John A. Rupp

Prof. John A. Rupp


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 October 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
John GrahamJohn Graham
John Graham
JRJohn A. Rupp
John A. Rupp
EBEva Brungard
Eva Brungard
Considering the quest to meet both sustainable development and energy security goals, we explore the ramifications of explosive growth in the global demand for lithium to meet the needs for batteries in plug-in electric vehicles and grid-scale energy storage. We find that heavy dependence on lithium will create energy security risks because China has a dominant position in the lithium supply chain and both Europe and North America seek to curtail reliance on China throughout their supply chains. We also find that efforts to expand lithium mining have been much less successful in Chile, the United States, and Europe than in Australia. Local communities resist licensing of new lithium mines due to a variety of environmental, social, and economic concerns. There are alternative technologies that may make lithium mining more sustainable such as direct lithium extraction, but the timing of commercialization of this process is uncertain. Progress is also being made in battery recycling and in alternative battery designs that do not use lithium. Such advances are unlikely to attenuate the global rate of growth in lithium demand prior to 2030. We conclude that tradeoffs between sustainability and energy security are real, especially in the next decade.

2 November 2016 in Journal of Applied Crystallography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJitendra Bahadur
Jitendra Bahadur
CMCristian R. Medina
Cristian R. Medina
LHLilin He
Lilin He
YMYuri B. Melnichenko
Yuri B. Melnichenko
JRJohn A. Rupp
John A. Rupp
DMDavid F. R. Mildner
David F. R. Mildner

1 March 2017 in Environmental Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CMCristian R. Medina
Cristian R. Medina
MMMaria Mastalerz
Maria Mastalerz
JRJohn A. Rupp
John A. Rupp
The successful implementation of geologic carbon sequestration depends on the careful evaluation of the petrophysical characteristics of the storage reservoir. Two petrophysical properties, porosity and permeability, constrain the reservoir in terms of its storage potential and injectivity. These two key parameters may vary significantly in scale within a reservoir. Likewise, the analytical tools that are useful for measuring these properties also vary and only assess pores of a given scale. In this investigation, 52 rock samples that consist of carbonates having a high degree of dolomitization were obtained from the Cambrian–Ordovician Knox Supergroup from different depth intervals; these samples span a significant area of the Midwestern United States. The samples were analyzed for total porosity and pore-size distribution using a variety of techniques, including petrographic image analysis, helium porosimetry, gas adsorption, mercury porosimetry, and ultrasmall-angle/small-angle neutron scattering. Capillary entrapment, or “residual saturation,” is that part of the injected CO2 that remains trapped in micropores after the pressure elevated by the injection process returns to ambient reservoir pressure. Results from low-pressure nitrogen and carbon dioxide adsorption and from mercury injection capillary pressure are important in that they provide insights about small pore size that otherwise cannot be resolved by standard helium porosimetry or by image analysis software. Results from these analyses suggest that micro- and mesoporosity control capillary entrapment, whereas macroporosity controls permeability.

1 September 2017 in Environmental Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RLR. W. Lahann
R. W. Lahann
JRJohn A. Rupp
John A. Rupp
CMC. R. Medina
C. R. Medina
GCG. Carlson
G. Carlson
KJK. M. Johnson
K. M. Johnson
The stress regime in the Illinois Basin was investigated to assess how the rock column might respond to the injection of fluids, including coproduced formation brines and supercritical CO2.This response is a concern because injection practices could increase pore fluid pressure and potentially induce seismicity. Data were collected to determine the magnitude and orientation of a three-component stress field: vertical stress (Sv) and minimum (Sh) and maximum (SH) horizontal stresses. The Sv was evaluated with a six-layer lithostratigraphic column. A two-layer pressure–depth Sv model was generated for the central part of the basin, and a single pressure gradient model was constructed for the surrounding region. In the central part of the basin, the Sv gradient is 24.9 MPa/km (1.11 psi/ft) to a depth of 2134 m (7000 ft), followed by a gradient of 27.1 MPa/km (1.20 psi/ft) below 2134 m (7000 ft). For the area surrounding the deep basin, the Sv gradient was 25.5 MPa/km (1.13 psi/ft). The Sh was evaluated from multiple data sources, primarily hydraulic fracture records or extended leak-off tests. The Sh gradient calculations ranged from 24.1 to 27.3 MPa/km (1.07 to 1.21 psi/ft). The Sh values for the basal Paleozoic clastic units are lower than those for units in the overlying horizons. The SH was based on a critically stressed model yielding values between 40.0 and 82.6 MPa/km (1.77 to 3.65 psi/ft). Stress orientation data for the Illinois Basin were collected from multiple sources. The orientation of SH across the study area is relatively uniform in strike at approximately N60°E. Marked deviations in SH result from localized structural discontinuities.

