Fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (FCSEMSs) are inserted in patients with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) to resolve malignant distal bile duct obstructions. Some patients receive FCSEMSs during primary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and others receive FCSEMSs during a later session, after the placement of a plastic stent. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of FCSEMSs for primary use or following plastic stent placement. A total of 159 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (m:f, 102:57) who had achieved clinical success underwent ERCP with the placement of FCSEMSs for palliation of obstructive jaundice. One-hundred and three patients had received FCSEMSs in a first ERCP, and 56 had received FCSEMSs after prior plastic stenting. Twenty-two patients in the primary metal stent group and 18 in the prior plastic stent group had recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO). The RBO rates and self-expandable metal stent patency duration did not differ between the two groups. An FCSEMS longer than 6 cm was identified as a risk factor for RBO in patients with PDAC. Thus, choosing an appropriate FCSEMS length is an important factor in preventing FCSEMS dysfunction in patients with PDAC with malignant distal bile-duct obstruction.

Purpose: Self-expandable metal stents are used for malignant duodenal obstruction. Outcomes between stents placed above and below the papilla of Vater differ, and no study has investigated these differences. We evaluated the efficacy and adverse events of stent placement in these two locations and reported our experience with self-expandable metal stent placement in patients. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with unresectable metastatic cancers (n = 101), who underwent successful duodenal self-expandable metal stent placement between 2008 and 2018. Patients were divided into above and below the papilla of Vater groups. Patient demographics, technical and clinical outcomes, post-procedural morbidity, and stent patency were analyzed. Results: Overall, 71 and 30 patients had intestinal obstruction above (including the papilla itself) and below the papilla of Vater and underwent successful stenting. Common bile duct obstruction was more common in the above-papilla group. Procedure time was similar between the groups, if an appropriate endoscope could facilitate stent placement in the below-papilla group. Both groups achieved symptomatic relief. Median stent patency duration was not significantly different between the groups; three patients had severe gastrointestinal bleeding due to postoperative vascular-enteric fistula. Conclusion: Self-expandable metal stents can effectively relieve symptoms of duodenal obstructions located above and below the papilla of Vater. Duodenoscopes could facilitate stent placement if the obstruction is located below the papilla of Vater; if gastrointestinal bleeding occurs postoperatively, the possibility of vascular-enteric fistula formation should be considered.

Background: Concurrent acute cholecystitis and acute cholangitis is a unique clinical situation. We tried to investigate the optimal timing of cholecystectomy after adequate biliary drainage under this condition. Methods: From January 2012 to November 2017, we retrospectively screened all in-hospitalized patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and then identified patients with concurrent acute cholecystitis and acute cholangitis from the cohort. The selected patients were stratified into two groups: one-stage intervention (OSI) group (intended laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the same hospitalization) vs. two-stage intervention (TSI) group (interval intended laparoscopic cholecystectomy). Interrogated outcomes included recurrent biliary events, length of hospitalization, and surgical outcomes. Results: There were 147 patients ultimately enrolled for analysis (OSI vs. TSI, 96 vs. 51). Regarding surgical outcomes, there was no significant difference between the OSI group and TSI group, including intraoperative blood transfusion (1.0% vs. 2.0%, p = 1.000), conversion to open procedure (3.1% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.236), postoperative complication (6.3% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.342), operation time (118.0 min vs. 125.8 min, p = 0.869), and postoperative days until discharge (3.37 days vs. 4.02 days, p = 0.643). In the RBE analysis, the OSI group presented a significantly lower incidence of overall RBE (5.2% vs. 41.2%, p < 0.001) than the TSI group. Conclusions: Patients with an initial diagnosis of concurrent acute cholecystitis and cholangitis undergoing cholecystectomy after ERCP drainage during the same hospitalization period may receive some benefit in terms of clinical outcomes.

Duodenal obstruction is often accompanied with unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction in patients who have undergone biliary self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement. Duodenobiliary reflux (DBR) is a major cause of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) after covered biliary SEMS placement. We analyzed the risk factors for DBR-related SEMS dysfunction following treatment for malignant duodenal obstruction. Sixty-one patients with covered SEMS who underwent treatment for duodenal obstruction were included. We excluded patients with tumor-related stent dysfunction (n = 6) or metal stent migration (n = 1). Fifty-four patients who underwent covered biliary SEMS placement followed by duodenal metal stenting or surgical gastrojejunostomy were included. Eleven patients had DBR-related biliary SEMS dysfunction after treatment of duodenal obstruction. There was no difference between the duodenal metal stenting group and the surgical gastrojejunostomy group. Duodenal obstruction below the papilla of Vater and a score of ≤2 on the Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System after treatment for duodenal obstruction were associated with DBR-related covered biliary SEMS dysfunction. Thus, creating a reliable route for ensuring good oral intake and avoiding DBR in patients with duodenal obstruction below the papilla of Vater are both important factors in preventing DBR-related covered biliary SEMS dysfunction.

Background/Objectives: Icteric hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by obstructive jaundice, impaired liver function, and limited treatment options. Biliary drainage may relieve jaundice and permit subsequent anticancer therapy, but the clinical benefit of systemic treatment remains uncertain in this setting. Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 78 patients with icteric HCC who underwent biliary drainage via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD). Thirty patients received systemic treatment during the treatment course surrounding biliary drainage (five initiated treatment before drainage and 25 on or after drainage), whereas 48 did not receive systemic treatment. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox regression. Propensity score matching (PSM), time-dependent Cox regression, and a 42-day landmark analysis were performed as sensitivity analyses. Results: Median OS was longer with systemic treatment than without systemic treatment (14.6 vs. 6.7 months; p = 0.025), as was PFS (7.5 vs. 3.5 months; p = 0.005). After 1:1 PSM, systemic therapy remained associated with longer PFS (7.6 vs. 4.6 months; p = 0.044), whereas the OS difference was not statistically significant. In time-dependent analyses, systemic treatment was not significantly associated with OS (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.40–1.22; p = 0.207) or PFS (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.38–1.13; p = 0.128). Conclusions: Systemic treatment was associated with favorable outcomes in selected patients in the primary analyses, but these associations were attenuated after accounting for treatment timing. The findings are exploratory and do not establish a causal treatment effect.