Bianca Arrhenius

Dr. Bianca Arrhenius

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SUSubina Upadhyaya
Subina Upadhyaya
TSTiia Ståhlberg
Tiia Ståhlberg
SSSanju Silwal
Sanju Silwal
BABianca Arrhenius
Bianca Arrhenius
ASAndre Sourander
Andre Sourander
Prenatal exposure to vitamin D may play a significant role in human brain development and function. Previous epidemiological studies investigating the associations between maternal vitamin D status and offspring developmental and psychiatric outcomes in humans have been inconclusive. We aimed to systematically assess the results of previously published studies that examined the associations between maternal vitamin D levels, measured as circulating 25(OH)D levels in pregnancy or at birth, and offspring neuropsychiatric and psychiatric outcomes. Systematic searches were conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO and Web of Science for studies published by 10 August 2022. We included human observational studies that examined associations between prenatal or perinatal vitamin D levels and offspring neuropsychiatric and psychiatric outcomes and were published in English in peer-reviewed journals. Of the 3729 studies identified, 66 studies were screened for full texts and 29 studies published between 2003 and 2022 were included in the final review. There was a small amount of evidence for the association between prenatal vitamin D deficiency and autism spectrum disorder. When studies with larger sample sizes and stricter definitions of vitamin D deficiency were considered, positive associations were also found for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and schizophrenia. Future studies with larger sample sizes, longer follow-up periods and prenatal vitamin D assessed at multiple time points are needed.

15 June 2018 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BABianca Arrhenius
Bianca Arrhenius
DGDavid Gyllenberg
David Gyllenberg
RCRoshan Chudal
Roshan Chudal
VLVenla Lehti
Venla Lehti
MSMinna Sucksdorff
Minna Sucksdorff
ASAndre Sourander
Andre Sourander
Broadly defined learning and coordination disorders (LCDs) are common in the population and have previously been associated with familial social risk factors and male sex. However, comprehensive nationwide studies of these risk factors in LCD subgroups are lacking. Our objective was to assess different LCDs in relation to sex and maternal education, marital status and socioeconomic status based on occupation. We conducted a nationwide register-based study. The following diagnoses were identified from the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register (FHDR) according to the ICD-10 (n = 28,192): speech disorders (F80), scholastic disorders (F81), motor and coordination disorders (F82) and mixed developmental disorder (F83). To study cumulative incidence and male: female ratios of service use of LCDs, we used a cohort design among all Finnish children born singleton 1996–2007 (n = 690,654); to study social risk factors, we used a nested case-control design with extensive register data on both cases and matched controls (n = 106,616). The cumulative incidence was 4.7% for any LCD by age 15 and the changes in cumulative incidence over time were minor. The male: female ratios were 2.2–3.0 across LCD subgroups. Learning and coordination disorders were more common in households with lower maternal education, socioeconomic status based on occupation and among children with single mothers at the time of birth; the odds ratios (OR) for any LCD were 1.2–1.9 across risk factors. The odds for LCD diagnosis increased linearly with the number of social risk factors, except for coordination disorder. The effect size of three risk factors was highest in the group with mixed or multiple LCDs; OR 3.76 (95% CI 3.31–4.28). Multiple social risk factors increase the odds for multiple, more comprehensive learning difficulties. The findings have implications for service planning, as early identification and interventions of learning and coordination disorders might reduce related long-term social adversities.

17 March 2021 in JCPP Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BABianca Arrhenius
Bianca Arrhenius
DGDavid Gyllenberg
David Gyllenberg
MVMiika Vuori
Miika Vuori
ETElina Tiiri
Elina Tiiri
LLLotta Lempinen
Lotta Lempinen
ASAndre Sourander
Andre Sourander
Background: Being among the youngest in class has previously been associated with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and academic disadvantage, but the relative age effect on learning disorders is less well understood. This study examined whether relatively young children are more likely to be diagnosed with specific learning disorders than their older peers.Methods: The setting included all 388,650 children born singleton in Finland from 1996 to 2002. Cases diagnosed with specific learning disorders in specialized health care by the age of 10 were identified from national registers. Cumulative incidences of specific learning disorders and the corresponding incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each birth month compared to January.Results: During follow‐up, 3162 (0.8% of 388,650) children were diagnosed with a specific learning disorder. Children born in December displayed higher cumulative incidences for specific learning disorders than children born in January (IRR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.50–2.11). The findings were similar for girls (IRR: 2.01, 1.44–2.83) and boys (IRR: 1.70, 1.39–2.08). ADHD did not explain the association, as the IRR for the youngest children with specific learning disorders and ADHD was 1.59 (1.13–2.26) compared to those without ADHD (IRR: 1.84, 1.51–2.24).Conclusions: Relatively younger children in Finnish schools were more likely to be diagnosed with a specific learning disorder by the age of 10. Increased awareness of how relative age differences affect the likelihood for children to be diagnosed with specific learning disorders is needed among parents, clinicians, and teachers.

