This study aims to determine why Korean parents provide adolescent children with continuous physical education through Taekwondo. The Q methodology was applied. The final 25 Q-samples were selected by composing the Q-population. Twenty parents who provided their children with Taekwondo education for more than 10 years were designated as the P-sample. Q-sorting was performed on the P-sample. Centroid factor analysis and varimax rotation were performed using version 2.35 of PQ method program. The study observed four factors with a total explanatory variance of 69%. Types 1 to 4 (N = 5, 7, 5, and 3) pertained to a powerful means of enhancing mental health, the driving force behind stable school life and social development, improvement in psychological and social areas for a successful transition to adulthood, and increased awareness of the values of Taekwondo and importance of physical activity, with eigenvalues of 4.59, 6.42, 3.16, and 1.18 and explanatory variances of 0.16, 0.32, 0.12, and 0.09, respectively. Furthermore, consensus statements for each type were investigated as Q18 and Q17. These findings supported the academic foundation of proper Taekwondo education in adolescence and confirmed it as a powerful means of exerting a positive impact on adulthood.

본 연구는 여성재현의 양상을 페미니즘의 관점에서 분석하고자 하였다. 그 결과 2000년~2018년 사이에 개봉한 스포츠영화 27편에서 성비의 불균형을 확인할 수 있었고, 한국영화, 스포츠영화의 비약적 발전과 성장에 비해 여성재현의 방식에 있어서만은 상대적으로 느린 변화를 보였다는 점을 확인할 수 있었다. 지배적 남성성을 강화하는데 활용된 스포츠영화 속 여성 캐릭터의 유형으로는 크게 두 가지 유형 첫째, ‘보조자’, 둘째, ‘구원받는 자’로 정리해볼 수 있었다. 여기서 ‘보조자’는 ‘모성애적 인물’과 ‘이성애적 인물’이 존재하는데, 이런 여성캐릭터의 경우 남성 주인공들을 위로하고 응원하거나 인간관계에 있어서 징검다리 역할을 주로 했으며, 주인공이 성장하고 꿈을 이루는 과정에 있어 의지할 수 있는 대상이 되거나 극의 재미요소(멜로적 재미)의 필요성에 따라서만 존재하는 모습을 보이기도 했다. ‘구원받는 자’는 현실성을 담보로 여성(수혜자)-남성(구원자)의 구조를 경로 의존적 방식에 따라 수용된 산물로 보였다. 이러한 여성캐릭터들은 스포츠를 하는 영화 속 주인공이면서도 전통적 여성성의 프레임을 크게 벗어나지 못하는 모습으로 영화 속 남자지도자에게 크게 의지하는 모습을 보였다. 결론적으로, 본 연구를 통해 우리는 스포츠영화를 통해 남성중심 이데올로기의 존재를 확인하고 그것이 또 어떻게 설파되고 그 지위를 공고히 해왔는지 들여다보는 시간을 가질 수 있었다. 이러한 작업은 스포츠영화를 향한 비판적 시각의 필요성을 환기시키는 한편 페미니즘적 관점에 대한 관심을 유발하는 계기가 될 것이다.

The purpose of this study was to recognize the seriousness of the problems caused by marina port development project, find the nature of the problems, and suggest alternative direction and solution of them. In order to accomplish the purpose, this study first presumed tha tmarina port development project had been progressed and tried to be demonstrated based on neo-liberalistic policy. Then, this study might find potential solutions regarding the various problems of marina port development project based on neo-liberalistic development policy. As a result, it was known that neo-liberalism in Korea started at first as voluntary movement of the then government but later was set in full course due to internal problems and external pressure, turning into a new form of developmental neo-liberalism. Later, whilet ihad passed through each of the regimes, it has grown to more expanded neo-liberalism through labour flexiiblity, polarization, deregulation, and privatization. Marina port development project was obviously a neo-liberalistic project and promoted as part of entrepreneurial urban strategies. Therefore, marina port development project has brought about damaging public interest, excluding citizens from policy making, and even threatening democracy. It was worth considering deliberative democracy involving participation as an alternative measure. Debate-oriented deliberative democracy could be a key to solving the problems by marina port development project.