Background: The social determinants of health have been widely recognised yet there remains a lack of clarity regarding what constitute the macro-economic determinants of health and what can be done to address them. An umbrella review of systematic reviews was conducted to identify the evidence for the health and health inequalities impact of population level macroeconomic factors, strategies, policies and interventions. Methods: Nine databases were searched for systematic reviews meeting the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) criteria using a novel conceptual framework. Studies were assessed for quality using a standardised instrument and a narrative overview of the findings is presented. Results: The review found a large (n = 62) but low quality systematic review-level evidence base. The results indicated that action to promote employment and improve working conditions can help improve health and reduce gender-based health inequalities. Evidence suggests that market regulation of tobacco, alcohol and food is likely to be effective at improving health and reducing inequalities in health including strong taxation, or restriction of advertising and availability. Privatisation of utilities and alcohol sectors, income inequality, and economic crises are likely to increase health inequalities. Left of centre governments and welfare state generosity may have a positive health impact, but evidence on specific welfare interventions is mixed. Trade and trade policies were found to have a mixed effect. There were no systematic reviews of the health impact of monetary policy or of large economic institutions such as central banks and regulatory organisations. Conclusions: The results of this study provide a simple yet comprehensive framework to support policy-makers and practitioners in addressing the macroeconomic determinants of health. Further research is needed in low and middle income countries and further reviews are needed to summarise evidence in key gaps identified by this review. Trial registration: Protocol for umbrella review prospectively registered with PROSPERO CRD42017068357.

To describe the health and occupational risks of informal waste workers (IWWs) in the Kathmandu Valley and explore the factors associated with not using personal protective equipment (PPE). This is a cross-sectional survey of IWWs. Data were collected on the health and occupational risks of adult IWWs working on waste sites in the Kathmandu Valley and in the adjacent Nuwakot district, Nepal, in November 2017, through convenience sampling. Using a standardized health assessment questionnaire, face-to-face interviews were undertaken to record sociodemographic data, indicators of general and occupational health, data on healthcare access and use, physical risks, perception of occupational risks and use of PPE. Associations between use of PPE and gender, age, education, country of origin, injury and perception of occupational risks were examined using multivariate logistic regression analyses. In 1278 surveyed IWWs, prevalent physical risks included injuries (66.2% in the previous 12 months), and the main reported symptoms were respiratory in nature (69.9% in the previous 3 months). Most prevalent injuries were glass cuts (44.4%) and metal cuts (43.9%). Less than half of the IWWs (46.8%) had been vaccinated against tetanus and 7.5% against hepatitis B. The work was considered as 'risky' by 72.5% of IWWs, but 67.6% did not use PPE. Non-use of PPE was independently associated with male gender (odds ratio [OR] 2.19; P < 0.001), Indian origin (OR 1.35; P = 0.018), older age (OR 2.97 for more than the age of 55 years; P = 0.007) and low perception of occupational risks (OR 2.41; P < 0.001). Low perception of occupational risk was associated with older age (55 + years) and the lack of receipt of information on the risks. IWWs are at increased risk of injury in their work, yet are poorly protected in relation to vaccine-preventable infections and workwear. The results suggest that information is important in relation to perception of occupational risk, which in turn is associated with the use of PPE. There is a need for policymakers and public health practitioners to have a robust understanding of the needs and vulnerabilities of this group, as well as identify effective interventions that can be taken to safeguard the health and welfare of IWWs.

The relationship between child development and adolescent health, and how this may be modified by socio-economic conditions, is poorly understood. This limits cross-sector interventions to address adolescent health inequality. This review summarises evidence on the associations between child development at school starting age and subsequent health in adolescence and identifies factors affecting associations. We undertook a participatory systematic review, searching electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ASSIA and ERIC) for articles published between November 1990 and November 2020. Observational, intervention and review studies reporting a measure of child development and subsequent health outcomes, specifically weight and mental health, were included. Studies were individually and collectively assessed for quality using a comparative rating system of stronger, weaker, inconsistent or limited evidence. Associations between child development and adolescent health outcomes were assessed and reported by four domains of child development (socio-emotional, cognitive, language and communication, and physical development). A conceptual diagram, produced with stakeholders at the outset of the study, acted as a framework for narrative synthesis of factors that modify or mediate associations. Thirty-four studies were included. Analysis indicated stronger evidence of associations between measures of socio-emotional development and subsequent mental health and weight outcomes; in particular, positive associations between early externalising behaviours and later internalising and externalising, and negative associations between emotional wellbeing and later internalising and unhealthy weight. For all other domains of child development, although associations with subsequent health were positive, the evidence was either weaker, inconsistent or limited. There was limited evidence on factors that altered associations. Positive socio-emotional development at school starting age appears particularly important for subsequent mental health and weight in adolescence. More collaborative research across health and education is needed on other domains of development and on the mechanisms that link development and later health, and on how any relationship is modified by socio-economic context.

