Marianne B. Müller

Prof. Dr. Marianne B. Müller

1. Laboratory of Translational Psychiatry, Dept. of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy and Focus Program Translational Neurosciences, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany
+1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 August 2014 in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RKRaffael Kalisch
Raffael Kalisch
MMMarianne B. Müller
Marianne B. Müller
OTOliver Tüscher
Oliver Tüscher
The well-replicated observation that many people maintain mental health despite exposure to severe psychological or physical adversity has ignited interest in the mechanisms that protect against stress-related mental illness. Focusing on resilience rather than pathophysiology in many ways represents a paradigm shift in clinical-psychological and psychiatric research that has great potential for the development of new prevention and treatment strategies. More recently, research into resilience also arrived in the neurobiological community, posing nontrivial questions about ecological validity and translatability. Drawing on concepts and findings from transdiagnostic psychiatry, emotion research, and behavioral and cognitive neuroscience, we propose a unified theoretical framework for the neuroscientific study of general resilience mechanisms. The framework is applicable to both animal and human research and supports the design and interpretation of translational studies. The theory emphasizes the causal role of stimulus appraisal (evaluation) processes in the generation of emotional responses, including responses to potential stressors. On this basis, it posits that a positive (non-negative) appraisal style is the key mechanism that protects against the detrimental effects of stress and mediates the effects of other known resilience factors. Appraisal style is shaped by three classes of cognitive processes – positive situation classification, reappraisal, and interference inhibition – that can be investigated at the neural level. Prospects for the future development of resilience research are discussed.

1 November 2001 in European Journal of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMarianne B. Müller
Marianne B. Müller
PLPaul J. Lucassen
Paul J. Lucassen
AYAlexander Yassouridis
Alexander Yassouridis
WHWitte J. G. Hoogendijk
Witte J. G. Hoogendijk
FHFlorian Holsboer
Florian Holsboer
DSDick F. Swaab
Dick F. Swaab

9 October 2018 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMichael A. van der Kooij
Michael A. van der Kooij
TJTanja Jene
Tanja Jene
GTGiulia Treccani
Giulia Treccani
IMIsabelle Miederer
Isabelle Miederer
AHAnnika Hasch
Annika Hasch
MMMarianne B. Müller
Marianne B. Müller
Significance: Stress-associated mental disorders and diabetes pose an enormous socio-economic burden. Glucose dysregulation occurs with both psychosocial and metabolic stress. While cognitive impairments are common in metabolic disorders such as diabetes and are accompanied by hyperglycemia, a causal role for glucose has not been established. We show that chronic social defeat (CSD) stress induces lasting peripheral and central hyperglycemia and impaired glucose metabolism in a subgroup of mice. Animals exhibiting hyperglycemia early post-CSD display spatial memory impairments that can be rescued by the antidiabetic empagliflozin. We demonstrate that individual stress vulnerability to glucose homeostasis can be identified early after insult and that stress-induced hyperglycemia directly impinges on cognitive integrity. Our findings further bridge the gap between stress-related pathologies and metabolic disorders.

21 July 2013 in Disease Markers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLChristiana Labermaier
Christiana Labermaier
MMMercè Masana
Mercè Masana
MMMarianne B. Müller
Marianne B. Müller
Major depression, affecting an estimated 350 million people worldwide, poses a serious social and economic threat to modern societies. There are currently two major problems calling for innovative research approaches, namely, the absence of biomarkers predicting antidepressant response and the lack of conceptually novel antidepressant compounds. Both, biomarker predictinga prioriwhether an individual patient will respond to the treatment of choice as well as an early distinction of responders and nonresponders during antidepressant therapy can have a significant impact on improving this situation. Biosignatures predicting antidepressant responsea priorior early in treatment would enable an evidence-based decision making on available treatment options. However, research to date does not identify any biologic or genetic predictors of sufficient clinical utility to inform the selection of specific antidepressant compound for an individual patient. In this review, we propose an optimized translational research strategy to overcome some of the major limitations in biomarker discovery. We are confident that early transfer and integration of data between both species, ideally leading to mutual supportive evidence from both preclinical and clinical studies, are most suitable to address some of the obstacles of current depression research.

3 October 2011 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMathias Schmidt
Mathias Schmidt
JSJan-Philip Schülke
Jan-Philip Schülke
CLClaudia Liebl
Claudia Liebl
MSMichael Stiess
Michael Stiess
CACharilaos Avrabos
Charilaos Avrabos
Theo ReinTheo Rein
Theo Rein
Stress has been identified as a major causal factor for many mental disorders. However, our knowledge about the chain of molecular and cellular events translating stress experience into altered behavior is still rather scant. Here, we have characterized a murine ortholog of the putative tumor suppressor gene DRR1 as a unique stress-induced protein in brain. It binds to actin, promotes bundling and stabilization of actin filaments, and impacts on actin-dependent neurite outgrowth. Endogenous DRR1 localizes to some, but not all, synapses, with preference for the presynaptic region. Hippocampal virus-mediated enhancement of DRR1 expression reduced spine density, diminished the probability of synaptic glutamate release, and altered cognitive performance. DRR1 emerges as a protein to link stress with actin dynamics, which in addition is able to act on synaptic function and cognition.

1 July 2021 in Journal of Psychiatric Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DHDavid P Herzog
David P Herzog
SWStefanie Wagner
Stefanie Wagner
JEJan Engelmann
Jan Engelmann
GTGiulia Treccani
Giulia Treccani
NDNadine Dreimüller
Nadine Dreimüller
KLKlaus Lieb
Klaus Lieb