Antonio Tufano

Dr. Antonio Tufano


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 February 2024 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Savio Domenico PandolfoSavio Domenico Pandolfo
Savio Domenico Pandolfo
ZWZhenjie Wu
Zhenjie Wu
RCRiccardo Campi
Riccardo Campi
Riccardo BertoloRiccardo Bertolo
Riccardo Bertolo
DADaniele Amparore
Daniele Amparore
AAAchille Aveta
Achille Aveta
Background: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly being employed in the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and it is expanding in the field of complex renal tumors. The aim of this systematic review was to consolidate and assess the results of RAPN when dealing with entirely central hilar masses and to examine the various methods used to address the surgical difficulties associated with them. Methods: A thorough literature search in September 2023 across various databases focused on RAPN for renal hilar masses, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The primary goal was to evaluate RAPN’s surgical and functional outcomes, with a secondary aim of examining different surgical techniques. Out of 1250 records, 13 full-text manuscripts were reviewed. Results: Evidence is growing in favor of RAPN for renal hilar masses. Despite a predominance of retrospective studies and a lack of long-term data, RAPN shows positive surgical outcomes and preserves renal function without compromising cancer treatment effectiveness. Innovative suturing and clamping methods are emerging in surgical management. Conclusions: RAPN is a promising technique for managing renal hilar masses in RCC, offering effective surgical outcomes and renal function preservation. The study highlights the need for more long-term data and prospective studies to further validate these findings.

12 May 2022 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ATAntonio Tufano
Antonio Tufano
FDFrancesco Maria Drudi
Francesco Maria Drudi
FAFlavia Angelini
Flavia Angelini
EPEleonora Polito
Eleonora Polito
MMMilvia Martino
Milvia Martino
VCVito Cantisani
Vito Cantisani
Background: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in characterizing between malignant and benign renal lesions confirmed by histological examination. Methods: Overall, 110 patients, for a total of 118 renal masses previously identified at CT and MRI underwent CEUS. An expert radiologist evaluated morphological, qualitative and quantitative parameters. Acquired data were analyzed to assess the value of each parameter to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions. Results: Histological results of 118 renal masses showed 88 (75%) malignant lesions and 30 (25%) benign lesions. Among morphological features, inhomogeneous echogenicity was the best predictor of malignancy depicting a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 76%, 76%, 88% and 57%, respectively. Among qualitative parameters, the most reliable parameter was the presence of pseudo-capsule. Here, sensitivity, specificity, positive PPV and NPV were 85%, 86%, 94% and 71%, respectively. Among quantitative parameters, the most reliable parameters were peak intensity (PI) and the area under the (AUC) with sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV values of 94%, 92%, 96% and 87% and 99%, 92%, 97% and 97%, respectively. Finally, the most reliable parameters were combined to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. The best combination obtained was restricted to CEUS parameters (PI and AUC). Here, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy rate were 93%, 100%, 100%, 83% and 93%, respectively. Conclusions: CEUS increases the US accuracy to discriminate between benign and malignant renal lesions.