1 September 2012 in Environmental Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RNRyan J. Neufelder
Ryan J. Neufelder
BBBrenda B. Bowen
Brenda B. Bowen
RLRichard W. Lahann
Richard W. Lahann
JRJohn A. Rupp
John A. Rupp
Concerns about potential climate change related to greenhouse gas emissions have spurred researchers across the world to assess the viability of geologic storage of CO2. In the Illinois Basin in the United States, the Cambrian Mount Simon Sandstone has been targeted as a reservoir for carbon capture and storage (CCS). In this CCS system, the Eau Claire Formation is expected to serve as the primary seal to prevent upward migration of the CO2 plume; however, little work has been done to specifically determine how well it will function as a seal. Although the lateral extent and thickness of the Eau Claire Formation, along with its generally low permeability, certainly make it a prime candidate to serve in this capacity, the primary depositional fabric and mineralogy, which are the fundamental controls on the petrophysical charter of this unit, remain poorly constrained. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the lithologic, mineralogical, and petrophysical properties of the Eau Claire Formation in an effort to characterize its potential as a functional seal in a CCS system. Sixty-six core-derived Eau Claire Formation samples from seven wells within the Illinois Basin are described using a combination of petrography, reflectance spectroscopy, x-ray diffraction, geochemical, and petrophysical analyses. These analyses show that the Eau Claire Formation contains five different lithofacies (sandstone, clean siltstone, muddy siltstone, silty mudstone, and shale) with fine-scale heterogeneities in fabric and mineralogy that greatly influence the petrophysical properties. Porosity, permeability, and entry-pressure data suggest that some, but not all, lithofacies within the Eau Claire Formation have the capability to serve as a suitable CCS seal. Abundant authigenic minerals and dissolution textures indicate that multiple generations of past fluid-rock interactions have occurred within the Eau Claire Formation, demonstrating that much of the formation has behaved as a fluid conduit instead of as a seal. Minerals that would be potentially reactive in a CCS system (including carbonate, glauconite, and chlorite) are common in the Eau Claire Formation. Dissolution of these and other phases in the presence of carbonic acid could potentially jeopardize the sealing integrity of the unit. Although complexities in the sealing properties exist, the dynamics of the CCS system and the potential for precipitation of new minerals should allow the Eau Claire Formation to serve as an adequate seal.

1 September 2014 in Environmental Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RLRichard Lahann
Richard Lahann
JRJohn A. Rupp
John A. Rupp
CMCristian Medina
Cristian Medina
The Eau Claire Formation of the midwestern United States was evaluated for its potential use as a confining unit (seal) overlying a sandstone reservoir to securely store injected CO2. This evaluation included: (1) lithofacies composition and distribution, (2) capillary entry pressure analysis, and (3) fluid- and fracture-pressure analysis. The regional distribution of lithofacies in the Eau Claire was evaluated by examination of core and log data from selected wells across the study area. Log data were used to define electro-lithofacies, which are spatially variable and represent a mixture of shale, siltstone, sandstone, limestone, and dolomite. Because of the significant variation in lithofacies and the complex spatial distribution, the entire interval should be considered in evaluating the seal capacity of the unit at a given locality. Mercury-injection capillary pressure (MICP) data were obtained on 17 samples of Eau Claire lithofacies ranging from muddy shale to sand/silt to evaluate the potential for capillary entry of fluids into the pore system of the lithofacies of the unit. Interpretation of these data indicated capillary failure of the muddy shale lithofacies is unlikely. However, many of the MICP samples contain millimeter-scale silt/sand interbeds, which would probably allow CO2 entry but, because these beds commonly have very limited lateral continuity, they are very unlikely to provide pathways for large-scale CO2 leakage through the interval. Evaluation of structural settings, lithostatic and existing formation aquifer pressures in the Eau Claire, in conjunction with the height of CO2 columns stored in the underlying Mount Simon Sandstone (Cambrian), suggest that fluid pressures induced by a static buoyant CO2 plume are unlikely to induce fractures in the formation. However, elevation of the aquifer pressure during injection may be capable of creating fractures within the unit.