Weeds are one of the most damaging biotic stresses in crop production, and drought and salinity are considered the most serious abiotic stresses. These factors harmfully affect growth and development in several vegetable and field crops by causing harmful effects on physiological and biochemical characteristics such as water uptake, photosynthesis, relative water content, electrolyte leakage, and antioxidant compounds linked with oxidative stress and the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). These oxidative stress-related components affect most physiological and biochemical characteristics in plants under natural conditions and environmental stresses, especially weed infestation, salinity, and drought stress. ROS such as superoxide (O₂^•−), hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), peroxyl radical (ROO^•), and singlet oxygen (1O₂) are very important molecules produced naturally as by-products of metabolic processes in chloroplasts, mitochondria, peroxisomes, and the apoplast. Under stress conditions such as weed infestation, drought and salinity, the morphological and yield characteristics of stressed plants are negatively affected; however, superoxide (O₂^•−) and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) are significantly increased. The negative impact of weeds can be mitigated with integrated controls which include herbicides, allelopathy, and crop rotation as well as the different methods for weed control. The defense system in various crops mainly depends on both enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants. The enzymatic antioxidants include superoxide dismutase, glutathione reductase, and catalase; nonenzymatic antioxidants include ascorbic acid, carotenoids, α-Tocopherols, proline, glutathione, phenolics, and flavonoids. These antioxidant components can scavenge various ROS under several stresses, particularly weeds, drought and salinity. In this review, our objective is to shed light on integrated weeds management and plant tolerance to salinity and drought stresses associated with the ROS and the induction of antioxidant components to increase plant growth and yield in the vegetable and field crops.

Sorghum responds to the ingress of the fungal pathogen Colletotrichum sublineolum through the biosynthesis of 3-deoxyanthocyanidin phytoalexins at the site of primary infection. Biosynthesis of 3-deoxyanthocyanidins in sorghum requires a MYB transcription factor encoded by yellow seed1 (y1), an orthologue of the maize gene pericarp color1 (p1). Maize lines with a functional p1 and flavonoid structural genes do not produce foliar 3-deoxyanthocyanidins in response to fungal ingress. To perform a comparative metabolic analysis of sorghum and maize 3-deoxyanthocyanidin biosynthetic pathways, we developed transgenic maize lines expressing the sorghum y1 gene. In maize, the y1 transgene phenocopied p1-regulated pigment accumulation in the pericarp and cob glumes. LC-MS profiling of fungus-challenged Y1-maize leaves showed induction of 3-deoxyanthocyanidins, specifically luteolinidin. Y1-maize plants also induced constitutive and higher levels of flavonoids in leaves. In response to Colletotrichum graminicola, Y1-maize showed a resistance response.

Background: Drought is a major determinant for growth and productivity of all crops, including cereals, and the drought-induced detrimental effects are anticipated to jeopardize world food security under the ongoing global warming scenario. Biostimulants such as humic acid (HA) can improve drought tolerance in many cereals, including maize and sorghum. These two plant species are genetically related; however, maize is more susceptible to drought than sorghum. The physiological and biochemical mechanisms underlying such differential responses to water shortage in the absence and presence of HA, particularly under field conditions, are not fully understood. Results: Herein, the effects of priming maize and sorghum seeds in 100 mg L⁻¹ HA on their vegetative growth and physiological responses under increased levels of drought (100%, 80%, and 60% field capacity) were simultaneously monitored in the field. In the absence of HA, drought caused 37.0 and 58.7% reductions in biomass accumulation in maize compared to 21.2 and 32.3% in sorghum under low and high drought levels, respectively. These responses were associated with differential retardation in overall growth, relative water content (RWC), photosynthetic pigments and CO₂ assimilation in both plants. In contrast, drought increased root traits as well as H₂O₂, malondialdehyde, and electrolyte leakage in both species. HA treatment significantly improved the growth of both plant species under well-watered and drought conditions, with maize being more responsive than sorghum. HA induced a 29.2% increase in the photosynthetic assimilation rate in maize compared to 15.0% in sorghum under high drought level. The HA-promotive effects were also associated with higher total chlorophyll, stomatal conductance, RWC, sucrose, total soluble sugars, total carbohydrates, proline, and total soluble proteins. HA also reduced the drought-induced oxidative stress via induction of non-enzymic and enzymic antioxidants at significantly different extents in maize and sorghum. Conclusion: The current results identify significant quantitative differences in a set of critical physiological biomarkers underlying the differential responses of field-grown maize and sorghum plants against drought. They also reveal the potential of HA priming as a drought-alleviating biostimulant and as an effective approach for sustainable maize and sorghum production and possibly other crops in drought-affected lands.

