Costantino cl Leonardo

Prof. Costantino cl Leonardo

Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, 00185 Rome, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2020 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Francesco Del GiudiceFrancesco Del Giudice
Francesco Del Giudice
GBGiovanni Barchetti
Giovanni Barchetti
EBEttore De Berardinis
Ettore De Berardinis
MPMartina Pecoraro
Martina Pecoraro
VSVincenzo Salvo
Vincenzo Salvo
VPValeria Panebianco
Valeria Panebianco

11 August 2014 in BMC Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMCeleste De Monte
Celeste De Monte
Simone CarradoriSimone Carradori
Simone Carradori
AGArianna Granese
Arianna Granese
GPGiovanni Battista Di Pierro
Giovanni Battista Di Pierro
CLCostantino cl Leonardo
Costantino cl Leonardo
CNCosimo De Nunzio
Cosimo De Nunzio
Bioactive compounds from plants (i.e., Serenoa repens) are often used in medicine in the treatment of several pathologies, among which benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) associated to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

19 March 2024 in Clinics and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBEugenio Bologna
Eugenio Bologna
FDFrancesco Ditonno
Francesco Ditonno
LLLeslie Claire Licari
Leslie Claire Licari
AFAntonio Franco
Antonio Franco
Celeste ManfrediCeleste Manfredi
Celeste Manfredi
GFGiorgio Franco
Giorgio Franco
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) management is moving towards patient-tailored strategies. Advances in molecular and genetic profiling of tumor tissues, integrated with clinical risk assessments, provide deeper insights into disease aggressiveness. This study aims to offer a comprehensive overview of the pivotal genomic tests supporting PCa treatment decisions, analyzing—through real-world data—trends in their use and the growth of supporting literature evidence. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the extensive PearlDiver™ Mariner database, which contains de-identified patient records, in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were employed to identify patients diagnosed with PCa during the study period—2011 to 2021. We determined the utilization of primary tissue-based genetic tests (Oncocyte DX®, Prolaris®, Decipher®, and ProMark®) across all patients diagnosed with PCa. Subsequently, within the overall PCa cohort, patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) and received genetic testing postoperatively were identified. The yearly distribution of these tests and the corresponding trends were illustrated with graphs. Results: During the study period, 1,561,203 patients with a PCa diagnosis were recorded. Of these, 20,748 underwent tissue-based genetic testing following diagnosis, representing 1.3% of the total cohort. An increasing trend was observed in the use of all genetic tests. Linear regression analysis showed a statistically significant increase over time in the use of individual tests (all p-values < 0.05). Among the patients who underwent RP, 3076 received genetic analysis following surgery, representing 1.27% of this group. Conclusions: Our analysis indicates a growing trend in the utilization of tissue-based genomic testing for PCa. Nevertheless, they are utilized in less than 2% of PCa patients, whether at initial diagnosis or after surgical treatment. Although it is anticipated that their use may increase as more scientific evidence becomes available, their role requires further elucidation.

12 May 2016 in BMC Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GFGiorgio Franco
Giorgio Franco
FSFilomena Scarselli
Filomena Scarselli
VCValentina Casciani
Valentina Casciani
CNCosimo De Nunzio
Cosimo De Nunzio
DDDonato Dente
Donato Dente
EGErmanno Greco
Ermanno Greco
The purpose of the study was to investigate whether micro-TESE can improve sperm retrieval rate (SRR) compared to conventional single TESE biopsy on the same testicle or to contralateral multiple TESE, by employing a novel stepwise micro-TESE approach in a population of poor prognosis patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Sixty-four poor prognosis NOA men undergoing surgical testicular sperm retrieval for ICSI, from March 2007 to April 2013, were included in this study. Patients inclusion criteria were a) previous unsuccessful TESE, b) unfavorable histology (SCOS, MA, sclerahyalinosis), c) Klinefelter syndrome. We employed a stepwise micro-TESE consisting three-steps: 1) single conventional TESE biopsy; 2) micro-TESE on the same testis; 3) contralateral multiple TESE. SRR was 28.1 % (18/64). Sperm was obtained in both the initial single conventional TESE and in the following micro-TESE. The positive or negative sperm retrieval was further confirmed by a contralateral multiple TESE, when performed. No significant pre-operative predictors of sperm retrieval, including patients’ age, previous negative TESE or serological markers (LH, FSH, inhibin B), were observed at univariate or multivariate analysis. Micro-TESE (step 2) did not improve sperm retrieval as compared to single TESE biopsy on the same testicle (step 1) or multiple contralateral TESE (step 3). Stepwise micro-TESE could represent an optimal approach for sperm retrieval in NOA men. In our view, it should be offered to NOA patients in order to gradually increase surgical invasiveness, when necessary. Stepwise micro-TESE might also reduce the costs, time and efforts involved in surgery.

18 January 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLCostantino cl Leonardo
Costantino cl Leonardo
RFRocco Simone Flammia
Rocco Simone Flammia
SLSara Lucciola
Sara Lucciola
FPFlavia Proietti
Flavia Proietti
MPMartina Pecoraro
Martina Pecoraro
VPValeria Panebianco
Valeria Panebianco
Background: Current cross-sectional imaging modalities exhibit heterogenous diagnostic performances for the detection of a lymph node invasion (LNI) in bladder cancer (BCa) patients. Recently, the Node-RADS score was introduced to provide a standardized comprehensive evaluation of LNI, based on a five-item Likert scale accounting for both size and configuration criteria. In the current study, we hypothesized that the Node-RADS score accurately predicts the LNI and tested its diagnostic performance. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed BCa patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) and bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection, from January 2019 to June 2022. Patients receiving preoperative systemic chemotherapy were excluded. A logistic regression analysis tested the correlation between the Node-RADS score and LNI both at patient and lymph-node level. The ROC curves and the AUC depicted the overall diagnostic performance. In addition, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for different cut-off values (>1, >2, >3, >4). Results: Overall, data from 49 patients were collected. Node-RADS assigned on CT scans images, was found to independently predict the LNI after an adjusted multivariable regression analysis, both at the patient (OR 3.36, 95%CI 1.68–9.40, p = 0.004) and lymph node (OR 5.18, 95%CI 3.39–8.64, p < 0.001) levels. Node-RADS exhibited an AUC of 0.87 and 0.91 at the patient and lymph node levels, respectively. With increasing Node-RADS cut-off values, the specificity and PPV increased from 57.1 to 97.1% and from 48.3 to 83.3%, respectively. Conversely, the sensitivity and NPV decreased from 100 to 35.7% and from 100 to 79.1%, respectively. Similar trends were recorded at the lymph node level. Potentially, Node-RADS > 2 could be considered as the best cut-off value due to balanced values at both the patient (77.1 and 78.6%, respectively) and lymph node levels (82.4 and 93.4%, respectively). Conclusions: The current study lays the foundation for the introduction of Node-RADS for the regional lymph-node evaluation in BCa patients. Interestingly, the Node-RADS score exhibited a moderate-to-high overall accuracy for the identification of LNI, with the possibility of setting different cut-off values according to specific clinical scenarios. However, these results need to be validated on larger cohorts before drawing definitive conclusions.

1 June 2018 in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CNCosimo De Nunzio
Cosimo De Nunzio
Antonio Luigi PastoreAntonio Luigi Pastore
Antonio Luigi Pastore
Riccardo LombardoRiccardo Lombardo
Riccardo Lombardo
GSGiuseppe Simone
Giuseppe Simone
CLCostantino cl Leonardo
Costantino cl Leonardo
ATAndrea Tubaro
Andrea Tubaro