Susannah G Tringe

Dr. Susannah G Tringe

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 August 2020 in Nature Reviews Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Pankaj TrivediPankaj Trivedi
Pankaj Trivedi
JLJan E. Leach
Jan E. Leach
STSusannah G Tringe
Susannah G Tringe
Tongmin SaTongmin Sa
Tongmin Sa
BSBrajesh K. Singh
Brajesh K. Singh

1 August 2012 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DLDerek S. Lundberg
Derek S. Lundberg
SLSarah L. Lebeis
Sarah L. Lebeis
SPSur Herrera Paredes
Sur Herrera Paredes
SYScott Yourstone
Scott Yourstone
JGJase Gehring
Jase Gehring
JDJeffery L. Dangl
Jeffery L. Dangl

1 August 2017 in Nature Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RBRobert M Bowers
Robert M Bowers
NKNikos C Kyrpides
Nikos C Kyrpides
RSRamunas Stepanauskas
Ramunas Stepanauskas
MHMiranda Harmon-Smith
Miranda Harmon-Smith
DDDevin Doud
Devin Doud
TWTanja Woyke
Tanja Woyke
We present two standards developed by the Genomic Standards Consortium (GSC) for reporting bacterial and archaeal genome sequences. Both are extensions of the Minimum Information about Any (x) Sequence (MIxS). The standards are the Minimum Information about a Single Amplified Genome (MISAG) and the Minimum Information about a Metagenome-Assembled Genome (MIMAG), including, but not limited to, assembly quality, and estimates of genome completeness and contamination. These standards can be used in combination with other GSC checklists, including the Minimum Information about a Genome Sequence (MIGS), Minimum Information about a Metagenomic Sequence (MIMS), and Minimum Information about a Marker Gene Sequence (MIMARKS). Community-wide adoption of MISAG and MIMAG will facilitate more robust comparative genomic analyses of bacterial and archaeal diversity.

16 April 2013 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJason A. Peiffer
Jason A. Peiffer
ASAymé Spor
Aymé Spor
OKOmry Koren
Omry Koren
ZJZhao Jin
Zhao Jin
STSusannah G Tringe
Susannah G Tringe
RLRuth E. Ley
Ruth E. Ley
The rhizosphere is a critical interface supporting the exchange of resources between plants and their associated soil environment. Rhizosphere microbial diversity is influenced by the physical and chemical properties of the rhizosphere, some of which are determined by the genetics of the host plant. However, within a plant species, the impact of genetic variation on the composition of the microbiota is poorly understood. Here, we characterized the rhizosphere bacterial diversity of 27 modern maize inbreds possessing exceptional genetic diversity grown under field conditions. Randomized and replicated plots of the inbreds were planted in five field environments in three states, each with unique soils and management conditions. Using pyrosequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA genes, we observed substantial variation in bacterial richness, diversity, and relative abundances of taxa between bulk soil and the maize rhizosphere, as well as between fields. The rhizospheres from maize inbreds exhibited both a small but significant proportion of heritable variation in total bacterial diversity across fields, and substantially more heritable variation between replicates of the inbreds within each field. The results of this study should facilitate expanded studies to identify robust heritable plant–microbe interactions at the level of individual polymorphisms by genome wide association, so that plant-microbiome interactions can ultimately be incorporated into plant breeding.

28 May 2018 in Nature Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSChristian M. K. Sieber
Christian M. K. Sieber
APAlexander J. Probst
Alexander J. Probst
ASAllison Sharrar
Allison Sharrar
BTBrian C. Thomas
Brian C. Thomas
MHMatthias Hess
Matthias Hess
JBJillian F. Banfield
Jillian F. Banfield
Microbial communities are critical to ecosystem function. A key objective of metagenomic studies is to analyse organism-specific metabolic pathways and reconstruct community interaction networks. This requires accurate assignment of assembled genome fragments to genomes. Existing binning methods often fail to reconstruct a reasonable number of genomes and report many bins of low quality and completeness. Furthermore, the performance of existing algorithms varies between samples and biotopes. Here, we present a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy, DAS Tool, that combines the strengths of a flexible set of established binning algorithms. DAS Tool applied to a constructed community generated more accurate bins than any automated method. Indeed, when applied to environmental and host-associated samples of different complexity, DAS Tool recovered substantially more near-complete genomes, including previously unreported lineages, than any single binning method alone. The ability to reconstruct many near-complete genomes from metagenomics data will greatly advance genome-centric analyses of ecosystems.

22 April 2005 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
STSusannah G Tringe
Susannah G Tringe
CMChristian von Mering
Christian von Mering
AKArthur Kobayashi
Arthur Kobayashi
ASAsaf A. Salamov
Asaf A. Salamov
KCKevin Chen
Kevin Chen
EREdward M. Rubin
Edward M. Rubin
The species complexity of microbial communities and challenges in culturing representative isolates make it difficult to obtain assembled genomes. Here we characterize and compare the metabolic capabilities of terrestrial and marine microbial communities using largely unassembled sequence data obtained by shotgun sequencing DNA isolated from the various environments. Quantitative gene content analysis reveals habitat-specific fingerprints that reflect known characteristics of the sampled environments. The identification of environment-specific genes through a gene-centric comparative analysis presents new opportunities for interpreting and diagnosing environments.