The sensitivity of rice plants to salinity is a major challenge for rice growth and productivity in the salt-affected lands. Priming rice seeds in biostimulants with stress-alleviating potential is an effective strategy to improve salinity tolerance in rice. However, the mechanisms of action of these compounds are not fully understood. Herein, the impact of priming rice seeds (cv. Giza 179) with 100 mg/L of humic acid on growth and its underlaying physiological processes under increased magnitudes of salinity (EC = 0.55, 3.40, 6.77, 8.00 mS/cm) during the critical reproductive stage was investigated. Our results indicated that salinity significantly reduced Giza 179 growth indices, which were associated with the accumulation of toxic levels of Na⁺ in shoots and roots, a reduction in the K⁺ and K⁺/Na⁺ ratio in shoots and roots, induced buildup of malondialdehyde, electrolyte leakage, and an accumulation of total soluble sugars, sucrose, proline, and enzymic and non-enzymic antioxidants. Humic acid application significantly increased growth of the Giza 179 plants under non-saline conditions. It also substantially enhanced growth of the salinity-stressed Giza 179 plants even at 8.00 mS/cm. Such humic acid ameliorating effects were associated with maintaining ionic homeostasis, appropriate osmolytes content, and an efficient antioxidant defense system. Our results highlight the potential role of humic acid in enhancing salt tolerance in Giza 179.

High-yielding rice cultivars exhibit a great performance in non-saline fields; however, their growth and productivity are greatly reduced in salt-affected lands. Humic acid has a promising stress-mitigating potential and can be effective in improving salt tolerance in salinity sensitive rice cultivars. Herein, seeds of Giza 177 (high-yielding but salt-sensitive rice cultivar) were primed in 40 mg/l humic acid, sown, and maintained. Then growth and physiological responses of the humic acid-primed plants to increased levels of salinity (EC: 0.55, 3.40, 6.77, and 8.00 mS/cm) were evaluated at the reproductive stage. Increasing salinity induced a progressive retardation in plant height, leaf area, fresh and dry weights. Such retardation was associated with Na⁺ buildup in shoot and root, high electrolyte leakage and accumulation of malondialdehyde, total soluble sugars, sucrose, glucose, proline, total soluble proteins, flavonoids, and phenolics. In contrast, salinity reduced K⁺, K⁺/Na⁺ ratio, total carbohydrates, and the activity of catalase, peroxidase, and polyphenol oxidase. Humic acid enhanced growth under non-saline and saline conditions. The humic acid-induced improvement in salt tolerance was associated with the reduction of Na⁺ toxicity, increasing K⁺/Na⁺ ratio, regulating osmolytes concentration, and enhancing the activities of antioxidant enzymes and thus reduce the oxidative stress. These results indicate that humic acid successfully reduced the salinity-induced plant damage, improved metabolism, and maintained active growth of Giza 177 under saline irrigation.

Understanding salt tolerance mechanisms in halophytes is critical for improving the world’s agriculture under climate change scenarios. Herein, the physiological and metabolic responses of Suaeda monoica, Suaeda vermiculata, and Suaeda schimperi against abiotic stress in their natural saline environment on the east coast of the Red Sea were investigated. The tested species are exposed to different levels of salinity along with elemental disorders, including deficiency in essential nutrients (N&P in particular) and/or elevated levels of potentially toxic elements. The tested species employed common and species-specific tolerance mechanisms that are driven by the level of salinity and the genetic constitution of Suaeda species. These mechanisms include: (i) utilization of inorganic elements as cheap osmotica (Na+ in particular), (ii) lowering C/N ratio (S. monoica and S. schimperi) that benefits growth priority, (iii) efficient utilization of low soil N (S. vermiculata) that ensures survival priority, (v) biosynthesis of betacyanin (S. schimperi and S. vermiculata) and (vi) downregulation of overall metabolism (S. vermiculata) to avoid oxidative stress. Based on their cellular metal accumulation, S. monoica is an efficient phytoextractor of Cr, Co, Cu, Ni, and Zn, whereas S. vermiculata is a hyper-accumulator of Hg and Pb. S. schimperi is an effective phytoextractor of Fe, Hg, and Cr. These results highlight the significance of Suaeda species as a promising model halophyte and as phytoremediators of their hostile environments.