Cognitive loads have been shown to influence anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk. Two main sources of cognitive loads that athletes experience are decision making and dividing attention between multiple tasks. The aim of this paper was to review previous studies examining the effects of decision making and divided attention on lower limb biomechanics during landing and cutting. Previous research has shown decision making to significantly influence a number of biomechanical variables associated with increased risk of ACL injury, such as reduced knee flexion at initial contact, increased knee valgus angles, increased knee extension moment and increased knee valgus moment in decision-making tasks compared to pre-planned tasks. Furthermore, dividing attention between multiple tasks has been shown to result in reduced knee flexion at initial contact, increased vertical ground reaction force, and reduced stability during landing/cutting. The changes in lower limb biomechanics observed as a result of both decision making and dividing attention are likely due to a reduced ability to anticipate ground contact and implement protective movement patterns associated with reduced ACL loading. Collectively, these findings emphasise the need for tasks that incorporate decision making and divided attention when investigating ACL injury mechanisms and developing ACL injury risk screening assessments.

Recent advances in technology have generated several new types of equipment which can be used within biomechanics to measure motion and inertial forces during human movement (Adesida et al., 2019; ...

The aims of this narrative review were to summarise trunk motion and external trunk perturbation observed in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury videos and to review the association between trunk motion and ACL loading variables in controlled jump-landing and cutting tasks in non-injured populations. Video analyses have shown limited trunk flexion and increased trunk lateral bending towards the injured leg are associated with increased risk of ACL injuries, while trunk axial rotation away from the injured leg is more frequent than rotation towards the injured leg. Contact with the trunk before and at the time of the injury is common and might increase the risk of ACL injury. Controlled jump-landing and cutting studies have shown that limited trunk flexion and increased trunk lateral bending are associated with increased ACL loading. However, the findings of trunk axial rotation are not consistent with most video analyses. Mid-flight external trunk perturbation could increase ACL loading variables for one leg and is consistent with the videos of trunk-contact ACL injuries. These findings may help understand the role of trunk motion on primary ACL injury mechanisms and improve ACL injury screening tasks and ACL injury prevention strategies with the consideration of trunk motion.

To identify reported (1) common biomechanical asymmetries in the literature after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in adolescents during landing and (2) timescales for asymmetry to persist postsurgery. We identified sources by searching the CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus electronic databases using the following search terms: asymmetry OR symmetry AND landing AND biomechanics OR kinematics OR kinetics. We screened the titles and abstracts of 85 articles using our inclusion criteria. A total of 13 articles were selected for further analysis. Three reviewers independently assessed the methodologic quality of each study. We extracted the effect sizes directly from studies or calculated them for biomechanical variables assessing asymmetry between limbs of participants with ACL reconstruction. We conducted meta-analyses on variables that were assessed in multiple studies for both double- and single-limb landings. Asymmetry was more commonly identified in kinetic than kinematic variables. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction appeared to have a large effect on asymmetry between limbs for peak vertical ground reaction force, peak knee-extension moment, and loading rate during double-limb landings, as well as mean knee-extension moment and knee energy absorption during both double- and single-limb landings. Our findings suggested that return-to-sport criteria after ACL reconstruction should incorporate analysis of the asymmetry in loading experienced by each limb rather than movement patterns alone.

(2020). Recommendations for statistical analysis involving null hypothesis significance testing. Sports Biomechanics. Ahead of Print.

Chronic ankle instability (CAI) has previously been linked to altered lower limb kinematics and muscle activation characteristics during walking, though little research has been performed analysing the full time-series across the stance and swing phases of gait. The aim of this study was to compare trunk and lower limb kinematics and muscle activity between those with chronic ankle instability and healthy controls. Kinematics and muscle activity were measured in 18 (14 males, 4 females) healthy controls (age 22.4 ± 3.6 years, height 177.8 ± 7.6 cm, mass 70.4 ± 11.9 kg, UK shoe size 8.4 ± 1.6), and 18 (13 males, 5 females) participants with chronic ankle instability (age 22.0 ± 2.7 years, height 176.8 ± 7.9 cm, mass 74.1 ± 9.6 kg, UK shoe size 8.1 ± 1.9) during barefoot walking trials, using a combined Helen Hayes and Oxford foot model. Surface electromyography (sEMG) was recorded for the tibialis anterior and gluteus medius. Full curve statistical parametric mapping was performed using independent and paired-samples T-tests. No significant differences were observed in kinematic or sEMG variables between or within groups for the duration of the swing phase of gait. A significantly increased forefoot-tibia inversion was seen in the CAI affected limb when compared to the CAI unaffected limb at 4-16% stance (p = 0.039). No other significant differences were observed. There appears to be no differences in muscle activation and movement between CAI and healthy control groups. However, participants with CAI exhibited increased inversion patterns during the stance phase of gait in their affected limb compared to their unaffected limb. This may predispose those with CAI to episodes of giving way and further ankle sprains.