the origin of the deposit remains unclear. In this study, mineralogical and geochemical data were used to constrain the genesis of the DL deposit. Two sources of U were recognized: (1) pre-ore U enrichment in the Yaojia Formation during diagenesis; and (2) the provenance of the Yaojia Formation, which comprises late Permian–Early Cretaceous granitic rocks from the southern Great Xing’an Range and northern margin of the North China Craton, rather than the oils and diabase dikes in the study area. Mineralogical and geochemical characteristics indicate that organic matter (OM) in the Yaojia Formation was derived mainly from plant debris and hydrocarbons. In situ S isotope data for pyrite from the ore-bearing sandstones show that most of the pyrite has similar δ³⁴S values (−43.8‰ to −20.6‰) to those of pyrite associated with bacterial sulfate reduction (BSR). The pyrite is often typically replaced and/or overgrown by pitchblende, which has a high P₂O₅ content (0.07–1.64 wt.%), indicative of a genetic relationship between BSR and U mineralization. The geological, mineralogical, and geochemical features suggest that the U mineralization in the DL deposit was mainly associated with BSR.

Sandstone-type uranium deposits hold significant value and promise within China’s uranium resource portfolio, with the majority of these deposits found at the junctions of basins and mountains within Mesozoic and Cenozoic basins. The Kamust uranium mining area, located in the eastern part of the Junggar Basin, represents a significant recent discovery. Prior research on this deposit has been confined to two-dimensional analyses, which pose limitations for a comprehensive understanding of the deposit’s three-dimensional characteristics. To address the issue of uranium resource reserve expansion, this study employs 3D geological modeling and visualization techniques, guided by uranium deposit models and mineral prediction methods. First, a 3D model database of the Kamust uranium deposit was constructed, comprising drill holes, uranium ore bodies, ore-controlling structures, interlayer oxidation zones, and provenance areas. This model enables a transparent and visual representation of the spatial distribution of favorable mineralization horizons, structures, stratigraphy, and other predictive elements in the mining area. Second, based on the three-dimensional geological model, a mineral prediction model was established by summarizing the regional mineralization mechanisms, ore-controlling factors, and exploration indicators. Combined with big-data technology, this approach facilitated the quantitative analysis and extraction of ore-controlling factors, providing data support for the three-dimensional quantitative prediction of deep mineralization in the Kamust uranium deposit. Finally, using three-dimensional weights of evidence and three-dimensional information-quantity methods, comprehensive information analysis and quantitative prediction of deep mineralization were conducted. One prospective area was quantitatively delineated, located east of the Kalasay monocline, which has been well-validated in geological understanding. The research indicates that the area east of the Kalasay monocline in the Kamust mining district has significant exploration potential.

The southwestern Tarim Basin, shaped by the far-field effects of the India-Eurasia collision, serves as a critical archive for reconstructing source-to-sink dynamics and tectonic evolution in a Cenozoic intracontinental foreland setting. This study presents detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology and trace element data from sands of the Yulongkash and Karakash Rivers, major tributaries of the Hotan River draining the West Kunlun Orogenic Belt. Our results reveal distinct provenance signatures between the two tributaries: Yulongkash river sands (HT1) exhibit dominant Triassic (~208 Ma) and Early Paleozoic (~418 Ma) zircon populations, sourced primarily from the South Kunlun and Tianshuihai terranes, whereas Karakash river sands (MY1) are characterized by Early Paleozoic (~460 Ma) and Precambrian zircons, reflecting predominant contributions from the North Kunlun Terrane. Integration with published datasets highlights systematic spatial variations in detrital zircon age spectra, controlled by bedrock heterogeneity, fluvial geomorphology, and sediment mixing efficiency. Furthermore, crustal thickness reconstructions based on zircon trace elements constrain the terminal closure of the Proto-Tethys Ocean to ~420–440 Ma (peak crustal thickness: ~80 km) and the Paleo-Tethys Ocean to the Late Triassic (~210 Ma). These findings not only refine the provenance framework of the Hotan River drainage system but also provide critical insights into the timing of Tethyan ocean closures and the tectonic evolution of the West Kunlun Orogenic Belt, emphasizing the utility of detrital zircon records in deciphering orogenic histories within complex intracontinental settings.

《地球科学》(ISSN 1000-2383;CN42-1874/P) (原刊名《地球科学——中国地质大学学报》ISSN 1000-2383;CN42-1233/P)，创刊于1957年，是由教育部主管、中国地质大学主办的综合性地学学术理论期刊，月刊，2015年改名为《地球科学》,她以反映中国地质大学教学与科研最新的、高水平的基础地质、应用地质、资源与环境地质及地学工程技术研究成果为主要任务。