Biagio Fernando Giannetti

Dr. Biagio Fernando Giannetti

Universidade Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2015 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BGBiagio Fernando Giannetti
Biagio Fernando Giannetti
Feni AgostinhoFeni Agostinho
Feni Agostinho
CAC.M.V.B. Almeida
C.M.V.B. Almeida
DHD. Huisingh
D. Huisingh

1 January 2006 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BGBiagio Fernando Giannetti
Biagio Fernando Giannetti
FBF.A. Barrella
F.A. Barrella
CACecilia Maria Villas Boas de Almeida
Cecilia Maria Villas Boas de Almeida

1 January 2010 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBSilvia H Bonilla
Silvia H Bonilla
CACecilia Maria Villas Boas de Almeida
Cecilia Maria Villas Boas de Almeida
BGBiagio Fernando Giannetti
Biagio Fernando Giannetti
DHDonald Huisingh
Donald Huisingh

1 May 2013 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CACecilia Maria Villas Boas de Almeida
Cecilia Maria Villas Boas de Almeida
SBSilvia H Bonilla
Silvia H Bonilla
BGBiagio Fernando Giannetti
Biagio Fernando Giannetti
DHD. Huisingh
D. Huisingh

13 August 2019 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LCLuca Coscieme
Luca Coscieme
Paul SuttonPaul Sutton
Paul Sutton
LMLars F. Mortensen
Lars F. Mortensen
Ida KubiszewskiIda Kubiszewski
Ida Kubiszewski
Robert CostanzaRobert Costanza
Robert Costanza
LFLorenzo Fioramonti
Lorenzo Fioramonti
Increasingly, empirical evidence refutes many of the theoretical pillars of mainstream economics. These theories have persisted despite the fact that they support unsustainable and undesirable environmental, social, and economic outcomes. Continuing to embrace them puts at risk the possibility of achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and overcoming other global challenges. We discuss a selection of paradoxes and delusions surrounding mainstream economic theories related to: (1) efficiency and resource use, (2) wealth and wellbeing, (3) economic growth, and (4) the distribution of wealth within and between rich and poor nations. We describe a wellbeing economy as an alternative for guiding policy development. In 2018, a network of Wellbeing Economy Governments (WEGo), (supported by, but distinct from, the larger Wellbeing Economy Alliance—WEAll) promoting new forms of governance that diverge from the ones on which the G7 and G20 are based, has been launched and is now a living project. Members of WEGo aim at advancing the three key principles of a wellbeing economy: Live within planetary ecological boundaries, ensure equitable distribution of wealth and opportunity, and efficiently allocate resources (including environmental and social public goods), bringing wellbeing to the heart of policymaking, and in particular economic policymaking. This network has potential to fundamentally re-shape current global leadership still anchored to old economic paradigms that give primacy to economic growth over environmental and social wealth and wellbeing.

1 June 2015 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CACecilia Maria Villas Boas de Almeida
Cecilia Maria Villas Boas de Almeida
Feni AgostinhoFeni Agostinho
Feni Agostinho
BGBiagio Fernando Giannetti
Biagio Fernando Giannetti
DHD. Huisingh
D. Huisingh