28 March 2024 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAchille Aveta
Achille Aveta
VIVincenzo Iossa
Vincenzo Iossa
GSGianluca Spena
Gianluca Spena
PCPaolo Conforti
Paolo Conforti
GPGiovanni Pagano
Giovanni Pagano
Savio Domenico PandolfoSavio Domenico Pandolfo
Savio Domenico Pandolfo
This review focuses on ablative techniques for small renal masses (SRMs), including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CA), microwave ablation (MWA), and irreversible electroporation (IRE), and discusses recurrence management. Through an extensive literature review, we outline the procedures, outcomes, and follow-up strategies associated with each ablative method. The review provides a detailed examination of these techniques—RFA, CA, MWA, and IRE—elucidating their respective outcomes. Recurrence rates vary among them, with RFA and CA showing comparable rates, MWA demonstrating favorable short-term results, and IRE exhibiting promise in experimental stages. For managing recurrences, various strategies are considered, including active surveillance, re-ablation, or salvage surgery. Surveillance is preferred post-RFA and post-CA, due to slow SRM growth, while re-ablation, particularly with RFA and CA, is deemed feasible without additional complications. Salvage surgery emerges as a viable option for larger or resistant tumors. While ablative techniques offer short-term results comparable to surgery, further research is essential to understand their long-term effects fully. Decisions concerning recurrence management should consider individual and tumor-specific factors. Imaging, notably contrast-enhanced ultrasounds, plays a pivotal role in assessing treatment success, emphasizing the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach for optimal outcomes. The lack of randomized trials highlights the need for further research.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ATAntonio Tufano
Antonio Tufano
PDPiervito Dipinto
Piervito Dipinto
FPFrancesco Passaro
Francesco Passaro
Umberto AnceschiUmberto Anceschi
Umberto Anceschi
GFGiorgio Franco
Giorgio Franco
CLCostantino cl Leonardo
Costantino cl Leonardo
Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze the predictive value of the Fournier gangrene severity index (FGSI), the simplified FGSI (SFGSI), and the Uludag FGSI (UFGSI) on mortality in patients affected by Fournier’s Gangrene (FG). Methods: A search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, from January 2000 to May 2023, to identify original cohorts comparing data between surviving and non-surviving FG patients. The statistical analysis consisted of two parts. First, the mean and standard deviation (SD) of the FGSI, SFGSI, and UFGSI at admission were extrapolated from each study, and the pooled mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was obtained using the Der Simonian–Laird random-effect model. Second, to evaluate the accuracy of the FGSI, SFGSI, and UFSGI in predicting mortality, true positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN), and false negative (FN) values were extracted where possible and reported in 2 × 2 contingency tables. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values were pooled, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were constructed. Results: Overall, forty studies comprising 2257 patients were included. The pooled analysis revealed that the FGSI, SFGSI, and UFGSI values at admission were higher in non-survivors than survivors (MD: 5.53 (95% CI: 4.68–6.37); MD: 2.41 (95% CI: 1.06–3.77); and MD: 5.47 (95% CI: 3.68–7.26), respectively). Moreover, the AUC values of the FGSI, SFGSI, and UFGSI were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.92), 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80–0.87), and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96), respectively. Conclusions: The higher scores of the FGSI, SFGSI, and UFGSI on admission were associated with mortality. Moreover, when comparing accuracy rates, the UFGSI exhibited the highest AUC value.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ATAntonio Tufano
Antonio Tufano
MFMarco Frisenda
Marco Frisenda
ARAntonio Rossi
Antonio Rossi
PVPietro Viscuso
Pietro Viscuso
GMGuglielmo Mantica
Guglielmo Mantica
Alessandro CalarcoAlessandro Calarco
Alessandro Calarco
Objective: Pre-operative assessment of renal stones is essential in selecting treatment options and achieving high success rates for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Several nephrolithometric scoring systems have been developed using pre-operative clinical data and stone characteristics. Resorlu-Unsal stone score (RUSS) is composed of four different parameters, and each of them adds 1 point to the final score. One point is added in patients with stone size > 20 mm, lower calyceal stones and infundibulo-pelvic angle < 45°, stone number > 1, and abnormal anatomy, respec-tively. RUSS categorizes patients into four distinct groups and aims to predict stone-free rates (SFR) after RIRS. We externally validated RUSS and evaluated its predictive accuracy.Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent RIRS for renal stones between January 2020 and December 2021. Patient age, pre-operative hydronephrosis, stone size, stone density as Hounsfield Unit(HU), operative time and RUSS were investigated as potential preoperative predictive factors for stone-free status. RUSS was applied to all patients, and the nomogram was externally vali-dated. Area under the curve (AUC) was used for clinical validity assessment.Results: The present study included a total of 79 patients. Mean patient age was 55.1 ± 15.4 years with a mean stone size was 14.2 ± 4.4 mm. Overall, 62/79 (78.4%) patients were stone free after the initial treatment. After applying RUSS, 36 (45.6%), 29 (36.7%), 10 (12.6%), and 4 (5.1%) patients had a score of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. On multivariate logistic regression RUSS (OR = 0.220; 95%CI: 0.086-0.567; p = 0.002) was identified as the only predictor of postoperative stone-free status.Conclusions: RUSS is a user-friendly scoring system that may predict postoperative stone-free rate after RIRS with great effi-cacy and accuracy.

27 September 2021 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ATAntonio Tufano
Antonio Tufano
RFRocco Simone Flammia
Rocco Simone Flammia
LALuca Antonelli
Luca Antonelli
RMRocco Minelli
Rocco Minelli
GFGiorgio Franco
Giorgio Franco
VCVito Cantisani
Vito Cantisani
Ultrasound (US) still represents the mainstay of scrotal imaging. However, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a relatively novel, but increasingly utilized diagnostic modality. In consequence, we performed a systematic review (SR) and pooled meta-analysis to investigate the diagnostic performance of CEUS in the evaluation of testicular masses (TM). A SR up to June 2021 was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The diagnostic performance of CEUS was evaluated basing on two different endpoints: neoplastic vs. non-neoplastic and malignant vs. benign TM. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) from eligible studies were pooled and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were constructed for each endpoint. Overall, six qualified studies were deemed suitable for this meta-analysis. Diagnostic performance of CEUS showed an accuracy of 0.96 in detecting neoplastic masses (sensitivity of 0.89, PPV of 0.85, specificity of 0.62, and NPV of 0.69) and an accuracy of 0.96 in detecting malignant masses (sensitivity of 0.86, PPV of 0.73, specificity of 0.87, and NPV of 0.91). Taken together, CEUS may represent a promising minimally invasive diagnostic tool for characterization of TM, since it allows clinicians to identify neoplastic lesions and exclude malignant tumor.