Background: Giving children the best start in life is critical for their future health and wellbeing. Political devolution in the UK provides a natural experiment to explore how public health systems contribute to children’s early developmental outcomes across four countries. Method: A systematic literature review and input from a stakeholder group was used to develop a public health systems framework. This framework then informed analysis of public health policy approaches to early child development. Results: A total of 118 studies met the inclusion criteria. All national policies championed a ‘prevention approach’ to early child development. Political factors shaped divergence, with variation in national conceptualizations of child development (‘preparing for life’ versus ‘preparing for school’) and pre-school provision (‘universal entitlement’ or ‘earned benefit’). Poverty and resourcing were identified as key system factors that influenced outcomes. Scotland and Wales have enacted distinctive legislation focusing on wider determinants. However, this is limited by the extent of devolved powers. Conclusion: The systems framework clarifies policy complexity relating to early child development. The divergence of child development policies in the four countries and, particularly, the explicit recognition in Scottish and Welsh policy of wider determinants, creates scope for this topic to be a tracer area to compare UK public health systems longer term.

To identify and describe distinct trajectories of cognitive and socioemotional development during childhood and to examine their relationships with adolescent health. We used group-based multitrajectory modeling applied to longitudinal data on 11 564 children up to age 14 years from the UK Millennium Cohort study to identify trajectories of cognitive and socioemotional development measured using validated instruments. We assessed associations between the derived trajectories and baseline socioeconomic, parental, and school factors using multinomial regression. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between trajectory groups and adolescent health at age 14 and 17 years. Four child development trajectories were identified: "no problems" (76.5%); "late socio-emotional problems" (10.1%); "early cognitive and socioemotional problems" (8.6%); and "persistent cognitive and socioemotional problems" (4.8%). Those in the problem trajectories were more socioeconomically disadvantaged. Compared with the "no problem" trajectory, the "late socioemotional problems" trajectory had increased odds of overweight and mental ill-health at age 14 years of 1.50 (95% CI 1.24-1.81) and 2.51 (2.03-3.10), respectively. For the "persistent problems" group, the OR for overweight was 1.41 (1.04-1.91), and for mental ill-health, 3.01 (2.10-3.30). For both groups, the associations persisted to age 17 years. In a representative UK cohort, groups of distinct trajectories of cognitive and socioemotional development were identified. Adverse development, if unresolved, can have a negative impact on weight and mental health in adolescence. Socioemotional development was the main driver of the impact on adolescent health and this requires emphasis in child health policy.

This review aimed to synthesise existing recommendations - issued by either United Nations agencies, scientific societies, governmental health authorities, non-profit organisations, or others - on digital screen exposure in infants, children, and adolescents. Systematic review. A wide search strategy was utilised - including digital databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science), Google, ChatGPT, reference lists from and grey literature —up to July 2024. Identified documents were categorized by type, issuing institutions, audience, publication year, and age groups. A synthesis of recommendations on screen time quantity was provided, comparing recommendations from the World Health Organization (WHO) with those from other institutions/bodies. Out of 85,425 records retrieved, 41 documents were identified. Of these, 23 were published by scientific societies, 13 by government/health authorities, two by the WHO, and three by non-profit organisations. In relation to digital screen quantity, most documents aligned: i) for children under 2 years, most documents recommended zero exposure (n = 20/22); ii) for children aged 2–5 years, the majority recommended limiting screen time to 1 h per day (n = 17/21); iii) for children over 5 years and adolescents, the most permissive guidelines suggested a maximum of 2 h per day (n = 8/10). Existing recommendations were either equally strict or more restrictive than WHO guidelines. In regard to the quality of digital screen exposure, 10 key points emerged, along with additional guidance for parents, schools, healthcare professionals, researchers, and industry. There is consensus on the need to limit the quantity of digital screen time for infants, children and adolescents and to ensure good quality exposure. This alignment provides a strong basis for governments and other bodies to agree on local recommendations, as well as strategies to improve their implementation in practice.