Julie A. Bradley

Dr. Julie A. Bradley

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2016 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJulie A. Bradley
Julie A. Bradley
RDRoi Dagan
Roi Dagan
MHMeng Wei Ho
Meng Wei Ho
MRMichael Rutenberg
Michael Rutenberg
CMChristopher G. Morris
Christopher G. Morris
NMNancy P. Mendenhall
Nancy P. Mendenhall

29 January 2018 in Annual Review of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJulie A. Bradley
Julie A. Bradley
NMNancy P. Mendenhall
Nancy P. Mendenhall
During the early decades of radiation therapy for breast cancer, local control of disease was documented consistently but, enigmatically, an anticipated impact on breast cancer survival was not observed, leading to confusion in our understanding of the natural history of breast cancer and radiation effects. Now, almost 90 years after its first use in breast cancer, technology developments in diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy have elucidated parts of this enigma. The data now available demonstrate a significant impact of radiation therapy on survival as well as disease control and treatment-related mortality, opening a doorway to understanding the powerful impact of radiation therapy on both breast cancer and critical organs. Efforts are focused on leveraging novel techniques to maximize the benefits of radiation for breast cancer patients.

1 August 2020 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HUHaruka Uezono
Haruka Uezono
DIDaniel J. Indelicato
Daniel J. Indelicato
RRRonny L. Rotondo
Ronny L. Rotondo
RVRaymond B. Mailhot Vega
Raymond B. Mailhot Vega
SBScott M. Bradfield
Scott M. Bradfield
JBJulie A. Bradley
Julie A. Bradley

1 January 2019 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJulie A. Bradley
Julie A. Bradley
MKMark L. Kayton
Mark L. Kayton
YCYueh-Yun Chi
Yueh-Yun Chi
DHDouglas S. Hawkins
Douglas S. Hawkins
JTJing Tian
Jing Tian
SDSarah S. Donaldson
Sarah S. Donaldson

19 April 2018 in Radiation Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XLXiaoying Liang
Xiaoying Liang
JBJulie A. Bradley
Julie A. Bradley
DZDandan Zheng
Dandan Zheng
MRMichael S. Rutenberg
Michael S. Rutenberg
DYDaniel Yeung
Daniel Yeung
ZLZuofeng Li
Zuofeng Li
To identify prognostic factors for grade 3 radiation dermatitis following passive-scattering proton therapy for breast cancer. This retrospective study included data on 23 (11 post-mastectomy and 12 post-lumpectomy) breast cancer patients who underwent proton therapy with the passive scattering technique in our institute from 2012 to 2016. Each patient received 50–50.4 cobalt Gy equivalent (CGE) at 1.8 or 2 CGE per daily fraction. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors for grade 3 skin toxicity. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. 43% of the studied patients developed grade 3 radiation dermatitis. The dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters of V52.5CGE and D10cm3 to skin5mm were correlated with grade 3 radiation dermatitis in both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Univariate logistic regression analysis suggested that D10cm3 to skin5mm (AUC = 0.69) and V52.5CGE to skin5mm (AUC = 0.70) were prognostic for grade 3 skin toxicity. The models using the combination of D10cm3 to skin5mm or V52.5CGE to skin5mm with breast volume marginally increased the AUC to 0.72 and 0.73, respectively. Models using the combination of D10cm3 to skin5mm or V52.5CGE to skin5mm with history of smoking increased the AUC to 0.75 and 0.83, respectively. In the current study, we identified prognostic factors for grade 3 radiation dermatitis in patients treated with passive-scattering proton therapy for breast cancer. This study provides promising tool for identifying high risk patients for whom treatment plan adjustment could be done to reduce the risk of radiation-induced grade 3 skin toxicity.

3 June 2023 in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FGFantine Giap
Fantine Giap
SMSung Jun Ma
Sung Jun Ma
OOOluwadamilola T. Oladeru
Oluwadamilola T. Oladeru
YHYoung-Rock Hong
Young-Rock Hong
BYBrian Yu
Brian Yu
JBJulie A. Bradley
Julie A. Bradley