Purpose: Elective neck irradiation (ENI) has long been considered mandatory when treating head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with definitive radiotherapy, but it is associated with significant dose to normal organs-at-risk (OAR). In this prospective phase II study, we investigated the efficacy and tolerability of eliminating ENI and strictly treating involved and suspicious lymph nodes (LN) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Patients and Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed HNSCC of the oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx were eligible for enrollment. Each LN was characterized as involved or suspicious based on radiologic criteria and an in-house artificial intelligence (AI)–based classification model. Gross disease received 70 Gray (Gy) in 35 fractions and suspicious LNs were treated with 66.5 Gy, without ENI. The primary endpoint was solitary elective volume recurrence, with secondary endpoints including patterns-of-failure and patient-reported outcomes. Results: Sixty-seven patients were enrolled, with 18 larynx/hypopharynx and 49 oropharynx cancer. With a median follow-up of 33.4 months, the 2-year risk of solitary elective nodal recurrence was 0%. Gastrostomy tubes were placed in 14 (21%), with median removal after 2.9 months for disease-free patients; no disease-free patient is chronically dependent. Grade I/II dermatitis was seen in 90%/10%. There was no significant decline in composite MD Anderson Dysphagia Index scores after treatment, with means of 89.1 and 92.6 at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Conclusions: These results suggest that eliminating ENI is oncologically sound for HNSCC, with highly favorable quality-of-life outcomes. Additional prospective studies are needed to support this promising paradigm before implementation in any nontrial setting.

Background: The utility of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains poorly defined. Daily ART (DART) promises both anatomic adaptation and planning target volume (PTV) reduction. In this prospective trial using cone-beam computed tomography-based ART, patients with HNSCC undergoing definitive radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were randomly assigned to DART with reduced PTV margins or no ART with standard margins (image-guided RT [IGRT]). Methods: Eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx HNSCC receiving definitive radiotherapy. All individuals received involved nodal radiotherapy per previous institutional study. The PTV margins were 1 mm (2 mm craniocaudal) vs 5 mm in the DART and IGRT arms, respectively. The primary endpoint was patient-reported xerostomia at 1 year, assessed with the Xerostomia Questionnaire (XQ). Results: Fifty patients were enrolled (26 IGRT, 24 DART) between March 2022 and June 2023. The cohort consisted of 38 oropharynx and 12 larynx/hypopharynx patients. The mean ipsilateral parotid gland, ipsilateral and contralateral submandibular gland doses were significantly lower with DART. There was significantly less acute dermatitis in the DART arm (Grade 0/1/2 0%/69%/31% vs 17%/75%/8% DART, P = .01) but no significant difference in any patient-reported outcome at 1 year. The adjusted difference in XQ score at 1 year was 10.0 (95% CI = −4.7 to 24.7, P = .58). Conclusion: Online DART for HNSCC is oncologically sound and improved acute toxicity profiles, but it did not reduce patient-reported xerostomia, the primary endpoint. Additional evidence is needed to understand the potential benefits and limitations of this paradigm, including its cost-effectiveness. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT04883281

•AI dose predictor was fully integrated with treatment planning system and used as a physicain decision support tool to improve uniformity of practice.•Model was trained based on our standard of practice, but implemented at the time of expansion with 3 new physicians join the practice.•Phase 1 retrospective evaluation demonstrated the non-uniform practice among 3 MDs and only 52.9% frequency planner can achieve physicians' directives.•Significant improvement in practice uniformity of practice was observed after utilizing AI as DST and 80.4% frequency clinical plan can achieve AI-guided physician directives.

Recently developed online adaptive radiation therapy (OnART) systems enable frequent treatment plan adaptation, but data supporting a dosimetric benefit in postoperative head and neck radiation therapy (RT) are sparse. We performed an in silico dosimetric study to assess the potential benefits of a single versus weekly OnART in the treatment of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the adjuvant setting. Twelve patients receiving conventionally fractionated RT over 6 weeks and 12 patients receiving hypofractionated RT over 3 weeks on a clinical trial were analyzed. The OnART emulator was used to virtually adapt either once midtreatment or weekly based on the patient's routinely performed cone beam computed tomography. The planning target volume (PTV) coverage, dose heterogeneity, and cumulative dose to the organs at risk for these 2 adaptive approaches were compared with the nonadapted plan. In total, 13, 8, and 3 patients had oral cavity, oropharynx, and larynx primaries, respectively. In the conventionally fractionated RT cohort, weekly OnART led to a significant improvement in PTV V100% coverage (6.2%), hot spot (–1.2 Gy), and maximum cord dose (–3.1 Gy), whereas the mean ipsilateral parotid dose increased modestly (1.8 Gy) versus the nonadapted plan. When adapting once midtreatment, PTV coverage improved with a smaller magnitude (0.2%-2.5%), whereas dose increased to the ipsilateral parotid (1.0-1.1 Gy) and mandible (0.2-0.7 Gy). For the hypofractionated RT cohort, similar benefit was observed with weekly OnART, including significant improvement in PTV coverage, hot spot, and maximum cord dose, whereas no consistent dosimetric advantage was seen when adapting once midtreatment. For head and neck squamous cell carcinoma adjuvant RT, there was a limited benefit of single OnART, but weekly adaptations meaningfully improved the dosimetric criteria, predominantly PTV coverage and dose heterogeneity. A prospective study is ongoing to determine the clinical benefit of OnART in this setting.