One crucial parameter to evaluate the state of the heart after myocardial infarction (MI) is the viability of the myocardial segment, i.e., if the segment recovers its functionality upon revascularization. MRI performed several minutes after the injection of a contrast agent (delayed enhancement-MRI or DE-MRI) is a method of choice to evaluate the extent of MI, and by extension, to assess viable tissues after an injury. The Emidec dataset is composed of a series of exams with DE-MR images in short axis orientation covering the left ventricle from normal cases or patients with myocardial infarction, with the contouring of the myocardium and diseased areas (if present) from experts in the domains. Moreover, classical available clinical parameters when the patient is managed by an emergency department are provided for each case. To the best of our knowledge, the Emidec dataset is the first one where annotated DE-MRI are combined with clinical characteristics of the patient, allowing the development of methodologies for exam classification as for exam quantification.
Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI is the gold standard technique for myocardial viability assessment. Although the technique accurately reflects the damaged tissue, there is no clinical standard to quantify myocardial infarction (MI). Moreover, commercial software used in clinical practice are mostly semi-automatic, and hence require direct intervention of experts. In this work, a new automatic method for MI quantification from LGE-MRI is proposed. Our novel segmentation approach is devised for accurately detecting not only hyper-enhanced lesions, but also microvascular obstruction areas. Moreover, it includes a myocardial disease detection step which extends the algorithm for working under healthy scans. The method is based on a cascade approach where firstly, diseased slices are identified by a convolutional neural network (CNN). Secondly, by means of morphological operations a fast coarse scar segmentation is obtained. Thirdly, the segmentation is refined by a boundary-voxel reclassification strategy using an ensemble of very light CNNs. We tested the method on a LGE-MRI database with healthy (n = 20) and diseased (n = 80) cases following a 5-fold cross-validation scheme. Our approach segmented myocardial scars with an average Dice coefficient of 77.22 ± 14.3% and with a volumetric error of 1.0 ± 6.9 cm. In a comparison against nine reference algorithms, the proposed method achieved the highest agreement in volumetric scar quantification with the expert delineations (p< 0.001 when compared to the other approaches). Moreover, it was able to reproduce the scar segmentation intra- and inter-rater variability. Our approach was shown to be a good first attempt towards automatic and accurate myocardial scar segmentation, although validation over larger LGE-MRI databases is needed.
A thoracic aortic aneurysm is an abnormal dilatation of the aorta that can progress and lead to rupture. The decision to conduct surgery is made by considering the maximum diameter, but it is now well known that this metric alone is not completely reliable. The advent of 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging has allowed for the calculation of new biomarkers for the study of aortic diseases, such as wall shear stress. However, the calculation of these biomarkers requires the precise segmentation of the aorta during all phases of the cardiac cycle. The objective of this work was to compare two different methods for automatically segmenting the thoracic aorta in the systolic phase using 4D flow MRI. The first method is based on a level set framework and uses the velocity field in addition to 3D phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. The second method is a U-Net-like approach that is only applied to magnitude images from 4D flow MRI. The used dataset was composed of 36 exams from different patients, with ground truth data for the systolic phase of the cardiac cycle. The comparison was performed based on selected metrics, such as the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorf distance (HD), for the whole aorta and also three aortic regions. Wall shear stress was also assessed and the maximum wall shear stress values were used for comparison. The U-Net-based approach provided statistically better results for the 3D segmentation of the aorta, with a DSC of 0.92 ± 0.02 vs. 0.86 ± 0.5 and an HD of 21.49 ± 24.8 mm vs. 35.79 ± 31.33 mm for the whole aorta. The absolute difference between the wall shear stress and ground truth slightly favored the level set method, but not significantly (0.754 ± 1.07 Pa vs. 0.737 ± 0.79 Pa). The results showed that the deep learning-based method should be considered for the segmentation of all time steps in order to evaluate biomarkers based on 4D flow MRI.
Ascending aortic aneurysm is a pathology that is important to be supervised and treated. During the years the aorta dilates, it becomes stiff, and its elastic properties decrease. In some cases, the aortic wall can rupture leading to aortic dissection with a high mortality rate. The main reference standard to measure when the patient needs to undertake surgery is the aortic diameter. However, the aortic diameter was shown not to be sufficient to predict aortic dissection, implying other characteristics should be considered. Therefore, the main objective of this work is to assess in-vivo the elastic properties of four different quadrants of the ascending aorta and compare the results with equivalent properties obtained ex-vivo. The database consists of 73 cine-MRI sequences of thoracic aorta acquired in axial orientation at the level of the pulmonary trunk. All the patients have dilated aorta and surgery is required. The exams were acquired just prior to surgery, each consisting of 30 slices on average across the cardiac cycle. Multiple deep learning architectures have been explored with different hyperparameters and settings to automatically segment the contour of the aorta on each image and then automatically calculate the aortic compliance. A semantic segmentation U-Net network outperforms the rest explored networks with a Dice score of 98.09% (±0.96%) and a Hausdorff distance of 4.88 mm (±1.70 mm). Local aortic compliance and local aortic wall strain were calculated from the segmented surfaces for each quadrant and then compared with elastic properties obtained ex-vivo. Good agreement was observed between Young’s modulus and in-vivo strain. Our results suggest that the lateral and posterior quadrants are the stiffest. In contrast, the medial and anterior quadrants have the lowest aortic stiffness. The in-vivo stiffness tendency agrees with the values obtained ex-vivo. We can conclude that our automatic segmentation method is robust and compatible with clinical practice (thanks to a graphical user interface), while the in-vivo elastic properties are reliable and compatible with the ex-vivo ones.
Automated Cardiac Magnetic Resonance segmentation serves as a crucial tool for the evaluation of cardiac function, facilitating faster clinical assessments that prove advantageous for both practitioners and patients alike. Recent studies have predominantly concentrated on delineating structures on short-axis orientation, placing less emphasis on long-axis representations due to the intricate nature of structures in the latter. Taking these consideration into account, we present a robust hierarchy-based augmentation strategy coupled with the compact and fast Efficient-Net (ENet) architecture for the automated segmentation of two-chamber and four-chamber Cine-MRI images. We observed an average Dice improvement of 0.99% on the two-chamber images and of 2.15% on the four-chamber images, and an average Hausdorff distance improvement of 21.3% on the two-chamber images and of 29.6% on the four-chamber images. The practical viability of our approach was validated by computing clinical metrics such as the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular volume (LVC). We observed acceptable biases, with a +2.81% deviation on the LVEF for the two-chamber images and a +0.11% deviation for the four-chamber images.