Clara Camarasa

Dr. Clara Camarasa

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 June 2022 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCClara Camarasa
Clara Camarasa
ÉMÉrika Mata
Érika Mata
JNJuan Pablo Jiménez Navarro
Juan Pablo Jiménez Navarro
JRJanet Reyna
Janet Reyna
PBPaula Bezerra
Paula Bezerra
KYKatarina Yaramenka
Katarina Yaramenka
Buildings play a key role in the transition to a low-carbon-energy system and in achieving Paris Agreement climate targets. Analyzing potential scenarios for building decarbonization in different socioeconomic contexts is a crucial step to develop national and transnational roadmaps to achieve global emission reduction targets. This study integrates building stock energy models for 32 countries across four continents to create carbon emission mitigation reference scenarios and decarbonization scenarios by 2050, covering 60% of today’s global building emissions. These decarbonization pathways are compared to those from global models. Results demonstrate that reference scenarios are in all countries insufficient to achieve substantial decarbonization and lead, in some regions, to significant increases, i.e., China and South America. Decarbonization scenarios lead to substantial carbon reductions within the range projected in the 2 °C scenario but are still insufficient to achieve the decarbonization goals under the 1.5 °C scenario.

1 July 2021 in Energy and Built Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CCClara Camarasa
Clara Camarasa
KKKalahasthi Kumar
Kalahasthi Kumar
Leonardo RosadoLeonardo Rosado
Leonardo Rosado

2 April 2020 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCClara Camarasa
Clara Camarasa
RHRaphael Heiberger
Raphael Heiberger
LHLena Hennes
Lena Hennes
MJMartin Jakob
Martin Jakob
YOYork Ostermeyer
York Ostermeyer
Leonardo RosadoLeonardo Rosado
Leonardo Rosado
With regard to residential energy use in the European Union (EU), most studies consider potential adopters of the technology (e.g., private owners) as being the sole decision-makers in the technology selection. However, during an integrated decision-making process (e.g., a construction project) multiple stakeholders will interact, influencing each other’s judgement, thereby making it difficult to discern who is affecting the final decision, and to what extent. The goal of this study is to outline the full network of stakeholders involved in the decision-making process, along with their degree of power and interaction in the technology choice. For this purpose, empirical evidence from a multi-country survey is examined using social network analysis (SNA). The information is compared across building typologies, project types and countries (i.e., Italy, Spain, Germany, Poland, the United Kingdom, France, Belgium and the Netherlands). The results demonstrate that, in EU residential buildings, potential adopters of the technology are not the only stakeholders involved in the technology selection. They are in all instances in communication with multiple stakeholders, some of whom also hold a high level of power in the decision (i.e., key persuaders). Furthermore, their level of power and communication varies substantially across building typologies, project types and countries.

16 June 2021 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCClara Camarasa
Clara Camarasa
KKKalahasthi Kumar
Kalahasthi Kumar
ISIvan Sanchez-Diaz
Ivan Sanchez-Diaz
Leonardo RosadoLeonardo Rosado
Leonardo Rosado
LHLena Hennes
Lena Hennes
IHIan Hamilton
Ian Hamilton
Cross-country evidence on the adoption of energy-efficient retrofit measures (EERMs) in residential buildings is critical to supporting the development of national and pan-European policies aimed at fostering the energy performance upgrade of the building stock. In this light, the aim of this paper is to advance in the understanding of the probability of certain EERMs taking place in eight EU countries, according to a set of parameters, such as building typology, project types, and motivation behind the project. Using these parameters collected via a multi-country online survey, a set of discrete-choice (conditional logit) models are estimated on the probability of selecting a choice of any combination of 33 EERMs across the sampled countries. Results show that actions related to the building envelope are the most often-addressed across countries and single building elements or technology measures have a higher probability of being implemented. The modelling framework developed in this study contributes to the scientific community in three ways: (1) establishing an empirical relationship among EERMs and project (i.e., retrofit and deep retrofit), (2) identifying commonalities and differences across the selected countries, and (3) quantifying the probabilities and market shares of various EERMs.

1 June 2023 in Energy and Built Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CCClara Camarasa
Clara Camarasa
SSSantiago Martinez Santaclara
Santiago Martinez Santaclara
TYTrupti Yargattimath
Trupti Yargattimath
PFPilar Lapuente Fuentes
Pilar Lapuente Fuentes
CPCarolina Riobó Pezoa
Carolina Riobó Pezoa
ZCZhuolun Chen
Zhuolun Chen

5 June 2025 in International Journal of Biometeorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GSGerardo Sanchez
Gerardo Sanchez
CCClara Camarasa
Clara Camarasa
OKOngun Berk Kazanci
Ongun Berk Kazanci