Virtual reality (VR) applications could be beneficial for education, training, and treatment. However, VR may induce symptoms of simulator sickness (SS) such as difficulty focusing, difficulty concentrating, or dizziness that could impair autonomic nervous system function, affect mental workload, and worsen interventional outcomes. In the original randomized controlled trial, which explored the effectiveness of using a 360° VR video versus a two-dimensional VR video to learn history taking and physical examination skills, only the former group participants had SS. Therefore, 28 undergraduate medical students who participated in a 360° VR learning module were included in this post hoc study using a repeated measures design. Data of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ), heart rate variability (HRV) analysis, Task Load Index, and Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise were retrospectively reviewed and statistically analyzed. Ten (36%) participants had mild SS (total score > 0 and ≤ 20), and 18 (64%) had no SS symptom. Total SSQ score was positively related to the very low frequency (VLF) band power, physical demand subscale, and frustration subscale, and inversely related to physical examination score. Using multilevel modeling, the VLF power mediated the relationship between total SSQ score and physical examination score. Furthermore, frustration subscale moderated the mediating effects of the VLF power. Our results highlight the importance of documenting SS to evaluate a 360° VR training program. Furthermore, the combination of HRV analysis with mental workload measurement and outcome assessments provided the important clinical value in evaluating the effects of SS in VR applications in medical education.

Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disease in adults, which influences human relations, quality of life and associates with major complications. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard treatment modality in OSA patients. For patients incompliant or unwilling to CPAP therapy, surgery is an alternative treatment. Sleep surgery for OSA include intrapharyngeal surgery, extrapharyngeal surgery and bariatric surgery addressing upper airway soft tissue, maxillofacial bone, and obesity, respectively. Among sleep surgeries, intrapharyngeal surgery (soft tissue surgery) is widespread used and serves overwhelming majority in OSA surgical patients. Despite the popularity of intrapharyngeal surgery, its outcomes can be influenced by multiple factors and consequently need conjunctive remedy to enhance at the short-term and sustain in the long-term. In this article, we introduce updated indications for treating OSA, practical principle in decision-making between CPAP and surgery, hybrid procedures in treating obstruction at the nose, palate, tongue and epiglottis, and postoperative integrated treatment including oropharyngeal myofunctional therapy (local), positional therapy (regional), and body weight reduction (systemic), and circadian rhythm (central). In summary, intrapharyngeal surgery is a target-oriented procedure that needs to be performed precisely and combines with integrated treatment as a holistic care for OSA patients.

Surgery with parotidectomy is the preferable treatment for most parotid tumors. Our meta-analysis compared the differences between the use of the LigaSure (LS) device and the conventional suture ligation technique (CT) in parotidectomies. A literature search in databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library was carried out. Studies including parotidectomy using LS and CT were included with the intraoperative and postoperative parameters collected. Continuous operative time data were measured by mean differences (MDs). Discrete data on postoperative complications, including facial palsy, postoperative bleeding, and salivary complications, were evaluated with risk differences (RDs). All values were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Five studies were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in operative time in the LS group (MD: −21.92; 95% CI, −30.18 to −13.66). In addition, the analysis indicated that the incidence of postoperative complications, including permanent facial palsy (RD, −0.01; 95% CI, −0.06 to 0.05), temporary facial palsy (RD, 0.00; 95% CI, −0.03 to 0.04), salivary complications (RD, −0.01; 95% CI, −0.08 to 0.06), and postoperative bleeding (RD, −0.02; 95% CI, −0.07 to 0.04), were all similar between the LS group and the CT group. According to the results, the LS device appears to be a safe and useful tool and could shorten the operative time in patients needing parotidectomy.

Although continuous positive airway pressure is the gold standard for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), it does not improve obesity. By contrast, bariatric surgery significantly improves obesity but with sustained OSA in the majority of patients. This study proposes a comprehensive technique—combined airway and bariatric surgery (CABS)—to improve both obesity and OSA. The aims of the study are to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of CABS in morbidly obese OSA patients. The retrospective study enrolled 20 morbidly obese OSA patients (13 males; median age, 44 years; median apnea–hypopnea index (AHI), 63.2 event/h; median body mass index (BMI), 41.4 kg/m²). The study population was divided into two groups based on patients’ volition after shared decision making. The bariatric surgery (BS) group included laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG, n = 8) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB, n = 2). CABS involved bariatric surgery—LSG (n = 8) and LRYGB (n = 2) in conjunction with airway surgery (concurrent nasal/palatal/lingual surgery [n = 8], concurrent palatal/lingual surgery [n = 2]). Patients received a home sleep apnea test at baseline and one year after surgery. The two patient groups were not different in age, sex, preoperative AHI or preoperative BMI. There was no airway compromise, wound bleeding or infection throughout the postoperative period. One year after surgery, patients in both groups achieved significant improvement in AHI and BMI. Furthermore, the improvement in AHI was significantly higher (p = 0.04) in the CABS group than in the BS group despite the insignificant change in BMI reduction (p = 0.63) between the two groups. In the CABS group, the BMI dropped from 40.4 to 28.4 kg/m2 (p < 0.0001) and the AHI decreased from 75.1 to 4.5 event/h (p = 0.0004). The classic success rate for OSA was 90% and the cure rate was 60% in the CABS group. A perioperative assessment of CABS group patients also revealed a significant improvement in the Epworth sleepiness scale, minimal O₂ saturation, snoring index and heart rate. CABS is feasible and safe in treating OSA with morbid obesity. CABS achieves more reduction in AHI than BS alone with high success and cure rates for OSA. CABS can also significantly improve quality of life and general health and offers a comprehensive alternative for morbidly obese OSA patients.

Objectives: Our aim was to investigate the diagnostic challenges and management of relapsing polychondritis (RP) with airway involvement, highlighting the need for accurate diagnosis and effective intervention to prevent severe complications. Methods: In this retrospective study, medical records from January 2011 through June 2024 at a single tertiary-care institution were reviewed. This study was approved by the institutional review board. A total of 34 patients were diagnosed with RP, among whom 4 presented with significant airway complications. This study focused on these four patients, detailing their clinical presentations, diagnostic processes, and outcomes following various interventions. Results: All patients were initially misdiagnosed with asthma and later developed severe airway issues necessitating interventions such as tracheotomy and endotracheal intubation. Diagnostic imaging, microlaryngoscopy and bronchoscopy (MLB) were crucial for identifying subglottic stenosis and other airway alterations. Treatments included high-dose steroids, rituximab, and surgical interventions such as balloon dilation and tracheostomy. Only one patient could be decannulated; the other three remained dependent on tracheostomy and experienced significant complications due to emergency medical interventions. Conclusions: RP can manifest with nonspecific respiratory symptoms similar to asthma, which may delay correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment, leading to critical airway complications. The early, precise identification of RP, particularly with airway involvement, is vital. MLB and dynamic expiratory CT scans play significant roles in clinical diagnosis and management. A multidisciplinary approach involving otolaryngologists, rheumatologists, and pulmonologists is essential for optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing complications.