Michael S. Rutenberg

Dr. Michael S. Rutenberg


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 April 2018 in Radiation Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XLXiaoying Liang
Xiaoying Liang
JBJulie A. Bradley
Julie A. Bradley
DZDandan Zheng
Dandan Zheng
MRMichael S. Rutenberg
Michael S. Rutenberg
DYDaniel Yeung
Daniel Yeung
ZLZuofeng Li
Zuofeng Li
To identify prognostic factors for grade 3 radiation dermatitis following passive-scattering proton therapy for breast cancer. This retrospective study included data on 23 (11 post-mastectomy and 12 post-lumpectomy) breast cancer patients who underwent proton therapy with the passive scattering technique in our institute from 2012 to 2016. Each patient received 50–50.4 cobalt Gy equivalent (CGE) at 1.8 or 2 CGE per daily fraction. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors for grade 3 skin toxicity. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. 43% of the studied patients developed grade 3 radiation dermatitis. The dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters of V52.5CGE and D10cm3 to skin5mm were correlated with grade 3 radiation dermatitis in both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Univariate logistic regression analysis suggested that D10cm3 to skin5mm (AUC = 0.69) and V52.5CGE to skin5mm (AUC = 0.70) were prognostic for grade 3 skin toxicity. The models using the combination of D10cm3 to skin5mm or V52.5CGE to skin5mm with breast volume marginally increased the AUC to 0.72 and 0.73, respectively. Models using the combination of D10cm3 to skin5mm or V52.5CGE to skin5mm with history of smoking increased the AUC to 0.75 and 0.83, respectively. In the current study, we identified prognostic factors for grade 3 radiation dermatitis in patients treated with passive-scattering proton therapy for breast cancer. This study provides promising tool for identifying high risk patients for whom treatment plan adjustment could be done to reduce the risk of radiation-induced grade 3 skin toxicity.

1 February 2020 in Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMichael S. Rutenberg
Michael S. Rutenberg
RNRomaine C. Nichols
Romaine C. Nichols
Pancreatic carcinoma is a challenging malignancy to manage with a very poor prognosis. Despite continued difficulties in its management, there have been incremental improvements in outcomes over the past several decades. Achieving the best oncologic outcomes requires a multimodality approach including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Proton radiotherapy enables the delivery of high-dose radiotherapy to the tumor or resection bed while sparing nearby critical organs. Due to their unique physical properties, protons can deliver radiotherapy dose distributions that are not achievable with photons (X-rays) even with advanced photon delivery techniques (e.g., intensity-modulated radiotherapy). Improved dose distributions can lead to reduced treatment toxicity and enable treatment intensification. As better chemotherapy regimens lead to better systemic disease control, it will become increasingly important that local-regional control is achieved. This will in part be accomplished by combining better radiotherapy with more active chemotherapies. Proton radiotherapy provides an excellent means for achieving this.

21 February 2020 in Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MRMichael S. Rutenberg
Michael S. Rutenberg
RRRonny L. Rotondo
Ronny L. Rotondo
DRDinesh Rao
Dinesh Rao
AHAdam L. Holtzman
Adam L. Holtzman
DIDaniel J. Indelicato
Daniel J. Indelicato
WMWilliam M. Mendenhall
William M. Mendenhall

1 March 2021 in Current Treatment Options in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WLWen Shen Looi
Wen Shen Looi
DIDaniel J. Indelicato
Daniel J. Indelicato
MRMichael S. Rutenberg
Michael S. Rutenberg

12 March 2022 in Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MRMichael S. Rutenberg
Michael S. Rutenberg
AHAdam L. Holtzman
Adam L. Holtzman
DIDaniel J. Indelicato
Daniel J. Indelicato
SHSoon Huh
Soon Huh
DRDinesh Rao
Dinesh Rao
RARobert J. Amdur
Robert J. Amdur

1 July 2018 in International Journal of Particle Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SZSimeng Zhu
Simeng Zhu
RRRonny Rotondo
Ronny Rotondo
WMWilliam M. Mendenhall
William M. Mendenhall
RDRoi Dagan
Roi Dagan
DLDebbie Lewis
Debbie Lewis
MRMichael S. Rutenberg
Michael S. Rutenberg
Purpose: Evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) treated with fractionated proton therapy (PT) at a single institution. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients treated with fractionated PT for definitive management of VS between November 2007 and December 2013 at our institution. No patient had received prior treatment for VS. Patients received 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions using passively scattered PT. Pretreatment and posttreatment hearing status, tumor dimensions, and cranial nerve V and VII function were evaluated. Hearing status was graded as nonserviceable or serviceable, defined as Gardner-Robertson grade I or II and the ability to use a telephone with the treated ear. Toxicities were prospectively evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Results: Fourteen patients with 14 lesions (8 men, 6 women) were included in the analysis. Median age at treatment was 60 years (range, 24–74 years). M...