Carol D. Ryff

Prof. Carol D. Ryff

1. Hilldale Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
+2

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 November 2013 in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Carol D. RyffCarol D. Ryff
Carol D. Ryff
This article reviews research and interventions that have grown up around a model of psychological well-being generated more than two decades ago to address neglected aspects of positive functioning such as purposeful engagement in life, realization of personal talents and capacities, and enlightened self-knowledge. The conceptual origins of this formulation are revisited and scientific products emerging from 6 thematic areas are examined: (1) how well-being changes across adult development and later life; (2) what are the personality correlates of well-being; (3) how well-being is linked with experiences in family life; (4) how well-being relates to work and other community activities; (5) what are the connections between well-being and health, including biological risk factors, and (6) via clinical and intervention studies, how psychological well-being can be promoted for ever-greater segments of society. Together, these topics illustrate flourishing interest across diverse scientific disciplines in understanding adults as striving, meaning-making, proactive organisms who are actively negotiating the challenges of life. A take-home message is that increasing evidence supports the health protective features of psychological well-being in reducing risk for disease and promoting length of life. A recurrent and increasingly important theme is resilience - the capacity to maintain or regain well-being in the face of adversity. Implications for future research and practice are considered.

5 October 2006 in Journal of Happiness Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Carol D. RyffCarol D. Ryff
Carol D. Ryff
BSBurton H. Singer
Burton H. Singer

29 September 2004 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Carol D. RyffCarol D. Ryff
Carol D. Ryff
BSBurton H Singer
Burton H Singer
GLGayle Dienberg Love
Gayle Dienberg Love
Two key types of well–being, eudaimonic and hedonic, are reviewed. The first addresses ideas of self–development, personal growth and purposeful engagement, while the second is concerned with positive feelings such as happiness and contentment. How well–being varies by age and socio–economic standing is briefly summarized, followed by examination of its biological correlates (neuroendocrine, immune, cardiovascular, rapid eye movement (REM) sleep). Preliminary findings on a sample of ageing women showed that those with higher levels of eudaimonic well–being had lower levels of daily salivary cortisol, pro–inflammatory cytokines, cardiovascular risk, and longer duration REM sleep compared with those showing lower levels of eudaimonic well–being. Hedonic well–being, however, showed minimal linkage to biomarker assessments. Future research directions building on these initial findings are discussed.

3 January 2018 in Lipids in Health and Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BRBarry T. Radler
Barry T. Radler
ARAttilio Rigotti
Attilio Rigotti
Carol D. RyffCarol D. Ryff
Carol D. Ryff
Psychological correlates of blood lipid levels have been previously evaluated mostly in cross sectional studies. However, prospectively measured psychological factors might also predict favorable blood lipid profiles, thereby indicating a healthy mind/body interplay that is associated with less disease, better health and longer lives. This paper examined whether longitudinal profiles of psychological well-being over 9–10 years are predictors of blood lipid profiles. Using the MIDUS (Midlife in the U.S.) biological subsample (n = 1054, aged 34 to 84, 55% female), cross-time trajectories of well-being were linked with three lipid outcomes (i.e., HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL cholesterol), measured for the first time at the 2nd wave of the study. Most adults showed largely stable profiles of well-being, albeit at different levels. Some showed persistently high well-being over time, while others revealed persistently low or moderate well-being. After adjusting for the effect of demographics, health behaviors, medications, and insulin resistance, adults with persistently high levels of environmental mastery and self-acceptance—two components of psychological well-being—had significantly higher levels of HDL as well as significantly lower levels of triglycerides compared to adults with persistently low levels of well-being. Converging with prior findings, no association was found between well-being and LDL cholesterol. Over 9–10 years, persistently high levels of psychological well-being measures predicted high HDL cholesterol and low triglycerides. These findings add longitudinal evidence to the growing body of research showing that positive psychological factors are linked with better lipoprotein profiles. A better blood lipid profile, particularly higher HDL-C, may be key in mediating how psychological well-being positively impacts health and length of life. Additional research is required to further validate this hypothesis as well as to establish potential underlying mechanisms.

1 November 2003 in Psychological Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DJDaren C. Jackson
Daren C. Jackson
CMCorrina J. Mueller
Corrina J. Mueller
IDIsa Dolski
Isa Dolski
KDKim M. Dalton
Kim M. Dalton
JNJack B. Nitschke
Jack B. Nitschke
RDRichard J. Davidson
Richard J. Davidson

14 May 2021
Verified
Book Chapter
Open access
PDF file
Carol D. RyffCarol D. Ryff
Carol D. Ryff
JBJennifer Morozink Boylan
Jennifer Morozink Boylan
JKJulie A. Kirsch
Julie A. Kirsch
This chapter provides an overview of hedonic and eudaimonic approaches to well-being, both with roots traceable to the ancient Greeks. The authors examine the history of each approach and describe scientific endeavors seeking to translate the ideas to empirical assessment tools. They review how these two varieties of well-being are distributed in the general population by attending to their associations with major demographic factors (age, socioeconomic status, gender, race) as well as the interplay (intersectionality) of such factors. Such information contextualizes what is known about who reports they are or are not experiencing various aspects of well-being. The authors then examine how hedonic and eudaimonic well-being are linked with multiple indicators of health (self-reported, morbidity, mortality, biological systems). There is a paucity of studies that have jointly examined both types of well-being. The authors then draw attention to changing historical conditions and what this means for the future study of well-being and health.