Background: Recurrent common bile duct stone after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is an undesirable problem, even when a following cholecystectomy is carried out. Important factors are the composition and properties of stones; the most significant etiology among these is the lipid level. While numerous studies have established the association between serum lipid levels and gallstones, no study has previously reported on recurrent common bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy with following cholecystectomy. Materials and methods: We retrospectively collected 2016 patients underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2017 in Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Finally, 303 patients whose serum lipid levels had been checked following a cholecystectomy after ERCP were included for analysis. We evaluated if metabolic factors including body weight, BMI, HbA1C, serum lipid profile, and lipid-lowering drugs may impact the rate of common bile duct stone recurrence. Furthermore, we tried to find if there is any factor that may impact time to recurrence. Results: A serum HDL level ≥ 40 (p = 0.000, OR = 0.207, 95% CI = 0.114–0.376) is a protective factor, and a total cholesterol level ≥ 200 (p = 0.004, OR = 4.558, 95% CI = 1.625–12.787) is a risk factor of recurrent common bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy with cholecystectomy. Lipid-lowering drugs, specifically statins, have been shown to reduce the risk of recurrence significantly (p = 0.003, OR = 0.297, 95% CI = 0.132–0.665). No factors were found to impact the time to recurrence in this study. Conclusions: The serum lipid level could influence the recurrence of common bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by cholecystectomy, and it appears that statins can reduce the risk of recurrence.

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) gastrointestinal (GI) diseases impact both immunocompromised and immunocompetent individuals, yet comprehensive studies highlighting the differences between these groups are lacking. Methods: In this retrospective study (January 2000 to July 2022) of 401 patients with confirmed CMV GI diseases, we categorized them based on immunological status and compared manifestations, treatments, outcomes, and prognostic factors. Results: The immunocompromised patients (n = 193) showed older age, severe illnesses, and higher comorbidity rates. GI bleeding, the predominant manifestation, occurred more in the immunocompetent group (92.6% vs. 63.6%, p = 0.009). Despite longer antiviral therapy, the immunocompromised patients had higher in-hospital (32.2% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.034) and overall mortality rates (91.1% vs. 43.4%, p < 0.001). The independent factors influencing in-hospital mortality in the immunocompromised patients included GI bleeding (OR 5.782, 95% CI 1.257–26.599, p = 0.024) and antiviral therapy ≥ 14 days (OR 0.232, 95% CI 0.059–0.911, p = 0.036). In the immunocompetent patients, age (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.006–1.159, p = 0.032), GI bleeding (OR 10.036, 95% CI 1.183–85.133, p = 0.035), and time to diagnosis (OR 1.029, 95% CI 1.004–1.055, p = 0.021) were significant prognostic factors, with the age and diagnosis time cut-offs for survival being 70 years and 31.5 days, respectively. Conclusions: GI bleeding is the most common manifestation and prognostic factor in both groups. Early diagnosis and effective antiviral therapy can significantly reduce in-hospital mortality.

BACKGROUND Needle-knife precut papillotomy (NKP) is typically performed freehand. However, it remains unclear whether pancreatic stent (PS) placement can improve the outcomes of NKP. AIM To explore whether PS placement improves the success rate of NKP in patients with difficult biliary cannulation. METHODS This single-center retrospective study included 190 patients who underwent NKP between January 2017 and December 2021 after failed conventional biliary cannulation. In cases with incidental pancreatic duct cannulation during conventional biliary cannulation, the decision for pre-NKP PS placement was made at the endoscopist's discretion. The primary outcome was the difference in the NKP success rate between patients with and without PS placement; the secondary outcome was the adverse event rate. RESULTS Among the 190 participants, 82 received pre-NKP PS (PS-NKP group) whereas 108 did not [freehand or freehand NKP (FH-NKP) group]. Post-NKP selective biliary cannulation was successful in 167 (87.9%) patients, and the PS-NKP had a significantly higher success rate than the FH-NKP group (93.9% vs 83.3%, P = 0.027). The overall adverse event rates were 7.3% and 11.1% in the PS-NKP and FH-NKP groups, respectively (P = 0.493). A periampullary diverticulum (PAD) and significant intraoperative bleeding during NKP were independently associated with NKP failure; however, a pre-NKP PS was the only predictor of NKP success. Among the 44 participants with PADs, the PS-NKP group had a non-significantly higher NKP success rate than the FH-NKP group (87.5% and 65%, respectively; P = 0.076). CONCLUSION PS significantly improved the success rate of NKP in patients with difficult biliary cannulation.

Background and Aims: A higher incidence of extra-pancreatic malignancies (EPMs) in patients with pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) than in the general population has been shown in several studies. We suppose that EPMs also occur after IPMN has been diagnosed, but few reports have discussed the risk factors that have been identified, except for old age, which was only noted in one study. Our study aims to recognize the distribution of EPMs in Taiwanese patients with a longer duration of follow-up and investigate the risk factors to predict EPMs in IPMN patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 114 patients with pancreatic IPMN from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2014 in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. The characteristics of the patients were all recorded. Different EPMs are demonstrated as occurring before, concurrently with, or after IPMN diagnosis. The risk factors were compared between patients with or without an EPM. Results: After an average follow-up duration of 10.45 years, 47 EPMs occurred in 42 patients (36.8%), and over half were found after IPMN was diagnosed (55.3%). The most common EPMs were colon cancer and lung cancer (21.3%). Moreover, cyst size progression was highly associated with EPM occurrence (p = 0.004) and predictive of EPM occurrence after IPMN (p = 0.002), with a cut-off value of 1 cm (accuracy: 79%; sensitivity: 88%; specificity: 58%). Conclusions: Colon cancer and lung cancer account for the majority EPMs in Taiwan. EPMs were also frequently found after IPMN diagnosis when the follow-up duration was prolonged up to 10.45 years. Cyst size progression is a risk factor of EPM after IPMN diagnosis and we suggest a cut-off value of 1 cm for clinical utility.

Background/Objectives: Icteric hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by obstructive jaundice, impaired liver function, and limited treatment options. Biliary drainage may relieve jaundice and permit subsequent anticancer therapy, but the clinical benefit of systemic treatment remains uncertain in this setting. Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 78 patients with icteric HCC who underwent biliary drainage via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD). Thirty patients received systemic treatment during the treatment course surrounding biliary drainage (five initiated treatment before drainage and 25 on or after drainage), whereas 48 did not receive systemic treatment. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox regression. Propensity score matching (PSM), time-dependent Cox regression, and a 42-day landmark analysis were performed as sensitivity analyses. Results: Median OS was longer with systemic treatment than without systemic treatment (14.6 vs. 6.7 months; p = 0.025), as was PFS (7.5 vs. 3.5 months; p = 0.005). After 1:1 PSM, systemic therapy remained associated with longer PFS (7.6 vs. 4.6 months; p = 0.044), whereas the OS difference was not statistically significant. In time-dependent analyses, systemic treatment was not significantly associated with OS (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.40–1.22; p = 0.207) or PFS (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.38–1.13; p = 0.128). Conclusions: Systemic treatment was associated with favorable outcomes in selected patients in the primary analyses, but these associations were attenuated after accounting for treatment timing. The findings are exploratory and do not establish a causal treatment effect.