Ikhwan Rinaldi

Dr. Ikhwan Rinaldi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2023 in Journal of Blood Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IRIkhwan Rinaldi
Ikhwan Rinaldi
KWKevin Winston
Kevin Winston
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is one of the most common leukemias occurring in the adult population. The course of CML is divided into three phases: the chronic phase, the acceleration phase, and the blast phase. Pathophysiology of CML revolves around Philadelphia chromosome that constitutively activate tyrosine kinase through BCR-ABL1 oncoprotein. In the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), CML patients now have a similar life expectancy to people without CML, and it is now very rare for CML patients to progress to the blast phase. Only a small proportion of CML patients have resistance to TKI, caused by BCR-ABL1 point mutations. CML patients with TKI resistance should be treated with second or third generation TKI, depending on the BCR-ABL1 mutation. Recently, many studies have shown that it is possible for CML patients who achieve a long-term deep molecular response to stop TKIs treatment and maintain remission. This review aimed to provide an overview of CML, including its pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, the role of stem cells, CML treatments, and treatment-free remission.

1 July 2021 in Journal of Blood Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IRIkhwan Rinaldi
Ikhwan Rinaldi
RSResti Mulya Sari
Resti Mulya Sari
VTVanya Utami Tedhy
Vanya Utami Tedhy
KWKevin Winston
Kevin Winston
Introduction: Leukostasis is a medical emergency with high mortality which often occurs in acute myeloid leukemia patients with hyperleukocytosis. One of the therapies that can be used for leukostasis in acute myeloid leukemia is leukapheresis. However, whether leukapheresis can provide better survival benefit when compared with patients not receiving leukapheresis is still unclear. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy plus leukapheresis combination versus chemotherapy only on 28-day survival of acute myeloid leukemia patients with leukostasis. Methods: This study was a dual-center retrospective cohort using secondary data from medical records collected from November 2018 to March 2019. Inclusion criteria were adult patients aged 18 years old or above, diagnosed with acute leukemia with hyperleukocytosis status defined by WBC count greater than 100,000/uL, and with symptoms of leukostasis. One-month survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan–Meier curve method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were then conducted using Cox proportional hazards model to obtain value of hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: A total of 38 patients were obtained for analysis. The median overall survival was 25 days (95% CI: 17.001– 32.999 days) in the chemotherapy only group and 20 days (95% CI: 1.497– 38.503) in the chemotherapy with leukapheresis group. The use of leukapheresis did not affect 28-day survival (HR: 1.140; 95% CI: 0.396– 3.283; p value: 0.809) and 7-day survival (HR: 1.073; 95% CI: 0.277– 4.152; p value: 0.919). In the multivariate analysis, age ≥ 60 years, blast percentage ≥ 90%, creatinine ≥ 1.4 mg/dL, and presence of disseminated intravascular coagulation were associated with worse 28-day survival. Conclusion: AML patients with leukostasis who received both chemotherapy and leukapheresis did not have better 28-day survival and 7-day survival when compared with patients receiving chemotherapy only. Old age, high blast percentage, high creatinine, and presence of disseminated intravascular coagulation were prognostic factors for worse 28-day survival.

