Luisa Paolotti

Dr. Luisa Paolotti

Dept. of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, 06121 Perugia, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2012 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Cesare CastelliniCesare Castellini
Cesare Castellini
Antonio BoggiaAntonio Boggia
Antonio Boggia
CCCarla Cortina
Carla Cortina
ABAlessandro Dal Bosco
Alessandro Dal Bosco
Luisa PaolottiLuisa Paolotti
Luisa Paolotti
Cecilia MugnaiCecilia Mugnai
Cecilia Mugnai

1 February 2018 in Land Use Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Antonio BoggiaAntonio Boggia
Antonio Boggia
GMGianluca Massei
Gianluca Massei
EPElaine Pace
Elaine Pace
LRLucia Rocchi
Lucia Rocchi
Luisa PaolottiLuisa Paolotti
Luisa Paolotti
Maria AttardMaria Attard
Maria Attard

1 September 2016 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Luisa PaolottiLuisa Paolotti
Luisa Paolotti
Antonio BoggiaAntonio Boggia
Antonio Boggia
Cesare CastelliniCesare Castellini
Cesare Castellini
LRLucia Rocchi
Lucia Rocchi
ARAdolfo Rosati
Adolfo Rosati

1 January 2018 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Antonio BoggiaAntonio Boggia
Antonio Boggia
GMGianluca Massei
Gianluca Massei
Luisa PaolottiLuisa Paolotti
Luisa Paolotti
LRLucia Rocchi
Lucia Rocchi
FSFederico Schiavi
Federico Schiavi

31 January 2022 in Social Indicators Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ERE. Ricciolini
E. Ricciolini
LRLucia Rocchi
Lucia Rocchi
MCM. Cardinali
M. Cardinali
Luisa PaolottiLuisa Paolotti
Luisa Paolotti
FRF. Ruiz
F. Ruiz
Antonio BoggiaAntonio Boggia
Antonio Boggia
To achieve the UN 2030 Agenda Goals, and considering their complexity and multidisciplinary, Multi-criteria analysis appears to be a suitable approach to give a true support to public decision makers in defining policy lines. This study focuses on the application of the Multiple Reference Point Weak-Strong Composite Indicators (MRP-WSCI) and its partially compensatory version (MRP-PCI), to assess, in the framework of the UN 2030 Agenda, the sustainability of the 28 members of the European Union (pre-Brexit). Countries were analyzed and compared according to their conditions and progress against the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, considering three reference years: 2007, 2012 and 2017. The analysis shows that Nordic countries reach a good level of global sustainability, with values of the indicators, W-W-W and S-W-W, between 2 and 3; while the States of east Europe, in particular Romania, Bulgaria and Greece, stay at the worst levels, having overall indicators values less than 1.5. Furthermore, the results highlight how countries in the lower group have difficulties especially in social and economic sustainability. On the other hand, states with a good overall condition record the worst results in the environmental dimension, such as the Netherlands, which shows, for the year 2017, a value for this sphere less than 2, while in the other two show a good value (over 2.5).

1 November 2014 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Antonio BoggiaAntonio Boggia
Antonio Boggia
LRLucia Rocchi
Lucia Rocchi
Luisa PaolottiLuisa Paolotti
Luisa Paolotti
FMFrancesco Musotti
Francesco Musotti
SGSalvatore Greco
Salvatore Greco
Rural Development is a priority in Europe and it is supported by specific, financial programmes. At the same time, sustainability is the key word for the European Union to construct programmes and policies for all human activities. However, measuring sustainability of rural areas is not easy, due to their particular features. The improvement of knowledge on sustainability in rural areas is important to build long term policies and strategies for those territories. The objective of this study is the development of a decision support system based on the Dominance-based Rough Set Approach (DRSA), to assess the level of Rural Sustainable Development in specific areas. We used DRSA to analyze the level of sustainability of the 92 municipalities of the Region of Umbria, Italy. The results were synthesized in a final ranking, taking into account the equilibrium and the integration between development and sustainability of each municipality. DRSA showed a high potential in the context of management or planning, and for supporting Decision Makers. DRSA is able to give a ranking as well as an explanation of the main factors driving sustainable development in rural areas.