Mira Vuković

Dr. Mira Vuković

General hospital of Nikea and Piraeus
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 October 2015 in Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mihajlo JakovljevicMihajlo Jakovljevic
Mihajlo Jakovljevic
MVMira Vuković
Mira Vuković
JFJohn Fontanesi
John Fontanesi
Background: Exploration of long-term health expenditure and longevity trends across three major sub-regions of Eastern Europe since 1989. Methods: 24 countries were classified as EU 2004, CIS, or S...

11 February 2016 in Balkan Medical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mihajlo JakovljevicMihajlo Jakovljevic
Mihajlo Jakovljevic
MVMira Vuković
Mira Vuković
CCChia Ching Chen
Chia Ching Chen
MAMirjana Antunovic
Mirjana Antunovic
VSViktorija Dragojevic Simic
Viktorija Dragojevic Simic
TYTetsuji Yamada
Tetsuji Yamada
Serbia, as the largest market of the Western Balkans, has entered socioeconomic transition with substantial delay compared to most of Eastern Europe. Its health system reform efforts were bold during the past 15 years, but their results were inconsistent in various areas. The two waves of global recession that hit Balkan economies ultimately reflected to the financial situation of healthcare. Serious difficulties in providing accessible medical care to the citizens became a reality. A large part of the unbearable expenses actually belongs to the overt prescription of pharmaceuticals and various laboratory and imaging diagnostic procedures requested by physicians. Therefore, a broad national survey was conducted at all levels of the healthcare system hierarchy to distinguish the ability of cost containment strategies to reshape clinician's mindsets and decision-making in practice. Assessment of healthcare professionals' judgment on economic consequences of prescribed medical interventions and evaluation of responsiveness of healthcare professionals to policy measures targeted at increasing cost-consciousness. Cross-sectional study. A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted through a hierarchy of medical facilities across diverse geographical regions before and after policy action, from January 2010 to April 2013. In the middle of the observed period, the National Health Insurance Fund (RFZO) adopted severe cost-containment measures. Independently, pharmacoeconomic guidelines targeted at prescribers were disseminated. Administration in large hospitals and community pharmacies was forced to restrict access to high budget-impact medical care. Economic Awareness of Healthcare Professionals Questionnaire-29 (EAHPQ-29), developed in Serbian language, was used in face-to-face interviews. The questionnaire documented clinician's attitudes on: Clinical-Decision-Making-between-Alternative-Interventions (CDMAI), Quality-of-Health-Care (QHC), and Cost-Containment-Policy (CCP). The authors randomly and anonymously recruited 2000 healthcare experts, with a total of 1487 responding; after eliminating incomplete surveys, 649 participants were considered before and 651 after policy intervention. Dentists (1.195±0.560) had a higher mean CDMAI score compared to physicians (1.017±0.453). The surgical group compared to the internist group had a higher total EAHPQ-29 score, CCP score and CDMAI score. Policy intervention had a statistically significant negative impact on the QHC score (F=4.958; df=1; p=0.027). There was no substantial impact of policy interventions on professional behavior and judgment with regard to the CDMAI, CCP, and total EAHPQ-29 scores. Although cost savings were forcibly imposed in practice, the effects on clinical decision-making were modest. Clinicians' perceptions of quality of medical care were explained in a less effective manner due to the severely constrained resources allocated to the providers. This pioneering effort in the Balkans exposes the inefficiency of current policies to expand clinicians' cost consciousness.

1 August 2012 in Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVMira Vuković
Mira Vuković
BGB.S. Gvozdenović
B.S. Gvozdenović
TGT. Gajić
T. Gajić
BGB. Stamatović Gajić
B. Stamatović Gajić
Mihajlo JakovljevicMihajlo Jakovljevic
Mihajlo Jakovljevic
BMB.P. McCormick
B.P. McCormick

