Suzana Ilic

Dr. Suzana Ilic


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 September 2009 in The European Physical Journal B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Boris PodobnikBoris Podobnik
Boris Podobnik
IGI. Grosse
I. Grosse
DHDavor Horvatic
Davor Horvatic
SISuzana Ilic
Suzana Ilic
PIP. Ch. Ivanov
P. Ch. Ivanov
HSH. E. Stanley
H. E. Stanley

11 August 2005 in International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KEK. S. Erduran
K. S. Erduran
SISuzana Ilic
Suzana Ilic
VKV. Kutija
V. Kutija

1 June 2014 in Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDavid J. McGovern
David J. McGovern
SISuzana Ilic
Suzana Ilic
AFAndrew Folkard
Andrew Folkard
SMStuart J. McLelland
Stuart J. McLelland
BMBrendan J. Murphy
Brendan J. Murphy
A laboratory flume experiment was performed to investigate the time development of scour around a vertical cylinder acting as a scaled model of an offshore wind turbine monopile in tidal currents. The tidal current was simulated by resolving each half-cycle into three time steps, between which flow velocity and depth were varied. Flow direction was reversed between half-cycles, which were otherwise identical. Between them, the three time steps exhibited clear water, transitional, and live-bed conditions. The experiment was run over two full-simulated tidal cycles. The scour hole formed tended to a symmetrical shape after two half-cycles and was both shallower and slower developing than the scour hole in a unidirectional current test carried out in the same flume. This was due mainly to the variable rates of scour caused by the variable flow conditions within each half-cycle, and to a lesser extent to the infilling of the scour hole when the current direction reversed. The lower scour depth recorded in tidal conditions implies that the amount of scour protection required may be less than previous studies suggest

15 August 2014 in Geo-Marine Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IRIgor Ružić
Igor Ružić
Ivan MarovicIvan Marovic
Ivan Marovic
ČBČedomir Benac
Čedomir Benac
SISuzana Ilic
Suzana Ilic

1 April 2018 in Ocean & Coastal Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KPKristina Pikelj
Kristina Pikelj
IRIgor Ružić
Igor Ružić
SISuzana Ilic
Suzana Ilic
MJMike James
Mike James
BKBranko Kordic
Branko Kordic

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDamjan Bujak
Damjan Bujak
SISuzana Ilic
Suzana Ilic
HMHanna Miličević
Hanna Miličević
DCDalibor Carevic
Dalibor Carevic
Most empirical equations used for wave runup predictions have been developed from measurements at straight sandy beaches in unlimited fetch environments. While there are empirical equations to predict wave runup on gravel beaches, they have not been tested for prediction of wave runup on pocket gravel beaches, in limited-fetch environment, which can be found around Mediterranean. This paper addresses this lack of measurements on this type of beaches and examines the alongshore variability of wave runup. Wave runup measurements were made using video observations along 3 cross-sectional profiles on the pocket beach of Ploče, Croatia. The measurements have shown that the wave runup can vary for about 71% even around the centerline of the pocket beach. This variability is due to beach orientation and alignment of beach profiles to the prevailing wave direction, as well as difference in beach slope. Comparison of wave runup predictions from five well-known empirical equations and field measurements showed significant underprediction (up to NBIAS = −0.33) for energetic wave events, and overall high scatter (up to NRMSE = 0.38). The best performing wave runup equation was used for further refinement outside the original parameter space by including the Goda wave peakedness parameter (Qp). The newly developed empirical equation for wave runup reduced the NBIAS to 0 and the NRMSE by 31% compared to the original equation (developed equation metrics: R = 0.91, NBIAS = 0, NRMSE = 0.2, HH = 0.2 on the study site). This empirical equation can potentially be used for design of coastal structures and artificial beaches in similar environments, but further measurements are needed to test its applicability to a range of forcing and environmental conditions.