To examine the evolution of hypertension management and blood pressure (BP) control in Spain in the last decade across PRESCAP 2002, 2006 and 2010. The methodology of the three studies was the same. They were multicenter and cross-sectional surveys aimed to determine BP control rates in hypertensive patients in primary care in Spain during 2002, 2006 and 2010, respectively. In each study, patients at least 18 years, with an established diagnosis of hypertension were included. Adequate BP control was defined as BP less than 140/90 mmHg in the general population (<130/85 mmHg in PRESCAP 2002 and less than 130/80 mmHg in PRESCAP 2006 and PRESCAP 2010 for patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular disease). A total of 12,754 patients (mean age 63.3 ± 10.8 years; 57.2% women), 10,520 patients (64.6 ± 11.3 years; 53.7% women) and 12,961 patients (66.3 ± 11.4; 52.0% women) were included in PRESCAP 2002, PRESCAP 2006 and PRESCAP 2010 studies respectively. With regard to BP control rates, 36.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 35.2-36.9%], 41.4% (95% CI 40.5-42.4%) and 46.3% of patients (95% CI 45.4-47.1%) achieved BP goals in PRESCAP 2002, PRESCAP 2006 and PRESCAP 2010, respectively (P < 0.0001). In PRESCAP 2002, 56% of patients were on monotherapy, 35.6% were taking two drugs and 8.4% at least three drugs. In PRESCAP 2006 these numbers were 44.4, 41.1 and 14.5%, respectively, and in PRESCAP 2010 they were 36.4, 44.1 and 19.5%, respectively (P < 0.0001). BP control rates have improved in Spain from 2002 to 2010. This may be related, at least in part, with the higher use of antihypertensive treatment, particularly combined therapy.

Objective: To determine the therapeutic behavior of primary care physicians in uncontrolled hypertensive patients in Spain during the last decade. Methods: Data were taken from three cross-sectional surveys aimed to determine the blood pressure (BP) control rates in treated hypertensive patients followed in a setting of primary care in Spain during 2002, 2006, and 2010, respectively. Adequate BP control was globally defined as BP lower than 140/90 mmHg for the hypertensive population in the three studies. In patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or cardiovascular disease, BP control was established as lower than 130/85 mmHg in PRESión arterial en la población Española en los Centros de Atención Primaria (PRESCAP) 2002 and lower than 130/80 mmHg in PRESCAP 2006 and 2010. Results: A total of 12 754, 10 520, and 12 961 patients were included in PRESCAP 2002, 2006, and 2010 studies. Of them, 36.1, 41.4, and 46.3%, respectively, achieved BP targets. In those patients with uncontrolled BP, physicians modified the treatment in 18.3, 30.4, and 41.4% of the cases, respectively (P = 0.0001). The most frequent action taken was the change to another drug in PRESCAP 2002 (47.0%), and the addition of other antihypertensive agent in PRESCAP 2006 and 2010 (46.3 and 55.6%, respectively). Predictors of therapeutic inertia were the physicians’ perception of BP control, being on treatment with combined therapy, and the absence of risk factors or cardiovascular disease. Conclusion: Although therapeutic inertia has decreased in the last years in primary care setting in Spain, nowadays in nearly 60% of patients with uncontrolled BP, no therapeutic action is actually taken. Therefore, despite a significant improvement, therapeutic inertia still remains a relevant clinical problem in hypertension general practice.