5 August 2022 in Frontiers in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IRIkhwan Rinaldi
Ikhwan Rinaldi
SPSamuel Pratama
Samuel Pratama
LWLowilius Wiyono
Lowilius Wiyono
JTJeremy Rafael Tandaju
Jeremy Rafael Tandaju
IWIndy Larasati Wardhana
Indy Larasati Wardhana
KWKevin Winston
Kevin Winston
Patient populations, including those with hematological malignancies, have different responses to COVID-19 vaccines. This study aimed to quantitatively analyze the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in patients with hematological malignancies. Studies reporting on the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in cohorts with hematological malignancies compared to healthy controls were systematically searched in four databases. Meta-analysis and subgroup analyses were performed to generate quantitative synthesis. Fifteen studies with 2,055 cohorts with hematological malignancies and 1,105 healthy subjects as control were included. After two doses of COVID-19 vaccination, only 60% of cohorts with hematological malignancies were seroconverted compared to healthy controls (RR 0.60; 95%CI 0.50–0.71). A single dose of the vaccine resulted in a significantly lower seroconversion rate (RR 0.30; 95%CI 0.16–0.54). Non-Hodgkin lymphoma cohorts had the lowest rate of seroconversion (RR 0.5; 95%CI 0.35–0.71) and those who received active treatments had lower immunological responses (RR 0.59; 95%CI 0.46–0.75). Antibody titers were lower in cohorts with hematological malignancies without any differences in adverse effects in both groups. In conclusion, cohorts with hematological malignancies showed a lower seroconversion rate and antibody titers after receiving COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. The type of malignancy and the status of treatment had a significant impact on the response to vaccination. The vaccines were shown to be safe for both patients with hematological malignancies and healthy controls. Booster doses and stricter health protocols might be beneficial for patient populations.

31 October 2022 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IRIkhwan Rinaldi
Ikhwan Rinaldi
MSMondastri Korib Sudaryo
Mondastri Korib Sudaryo
NPNurhayati Prihartono
Nurhayati Prihartono
Background: sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by an excessive host immunological response to infection. The incidence of sepsis is increasing every year, and sepsis is the primary cause of mortality in intensive care units (ICUs). DIC is a coagulopathy syndrome that causes microvascular and macrovascular thrombosis and increases the risk of bleeding due to consumptive coagulopathy. The pathophysiology of DIC in sepsis is complex, and further research is required to investigate the involved mechanisms and risk factors. Method: this study is a prognostic analysis of a retrospective cohort. Samples were patients diagnosed with sepsis and admitted to Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital from January 2016 to October 2022. Research subjects were followed until occurrence of DIC during sepsis or recovery from sepsis. The research subjects were selected from medical records using a consecutive total sampling approach. The inclusion criteria were patients aged ≥18 years old and diagnosed with sepsis according to qSOFA criteria with a score of 2. The exclusion criterion was an incomplete medical record. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine which independent variables contributed to the incidence of DIC and obtain the odds ratios (ORs). p < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Results: a total of 248 patients were included after considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 50 (20.2%) septic patients developed DIC. In the multivariate analysis, albumin ≤2.5 g/dL (OR: 2.363; 95% CI: 1.201–4.649), respiratory infection (OR: 2.414; 95% CI: 1.046–5.571), and antibiotic treatment ≥1 h (OR: 2.181; 95% CI: 1.014–4.689) were associated with DIC development. On the basis of the ROC curve, the area under the curve (AUC) was determined to be 0.705 with 95% CI = (0.631–0.778). Conclusion: in our study, the prevalence of DIC in septic patients was 20.2%. Low albumin, respiratory infection, and antibiotic treatment ≥1 h were found to be risk factors for development of DIC in septic patients.

24 January 2022 in Hematology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IRIkhwan Rinaldi
Ikhwan Rinaldi
NSNoorwati Sutandyo
Noorwati Sutandyo
KWKevin Winston
Kevin Winston
One of the treatment modalities that can be used for hyperleukocytosis is leukapheresis. However, the result of studies showing the benefit of early mortality through the use of leukapheresis versu...

31 December 2022 in Cureus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EAElly Y. Arwanih
Elly Y. Arwanih
MLMelva Louisa
Melva Louisa
IRIkhwan Rinaldi
Ikhwan Rinaldi
SWSeptelia Inawati Wanandi
Septelia Inawati Wanandi
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological malignancy commonly found in adult patients. Low overall survival and resistance to therapy are the main issues in AML. The first line of treatment for AML chemotherapy is the induction phase, namely, the phase to induce remission by administering a combination of daunorubicin (DNR) for three days followed by administration of cytarabine (Ara-C) with continuous infusion for seven days, which is referred to as "3 + 7." Such induction therapy has been the standard therapy for AML for the last four decades. This review article is made to discuss daunorubicin and cytarabine from their chemical structure, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and mechanisms of resistance in AML.