Frontal circuits play a critical role in motor, cognitive and affective processing, and their dysfunction may result in a variety of brain disorders. However, exactly which frontal domains mediate which (dys)functions remains largely elusive. We studied 534 deep brain stimulation electrodes implanted to treat four different brain disorders. By analyzing which connections were modulated for optimal therapeutic response across these disorders, we segregated the frontal cortex into circuits that had become dysfunctional in each of them. Dysfunctional circuits were topographically arranged from occipital to frontal, ranging from interconnections with sensorimotor cortices in dystonia, the primary motor cortex in Tourette’s syndrome, the supplementary motor area in Parkinson’s disease, to ventromedial prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Our findings highlight the integration of deep brain stimulation with brain connectomics as a powerful tool to explore couplings between brain structure and functional impairments in the human brain.

Deep Brain Stimulation can improve tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, and axial symptoms in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Potentially, improving each symptom may require stimulation of different white matter tracts. Here, we study a large cohort of patients (N = 237 from five centers) to identify tracts associated with improvements in each of the four symptom domains. Tremor improvements were associated with stimulation of tracts connected to primary motor cortex and cerebellum. In contrast, axial symptoms are associated with stimulation of tracts connected to the supplementary motor cortex and brainstem. Bradykinesia and rigidity improvements are associated with the stimulation of tracts connected to the supplementary motor and premotor cortices, respectively. We introduce an algorithm that uses these symptom-response tracts to suggest optimal stimulation parameters for DBS based on individual patient’s symptom profiles. Application of the algorithm illustrates that our symptom-tract library may bear potential in personalizing stimulation treatment based on the symptoms that are most burdensome in an individual patient.

Deep brain stimulation is an effective treatment for Parkinson’s disease but can be complicated by side-effects such as cognitive decline. There is often a delay before this side-effect is apparent and the mechanism is unknown, making it difficult to identify patients at risk or select appropriate deep brain stimulation settings. Here, we test whether connectivity between the stimulation site and other brain regions is associated with cognitive decline following deep brain stimulation. First, we studied a unique patient cohort with cognitive decline following subthalamic deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease (n = 10) where reprogramming relieved the side-effect without loss of motor benefit. Using resting state functional connectivity data from a large normative cohort (n = 1000), we computed connectivity between each stimulation site and the subiculum, an a priori brain region functionally connected to brain lesions causing memory impairment. Connectivity between deep brain stimulation sites and this same subiculum region was significantly associated with deep brain stimulation induced cognitive decline (P < 0.02). We next performed a data-driven analysis to identify connections most associated with deep brain stimulation induced cognitive decline. Deep brain stimulation sites causing cognitive decline (versus those that did not) were more connected to the anterior cingulate, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, and cognitive regions of the cerebellum (P_FWE < 0.05). The spatial topography of this deep brain stimulation-based circuit for cognitive decline aligned with an a priori lesion-based circuit for memory impairment (P = 0.017). To begin translating these results into a clinical tool that might be used for deep brain stimulation programming, we generated a ‘heat map’ in which the intensity of each voxel reflects the connectivity to our cognitive decline circuit. We then validated this heat map using an independent dataset of Parkinson’s disease patients in which cognitive performance was measured following subthalamic deep brain stimulation (n = 33). Intersection of deep brain stimulation sites with our heat map was correlated with changes in the Mattis dementia rating scale 1 year after lead implantation (r = 0.39; P = 0.028). Finally, to illustrate how this heat map might be used in clinical practice, we present a case that was flagged as ‘high risk’ for cognitive decline based on intersection of the patient’s deep brain stimulation site with our heat map. This patient had indeed experienced cognitive decline and our heat map was used to select alternative deep brain stimulation parameters. At 14 days follow-up the patient’s cognition improved without loss of motor benefit. These results lend insight into the mechanism of deep brain stimulation induced cognitive decline and suggest that connectivity-based heat maps may help identify patients at risk and who might benefit from deep brain stimulation reprogramming.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus is one of the main advanced neurosurgical treatments for drug-resistant tremor. However, not every patient may be eligible for this procedure. Nowadays, various other functional neurosurgical procedures are available. In particular cases, radiofrequency thalamotomy, focused ultrasound and radiosurgery are proven alternatives to DBS. Besides, other DBS targets, such as the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) or the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRT), may be appraised as well. In this review, the clinical characteristics and pathophysiology of tremor syndromes, as well as long-term outcomes of DBS in different targets, will be summarized. The effectiveness and safety of lesioning procedures will be discussed, and an evidence-based clinical treatment approach for patients with drug-resistant tremor will be presented. Lastly, the future directions in the treatment of severe tremor syndromes will be elaborated.

Tremor is one of the most common neurological symptoms. Its clinical and neurobiological complexity necessitates novel approaches for granular phenotyping. Instrumented neurophysiological analyses have proven useful, but are highly resource-intensive and lack broad accessibility. In contrast, bedside scores are simple to administer, but lack the granularity to capture subtle but relevant tremor features. We utilise the open-source computer vision pose tracking algorithm Mediapipe to track hands in clinical video recordings and use the resulting time series to compute canonical tremor features. This approach is compared to marker-based 3D motion capture, wrist-worn accelerometry, clinical scoring and a second, specifically trained tremor-specific algorithm in two independent clinical cohorts. These cohorts consisted of 66 patients diagnosed with essential tremor, assessed in different task conditions and states of deep brain stimulation therapy. We find that Mediapipe-derived tremor metrics exhibit high convergent clinical validity to scores (Spearman’s ρ = 0.55–0.86, p≤ .01) as well as an accuracy of up to 2.60 mm (95% CI [−3.13, 8.23]) and ≤0.21 Hz (95% CI [−0.05, 0.46]) for tremor amplitude and frequency measurements, matching gold-standard equipment. Mediapipe, but not the disease-specific algorithm, was capable of analysing videos involving complex configurational changes of the hands. Moreover, it enabled the extraction of tremor features with diagnostic and prognostic relevance, a dimension which conventional tremor scores were unable to provide. Collectively, this demonstrates that current computer vision algorithms can be transformed into an accurate and highly accessible tool for video-based tremor analysis, yielding comparable results to gold standard tremor recordings.

Movement disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease, essential tremor, and dystonia, are characterized by their predominant motor symptoms, yet diseases causing abnormal movement also encompass several other symptoms, including non-motor symptoms. Here we review recent advances from studies of brain lesions, neuroimaging, and neuromodulation that provide converging evidence on symptom-specific brain networks in movement disorders. Although movement disorders have traditionally been conceptualized as disorders of the basal ganglia, cumulative data from brain lesions causing parkinsonism, tremor and dystonia have now demonstrated that this view is incomplete. Several recent studies have shown that lesions causing a given movement disorder occur in heterogeneous brain locations, but disrupt common brain networks, which appear to be specific to each motor phenotype. In addition, findings from structural and functional neuroimaging in movement disorders have demonstrated that brain abnormalities extend far beyond the brain networks associated with the motor symptoms. In fact, neuroimaging findings in each movement disorder are strongly influenced by the constellation of patients’ symptoms that also seem to map to specific networks rather than individual anatomical structures or single neurotransmitters. Finally, observations from deep brain stimulation have demonstrated that clinical changes, including both symptom improvement and side effects, are dependent on the modulation of large-scale networks instead of purely local effects of the neuromodulation. Combined, this multimodal evidence suggests that symptoms in movement disorders arise from distinct brain networks, encouraging multimodal imaging studies to better characterize the underlying symptom-specific mechanisms and individually tailor treatment approaches.