23 September 2021 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BABianca Arrhenius
Bianca Arrhenius
SUSubina Upadhyaya
Subina Upadhyaya
SHSusanna Hinkka-Yli-Salomäki
Susanna Hinkka-Yli-Salomäki
ABAlan S. Brown
Alan S. Brown
KCKeely Cheslack-Postava
Keely Cheslack-Postava
ASAndre Sourander
Andre Sourander
Recent evidence has suggested potential harmful effects of vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy on offspring brain development, for example, elevated risks for neuropsychiatric disorders. Findings on general cognition and academic achievement are mixed, and no studies have examined the effect of prenatal 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels on diagnosed specific learning disorders, which was the aim of this study. We examined a nested case–control sample from the source cohort of all singleton-born children in Finland between 1996 and 1997 (n = 115,730). A total of 1607 cases with specific learning disorders (mean age at diagnosis: 9.9 years) and 1607 matched controls were identified from Finnish nationwide registers. Maternal 25(OH)D levels were analyzed from serum samples collected during the first trimester of pregnancy and stored in a national biobank. Conditional logistic regression was used to test the association between maternal 25(OH)D and offspring specific learning disorders. There were no significant associations between maternal 25(OH)D levels and specific learning disorders when vitamin D was examined as a log-transformed continuous variable (adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.82–1.18, p = 0.84) or as a categorical variable (25(OH)D < 30 nmol/L: adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.83–1.28, p = 0.77 compared to levels of >50 nmol/L), nor when it was divided into quintiles (adjusted OR for the lowest quintile 1.00, 95% CI 0.78–1.28, p = 0.99 compared to the highest quintile). This study found no association between low maternal 25(OH)D in early pregnancy and offspring specific learning disorders.

15 December 2025 in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ZKZahra Kafami Khorasani
Zahra Kafami Khorasani
SUSubina Upadhyaya
Subina Upadhyaya
TSTiia Ståhlberg
Tiia Ståhlberg
BABianca Arrhenius
Bianca Arrhenius
EHEmmi Heinonen
Emmi Heinonen
ASAndre Sourander
Andre Sourander
Purpose: Research on Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) trends and risk factors, particularly relating to by intellectual disability (ID), is limited. This study examined the incidence, sociodemographic risk factors and co-occurrence conditions of ASD, including categorization by ID, using national registers. Methods: This study included singletons born in Finland between 1998 and 2015 who had been diagnosed with ASD by 2018, with cases categorized into ASD with ID and ASD without ID. We divided the study sample into four birth cohorts (1998–2002, 2003–2007, 2008–2011 and 2012–2015) to analyze changes in incidence over time. Cases ( n = 10,171) were matched with controls ( n = 49,391) by age, gender, and birthplace. Associations between sociodemographic risk factors and ASD were analyzed using conditional logistic regression. Co-occurrence with other psychiatric disorders was examined only in the oldest cohort (1992–2002). Results: The cumulative incidence of ASD without ID increased from 0.52 to 0.89% by age 10, while ASD with ID remained stable at 0.17%. Several socio-demographic risk factors were associated with both groups, while parental immigration status was only associated with cases with ID. A total of 59.0% of cases had one co-occurring psychiatric disorder, with a significant difference in prevalence between the groups ( p < .05). Conclusion: The increase in diagnosed ASD, particularly without ID, recorded by specialized services in Finland between 1998 and 2018 may reflect a real increase in incidence, or changes in diagnostic criteria and practices, improved mental health services, greater public and professional awareness or treatment seeking behavior.

7 August 2021 in Acta Paediatrica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BABianca Arrhenius
Bianca Arrhenius
ASAmir Sariaslan
Amir Sariaslan
ASAuli Suominen
Auli Suominen
ASAndre Sourander
Andre Sourander
DGDavid Gyllenberg
David Gyllenberg
Aim: This study examined the associations between prenatal smoking and speech and language, scholastic, coordination and mixed developmental disorders in offspring, using sibling and population controls.Methods: National Finnish registers were used to identify all 690 654 singletons born between 1996 and 2007 and any cases diagnosed with speech and language, scholastic, coordination and mixed developmental disorders by the end of 2012. Cases were compared to population controls, biological full‐siblings and maternal half‐siblings born during the same period. Conditional logistic regression was used to assess any associations between smoking during pregnancy and the selected developmental disorders.Results: Prenatal smoking was higher in the mothers of the 27 297 cases (21.7%) than the 99 876 population controls (14.5%). The adjusted odds ratio for smoking throughout pregnancy, and any diagnosis of speech and language, scholastic, coordination or mixed developmental disorders, was 1.29 (95% confidence interval 1.24–1.34). However, when we compared a subsample of 15 406 cases and their 20 657 siblings, the association was no longer statistically significant (odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 0.98–1.21).Conclusion: The sibling comparisons suggested that the associations between prenatal smoking and speech and language, scholastic, coordination and mixed developmental disorders were confounded by familial factors shared by differentially exposed siblings.