The well-replicated observation that many people maintain mental health despite exposure to severe psychological or physical adversity has ignited interest in the mechanisms that protect against stress-related mental illness. Focusing on resilience rather than pathophysiology in many ways represents a paradigm shift in clinical-psychological and psychiatric research that has great potential for the development of new prevention and treatment strategies. More recently, research into resilience also arrived in the neurobiological community, posing nontrivial questions about ecological validity and translatability. Drawing on concepts and findings from transdiagnostic psychiatry, emotion research, and behavioral and cognitive neuroscience, we propose a unified theoretical framework for the neuroscientific study of general resilience mechanisms. The framework is applicable to both animal and human research and supports the design and interpretation of translational studies. The theory emphasizes the causal role of stimulus appraisal (evaluation) processes in the generation of emotional responses, including responses to potential stressors. On this basis, it posits that a positive (non-negative) appraisal style is the key mechanism that protects against the detrimental effects of stress and mediates the effects of other known resilience factors. Appraisal style is shaped by three classes of cognitive processes – positive situation classification, reappraisal, and interference inhibition – that can be investigated at the neural level. Prospects for the future development of resilience research are discussed.

Resilience is the maintenance or rapid recovery of mental health during and after stressor exposure. It is becoming increasingly clear that resilience results from a complex and dynamic process of adaptation to stressors involving the biological, psychological and social levels. Positive appraisal style theory of resilience (PASTOR) claims that the common final pathway to maintained mental health lies in the non-negative (non-catastrophizing, non-pessimistic) appraisal of potential stressors, permitting the organism to fine-tune stress responses to optimal levels, thus avoiding unnecessary stress, inefficient deployment of resources and concomitant deleterious allostatic load effects. Successful adaptation consists in developing or strengthening a positive appraisal style. Another key element of PASTOR is that a positive appraisal style is strongly determined by the efficacy and efficiency of the neural and cognitive processes that underlie positive stressor appraisal. We here present a combined behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) battery designed to assess such processes repeatedly in longitudinal settings. The battery includes tests of stress reactivity and recovery, reward sensitivity, safety learning and memory in the context of fear conditioning and extinction, volitional situation-focused reappraisal, volitional self-focused reappraisal, and emotional interference inhibition, along with structural MRI and resting-state MRI scans. A detailed description of the battery methods is provided. The feasibility of the battery was successfully tested in N=55 healthy subjects; group results of the individual tasks largely replicate existing literature.

Introduction: Cognitive decline is part of the normal aging process, but also a major risk factor for dementia. Cognitive training interventions aim to attenuate cognitive decline, but training gains need to be transferable to untrained cognitive abilities to influence everyday function. Furthermore, the neurobiological basis of cognitive training gain transfer remains elusive. A possible candidate is increased bilateral hemisphere usage enabled by efficient structural connectivity, especially of prefrontal regions. Therefore, the present multicentric study used a cognitive training intervention to demonstrate training transfer and identify neurobiological modulators of successful transfer.Methods: In total 235 subjects were enrolled in AgeGain; 180 underwent a broad 4-week cognitive training intervention at three study sites. Pre- and post-training neuropsychological testing was conducted and successful transferers were identified according to preregistered definitions. Pre-training, subjects underwent diffusion and functional MRI to assess interhemispheric connectivity, measured as microstructural integrity of the corpus callosum and lateralization of functional activation patterns during a cognitive control task. Logistic regression models were estimated to predict successful transfer based on structural connectivity and bilateralization of activation patterns.Results: Out of 180 subjects, 74 showed short-term training gain transfer that was maintained over 3 months in 19 subjects. Neither microstructural integrity of the corpus callosum, nor bilateralized activation predicted training gain transfer alone. However, their interaction was associated with long-term transfer over 3 months: subjects with higher mean diffusivity of the corpus callosum and more bilateral functional activity or conversely with lower diffusivity of the corpus callosum and more lateral functional activity were more likely successful long-term transferers.Discussion: We demonstrated successful training gain transfer in 41.1% of subjects, among whom 25.7% maintained the transfer over 3 months. Successful long-term transfer of training gains may depend on divergent mechanisms of structural and functional connectivity, which may explain previous heterogeneous results in the literature.Trial register: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), ID: DRKS00013077. Registered on November 19th 2017.

Persons with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) often experience limitations in their quality of life (QoL). Some studies have shown positive effects of speech and language therapy on QoL in persons with PPA. However, there is still a lack of evidence for disorder-specific approaches for this important therapeutic goal. The biographic-narrative approach (narraktiv) has been shown to significantly improve QoL in persons with post-stroke aphasia. In the planned study, the biographic-narrative approach will be adapted for persons with PPA (Cope PPA), and its efficacy will be investigated. First, a focus group interview with five persons with PPA will be conducted to identify the wishes and needs of participants. Based on the results, the narraktiv manual according to Corsten et al. (2015) will be revised. Second, an efficacy study will be conducted according to the new Cope PPA manual with 24 persons with PPA in a waiting group control design. The primary outcome, QoL, will be assessed using questionnaires (Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39) and semistructured interviews. Depressive symptoms, life satisfaction and cognitive/communicative functioning will also be assessed. If Cope PPA proves efficacy, this study may help to improve the treatment of persons with PPA.