Andrew Hooper

Andrew Hooper


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 December 2004 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AHAndrew Hooper
Andrew Hooper
HZHoward Zebker
Howard Zebker
PSPaul Segall
Paul Segall
BKBert Kampes
Bert Kampes

19 August 2008 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AHAndrew Hooper
Andrew Hooper

10 July 2007 in Journal of Geophysical Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AHAndrew Hooper
Andrew Hooper
PSP. Segall
P. Segall
HZH. Zebker
H. Zebker

1 January 2012 in Tectonophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHAndrew Hooper
Andrew Hooper
DBDavid Bekaert
David Bekaert
KSKarsten Spaans
Karsten Spaans
MAMahmut Arıkan
Mahmut Arıkan

15 December 2014 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FSFreysteinn Sigmundsson
Freysteinn Sigmundsson
AHAndrew Hooper
Andrew Hooper
SHSigrún Hreinsdóttir
Sigrún Hreinsdóttir
KVKristín S. Vogfjörd
Kristín S. Vogfjörd
BÓBenedikt G. Ófeigsson
Benedikt G. Ófeigsson
EEEva P. S. Eibl
Eva P. S. Eibl
Crust at many divergent plate boundaries forms primarily by the injection of vertical sheet-like dykes, some tens of kilometres long. Previous models of rifting events indicate either lateral dyke growth away from a feeding source, with propagation rates decreasing as the dyke lengthens, or magma flowing vertically into dykes from an underlying source, with the role of topography on the evolution of lateral dykes not clear. Here we show how a recent segmented dyke intrusion in the Bárðarbunga volcanic system grew laterally for more than 45 kilometres at a variable rate, with topography influencing the direction of propagation. Barriers at the ends of each segment were overcome by the build-up of pressure in the dyke end; then a new segment formed and dyke lengthening temporarily peaked. The dyke evolution, which occurred primarily over 14 days, was revealed by propagating seismicity, ground deformation mapped by Global Positioning System (GPS), interferometric analysis of satellite radar images (InSAR), and graben formation. The strike of the dyke segments varies from an initially radial direction away from the Bárðarbunga caldera, towards alignment with that expected from regional stress at the distal end. A model minimizing the combined strain and gravitational potential energy explains the propagation path. Dyke opening and seismicity focused at the most distal segment at any given time, and were simultaneous with magma source deflation and slow collapse at the Bárðarbunga caldera, accompanied by a series of magnitude M > 5 earthquakes. Dyke growth was slowed down by an effusive fissure eruption near the end of the dyke. Lateral dyke growth with segment barrier breaking by pressure build-up in the dyke distal end explains how focused upwelling of magma under central volcanoes is effectively redistributed over long distances to create new upper crust at divergent plate boundaries.

1 December 2015 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DBD.P.S. Bekaert
D.P.S. Bekaert
RWR.J. Walters
R.J. Walters
TWTim Wright
Tim Wright
AHAndrew Hooper
Andrew Hooper
DPD.J. Parker
D.J. Parker
Correcting for tropospheric delays is one of the largest challenges facing the interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) community. Spatial and temporal variations in temperature, pressure, and relative humidity create tropospheric signals in InSAR data, masking smaller surface displacements due to tectonic or volcanic deformation. Correction methods using weather model data, GNSS and/or spectrometer data have been applied in the past, but are often limited by the spatial and temporal resolution of the auxiliary data. Alternatively a correction can be estimated from the interferometric phase by assuming a linear or a power-law relationship between the phase and topography. Typically the challenge lies in separating deformation from tropospheric phase signals. In this study we performed a statistical comparison of the state-of-the-art tropospheric corrections estimated from the MERIS and MODIS spectrometers, a low and high spatial-resolution weather model (ERA-I and WRF), and both the conventional linear and new power-law empirical methods. Our test-regions include Southern Mexico, Italy, and El Hierro. We find spectrometers give the largest reduction in tropospheric signal, but are limited to cloud-free and daylight acquisitions. We find a ~10–20% RMSE increase with increasing cloud cover consistent across methods. None of the other tropospheric correction methods consistently reduced tropospheric signals over different regions and times. We have released a new software package called TRAIN (Toolbox for Reducing Atmospheric InSAR Noise), which includes all these state-of-the-art correction methods. We recommend future developments should aim towards combining the different correction methods in an optimal manner