The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NT) versus surgery first (SF) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains controversial. A random-effects meta-analysis of only prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NT versus SF for potentially resectable (PR) or borderline resectable (BR) PDAC was performed. Among six RCTs including 850 patients, 411 (48.3%) received NT and 439 (51.6%) SF. In all included trials, NT was gemcitabine-based: four using chemoradiation and two chemotherapy alone. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, NT resulted in improved overall survival (OS) compared to SF (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61–0.86). This effect was independent of anatomic classification (PR: hazard ratio (HR) 0.73, 95% CI 0.59–0.91; BR: HR 0.51 95% CI 0.28–0.93) or NT type (chemoradiation: HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61–0.98; chemotherapy alone: HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54–0.87). Overall resection rate was similar (risk ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% CI 0.82–1.04, I² = 39.0%) but NT increased the likelihood of a margin-negative (R0) resection (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.18–1.93, I² = 0%) and having negative lymph nodes (RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.47–2.91, I² = 12.3%). In this meta-analysis of prospective RCTs, NT significantly improved OS in an intention-to-treat fashion, compared with SF for localized PDAC. Randomized controlled trials using contemporary multi-agent chemotherapy will be needed to confirm these findings and to define the optimal NT regimen.

Mucin-5AC (MUC5AC) is a heavily glycosylated gel-forming secreted mucin with a reliable prognostic value when detected in multiple malignancies. It is highly prevalent (70%) in PDA and is nonexistent in normal pancreatic tissues. Retrospective studies on PDA tumor tissue (detected by immunohistochemistry or IHC)) have investigated the prognostic value of MUC5AC expression but were equivocal. Some studies associated it with poor outcomes (survival or pathological features such as lymph node disease, vascular/neural invasion in resected tumors), while others have concluded that it is a good prognostic marker. The examination of expression level threshold (5%, 10%, or 25%) and the detected region (apical vs. cytoplasmic) were variable among the studies. The maturation stage and glycoform of MUC5AC detected also differed with the Monoclonal antibody (Mab) employed for IHC. CLH2 detects less mature/less glycosylated versions while 45M1 or 21-1 detect mature/more glycosylated forms. Interestingly, aberrantly glycosylated variants of MUC5AC were detected using lectin assays (Wheat Germ Agglutinin-MUC5AC), and Mabs such as NPC-1C and PAM4 have are more specific to malignant pancreatic tissues. NPC-1C and PAM4 antibody reactive epitopes on MUC5AC are immunogenic and could represent specific changes on the native MUC5AC glycoprotein linked to carcinogenesis. It was never studied to predict treatment response.

• The nonspecific anticancer mechanism of action and the consistently favorable toxicity profile of TTFields represent a solid basis for their utilization as a cancer agnostic modality in various combination regimens. • The highly anticipated results of the ongoing phase II & III trials for thoracic and abdominal cavity cancers have the potential to be practice-changing, as was the case in the GBM studies. • Future directions in the study of TTFields will focus on biologically optimized treatment combinations to harness the maximum benefit of the modality based on improved understanding of intracellular and intercellular responses to TTFields, such as the induced autophagy and immunomodulation.

The optimal treatment for stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) remains undefined. Recently, wide local excision alone was found to have comparable survival to those treated with chemoradiation (CRT). Given that local excision may be sufficient for the treatment of stage I SCCA, we hypothesized that radiation therapy (RT) alone, compared to CRT would result in equivalent overall survival (OS) in this population. We identified non-surgically treated patients with stage I SCCA from the National Cancer Database from 2004–2015. We included only patients treated either with CRT (45–59.4 Gy with chemotherapy initiated within 14 days of RT) or RT alone (45–59.4 Gy with no chemotherapy). The primary endpoint was OS between CRT and RT patients. Propensity-score matched (PSM) analysis was performed to determine the effect of concurrent chemotherapy on OS using a Cox proportional hazards model with robust standard error to account for clustering in matched pairs. We identified 3552 stage I patients treated with CRT and 287 treated with RT. Compared to patients treated with CRT, those that received RT were more likely to be ≥70 years old (33.1% vs. 19.7%, p < 0.001) and less likely to be female (63.1% vs. 71.0%, p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with a Charlson-Deyo score of 0 was similar in both groups (80.8% RT vs. 82.7% CRT, p = 0.164). The PSM cohort consisted of 287 pairs of patients with median follow-up 48.3 months (interquartile range, 24.4–85.1 months) and 151 deaths (86 RT, 65 CRT). CRT was associated with a 31% reduction in the risk of death (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.50–0.95, p = 0.023). We found that CRT was associated with improved OS, compared to RT alone, in patients with non-surgically treated stage I SCCA. These data suggest that de-intensification of therapy in stage I SCCA must be used with caution. However, given the retrospective nature of the data, prospective trials are required.