Purpose: Flow-diverter (FD) stents have become an established treatment for intracranial aneurysms in recent years, but their use for aneurysms in distal cerebral vessels with small carrier vessel diameters remains controversial. This study describes the method and mid- and long-term outcomes of FD treatment of distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms (DACAAs) at two neurointerventional centers, to elucidate this topic and provide more in-depth data.Methods: Data for all patients at two neurointerventional centers who were treated with FDs for DACAAs in the pericallosal and supracallosal segment of the anterior cerebral artery were retrospectively analyzed. Data on periprocedural complications, and short-, mid- and long-term follow-up findings were recorded.Results: Forty-one patients were eligible for inclusion in the study. Three FD models were used, one of which had an anti-thrombotic coating. Two periprocedural complications (5%) occurred but did not cause a change in the mRS. In the long-term follow-up, at 29 months and beyond, 83% of assessable patients showed complete occlusion of the aneurysms without new neurological deficits.Conclusion: FDs are a safe and effective treatment approach for DACAAs. This study indicated a low risk of complications, and high closure rates in short-, mid- and long-term follow-up.

Background: The optimal treatment approach for patients with severe atherosclerotic vertebral artery ostial stenosis (VAOS) is not yet supported by evidence from large-scale studies. Even with optimal medical treatment and effective risk factor management, substantial numbers of patients experience symptoms or recurrent strokes. Endovascular treatment is a potential solution, particularly when medicinal therapy alone is insufficient for symptom and stroke risk reduction. This study was aimed at assessing the safety and effectiveness of stent angioplasty in patients with VAOS. Methods: This single-centre retrospective analysis included 564 procedures in 525 patients (symptomatic n=265, without recent symptoms n=260; 72.2% male; median age: 70 years; stenosis >75% n=371) who underwent stenting for atherosclerotic VAOS between 2008 and 2022. Vertebrobasilar tandem lesions and dissections were excluded. Digital subtraction angiography was performed in all patients during the follow-up. Patients’ characteristics, periprocedural and postprocedural neurological events, and follow-up data were evaluated. Results: Stenting was successfully performed in all cases. The in-hospital stroke rate was 0.6% (disabling n=2; non-disabling n=1). No ipsilateral stroke or treatment-associated deaths occurred during a mean follow-up period of 56 months (min.–max., 9–183 months). In-stent restenosis >50% was found in 89 (15.8%) implanted stents, with the majority (70 out of 89) diagnosed within the first year, at a median time of 7 months. Conclusions: Stent angioplasty was demonstrated to be a safe and feasible option for patients with VAOS, with a low risk of periprocedural stroke and symptom recurrence, and favourable stent patency rates at mid-term and long-term follow-up.

Purpose Although flow diverters (FDs) revolutionized the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs), clinically silent microinfarcts (SMs) are consistently detected in postprocedural diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and their clinical consequences remain unknown. This study examined the incidence of, and factors associated with, SM development after the use of two surface-modified FDs: the p48MW-HPC and p64MW-HPC. Methods A non-concurrent cohort study was conducted in 404 consecutive patients with UIAs treated with these two FDs between January 2020 and July 2023. The primary endpoint was the number of asymptomatic DWI lesions within 72 h after the procedure. Results SMs were detected in 58.2% of the cases, and ≥ 20 lesions were identified in 7.2% of cases. Multivariate analysis revealed that the use of two specific types of microcatheters—Prowler Select Plus (P < 0.001; IRR, 3.2) and RapidTransit (P = 0.001; IRR, 2.2)—and difficulty in microcatheter navigation to the target vessel (P = 0.039; IRR, 1.8) were significantly associated with greater numbers of lesions. After exclusion of outlier cases, these devices remained associated with a significant 2‑ to 3‑fold increase in SMs. Diabetes was associated with fewer SMs (P = 0.024; IRR, 0.5), although this association disappeared after exclusion of outlier cases. Conclusion The postprocedural incidence of SMs associated with hydrophilic polymer-coated FDs was similar to that previously reported. Interestingly, the main factor contributing to this phenomenon was the use of certain microcatheters. Careful device selection is crucial, and further research is needed to improve the safety of neurovascular interventions.

Background: Drug-coated balloons (DCB) are an established tool in the prevention and treatment of coronary and peripheral artery restenosis. The underlying effects of restenosis resemble those in the neurovascular field, yet data on the use of DCB in cervical and intracranial arteries is rare. Methods: Medline, and international and major national guidelines and recommendations were systematically searched for data addressing the use of DCB in the neurovascular setting. Results: Of the 1448 relevant records found in Medline, 166 publications were considered for this review. Conclusions: Data on the use of DCB in the neurovascular setting show a possible benefit over preceding alternatives, such as self-expanding stents, and balloon-mounted or drug-eluting stents. Nonetheless, the role of DCB remains under-researched, and publications remain lacking.

Purpose: Endovascular and surgical treatments of stenosis of the extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) are common procedures, yet both introduce a risk of restenosis due to endothelial hyperplasia. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are designed to decrease neointimal hyperplasia, however rarely used in the neurovascular setting. This study retrospectively analyzes mid-term results of DCB-treated in-stent restenosis (ISR) of the ICA. Materials and Methods: The medical history, comorbidities, and periprocedural data of patients receiving DCB treatment for > 50% ISR of the ICA after carotid artery stenting were analyzed. Follow-up after DCB treatment was performed with Doppler ultrasound. Suspicious cases were checked with CT- or MR-angiography and—if there was agreement between the modalities—validated with digital subtraction angiography. Potential risk factors for restenosis and differences in outcomes after PTA with three types of DCB balloons were evaluated. Results: DCB treatment was performed in 109 cases, 0.9% of which involved in-hospital major stroke; no minor strokes occurred. A total of 17 patients (15.6%) had recurrent ISR after DCB treatment, after a mean time of 30.2 months (7–85 months). Tobacco use was significantly associated with a higher incidence of recurrent ISR. Conclusion: DCB angioplasty for ISR is an effective treatment that may delay and decrease restenosis. Treating comorbidities and adopting lifestyle changes may additionally help prevent ISR. Graphical

Cervical artery dissection (CAD) is a frequent cause of stroke in young adults. Previous studies investigating the efficiency of anticoagulation (AC) versus antiplatelet therapy (AT) found an insignificant difference. We therefore retrospectively evaluated a combination of AC plus AT in patients with acute CAD regarding safety and efficacy. Twenty-eight patients with CAD and minor neurological symptoms/no major infarction received either single (n = 14) or dual AT (n = 14) combined with AC. Angiographic follow-up during hospitalization, 4-8 weeks and 3–6 months after CAD focused on occlusion, residual stenosis, and functional recanalization. Possible adverse events were surveyed. We compared the AC plus AT group to 22 patients with acute CAD treated with AC or AT. Compared to preceding AC-/AT-only studies, AC plus single or dual AT resulted in more frequent, faster recanalization. Frequency and severity of adverse events was comparable. No major adverse events or death occurred. Preceding works on conservative treatment of CAD are discussed and compared to this study. Considerations are given to pathophysiology and the dynamic of CAD. Combining AC plus AT in CAD may result in more reliable recanalization in a shorter time. The risk for adverse events appears similar to treatment with only AC or AT.