1 April 2013 in The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BGB. S. Gvozdenovic
B. S. Gvozdenovic
VMV. Mihailovic-Vucinic
V. Mihailovic-Vucinic
MVMira Vuković
Mira Vuković
ELE. E. Lower
E. E. Lower
RBR. P. Baughman
R. P. Baughman
MOM. Omcikus
M. Omcikus
To assess the impact of high body mass index (BMI) on patient-reported outcomes in sarcoidosis patients and healthy persons. In this case-control study, we investigated symptoms of fatigue and dyspnoea, health status, BMI and spirometric tests in 184 sarcoidosis patients and the same number of sex- and age-matched healthy subjects. Fatigue was assessed using the fatigue scale (FS), dyspnoea was determined by the baseline dyspnoea index (BDI) and health status was measured using the respiratory-specific St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). There were significantly more subjects with increased BMI (≥25 kg/m(2)) among the sarcoidosis patients than among the healthy volunteers ((2) 37.675, P < 0.01). Sarcoidosis patients also had a greater probability of having a higher BMI (P < 0.01, OR 1.18, 95%CI 1.071.3). We found significantly lower BDI scores and forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity, as well as higher total SGRQ and total FS scores in sarcoidosis patients than in healthy individuals (P < 0.01 for all differences). Sarcoidosis significantly reduces patients' health status, both independently and also due to increased BMI. Reduction in BMI may contribute to improved spirometry results and health status of patients with sarcoidosis.

1 January 2018 in Vojnosanitetski Pregled
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GMGordana Markovic-Petrovic
Gordana Markovic-Petrovic
MVMira Vuković
Mira Vuković
AJAleksandra Jovic-Vranes
Aleksandra Jovic-Vranes
Background/Aim. Accreditation is considered to be the oldest and most widespread mechanism of independent external evaluation of health care quality and is implemented in over 70 countries worldwide. Despite numerous studies in this field, there is still no solid evidence about its impact on health care quality and patient safety. The goal of this paper was to investigate if the accreditation process has an effect on the difference in values of health care quality indicators. Methods. The study was conducted in two tertiary level health care hospitals, one accredited, the other non-accredited. Values of seven quality indicators in the period before, during and immediately after the completion of accreditation (from 2007?2015), which measure health care quality, patient safety, the efficiency and productivity of the institution, were compared. Results. Of the seven monitored quality indicators, a positive effect of the accreditation process can be attributed to a shorter length of waiting for the first scheduled health check at the institution, shorter length of waiting for the first scheduled surgical check, lower rate of patients with decubitus as well as a decrease of the rate of hospital days per patient with acute myocardial infarction. No effect of accreditation was found on the mortality rate, mortality rate within the first 48 hours of hospitalization, and the average rate of hospital days per patient at the level of the institution. Conclusion. The process of accreditation undoubtedly intensifies activities that contribute to improving health care quality, which results in better health outcomes. Additional research in this field and new evidence about the relationship between accreditation and quality upgrading in health care institutions are required because this could motivate their managers to decide more easily to enter into this process and implement it, despite the additional efforts and financial investments associated with accreditation.

1 November 2017 in Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (English Edition)
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MLMirjana Lapčević
Mirjana Lapčević
MVMira Vuković
Mira Vuković
BGBranislav S. Gvozdenović
Branislav S. Gvozdenović
VMVesna Mioljević
Vesna Mioljević
SMSnežana Marjanović
Snežana Marjanović
Fatigue, anxiety and depression are very frequent symptoms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this study we evaluated the influence of socioeconomic characteristics, therapy and comorbidities on the self-reported high fatigue, anxiety and depression in patients with RA. Multicenter cross-sectional study was performed in 22 health institutions in Serbia during the period from April-August 2014 in population of older RA patients. Self-reported patients health status was measured by: Fatigue Assessment Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7. Treatment modalities were defined as: (1) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or analgesics and/or corticosteroids; (2) synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) alone or in combination with corticosteroids and/or NSAIDs and (3) any RA treatment which includes biologic DMARDs. There were significant predictors of high depression: synthetic DMARDs therapy in combination with corticosteroids and/or NSAIDs, physiotherapist self-payment, frequent taxi use, alternative treatment and employment status. The need for another person's assistance, supplemental calcium therapy and professional qualifications were the predictors of a high fatigue, whereas the age above 65 years had the protective effect on it. Anxiety was an independent high fatigue predictor. The predictors of a high anxiety were: gastroprotection with proton-pump inhibitors and patient occupation. Socioeconomic predictors of self-reported high depression, anxiety or fatigue are different for each of the mentioned outcomes, while accompanied with the basic RA treatment they exclusively explain a high depression. The anxiety, jointed with the socioeconomic variables and supplemental therapy, is a significant fatigue predictor in RA patients.