Introduction: Nursing students are susceptible to healthcare-associated infections because of their direct patient interactions during their clinical training. Hence, compliance with standard precautions (SPs) is paramount during their clinical exposure and training. This study investigated the compliance with SPs and its predictors among Saudi nursing students from six universities. Methodology: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in six government universities in Saudi Arabia. A convenience sample of 829 Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) students was surveyed using the Compliance with Standard Precautions Scale. Descriptive and inferential statistics were carried out to analyze the data. Results: The overall compliance rate of the respondents was 60.1% with a mean score of 12.02 (SD = 4.50). The students reported highest compliance on covering the mouth and nose when wearing a mask, while the lowest compliance was on disposing sharps box before it is full. The university, academic year level, and attendance to infection prevention and control training or seminar in the last six months were identified as significant predictors of the students’ compliance with SPs. Conclusions: The findings provide valuable insights and guidance for improving the practice of SPs among future nurses, which could result in the reduction of infection exposure and its transmission rates among future nurses in clinical settings.

This study examined the levels of shared leadership and missed nursing care and their relationship among nurses in Egypt. A cross-sectional survey was conducted. From February to April 2024, 340 nurses worked in all inpatient care units at Alexandria Main University Hospital. The Shared Leadership and Missed Nursing Care Survey was used for evaluation. The overall score of shared leadership was (72.62 ± 4.30), which imitates a high perception of shared leadership among nurses; the dimension of delegation achieved the highest average mean score (3.66 ± 0.26), followed by collaboration (3.64 ± 0.31), the vision dimension scored the lowest mean score (3.59 ± 0.33). The elements of missed nursing care had a total score of (46.72 ± 5.69), and the dimension of secondary care achieved the highest average mean score (3.74 ± 0.31). The reasons for missed nursing care had a total mean score of (22.40 ± 1.59), and the dimension of labor resources achieved the highest average mean score (3.20 ± 0.22). Male nurses, less than 30 years old, married, held a bachelor’s degree in nursing sciences, less than five years of experience in the nursing profession, and less than five years of experience in the current working unit had higher total scores of the shared leadership and lower total scores of missed nursing care (P < 0.001). A negative correlation existed between shared leadership and two dimentisons (the elements of nursing care [r = −0.383], the reasons for missing nursing care [r = −0.047]) (P < 0.001). The study’s findings can help as a theoretical underpinning for nursing leaders to stand in an environment that reduces the incidence of missed nursing care by encouraging teamwork, responsibility, workload management, and empowerment among nurses.

Background: Medical errors are common, and in particular, medication errors are one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in healthcare. Nurses must disclose errors to build trust and ensure patient safety despite communication barriers and fear of reprisals. Truthful documentation and better collaboration can improve patient outcomes. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess barriers to error disclosure among nurses in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted in the months of June and August 2024 using a convenience sample of 255 nurses at King Fahad Hospital (KFH), Hofuf. A self-administered questionnaire that contained socio-demographic questions, as well as the Barriers to Error Disclosure Assessment (BEDA) tool, was deployed. Results: The majority of the sample were female (92.2%) and Bachelor’s degree holders (80.8%) who had 1–5 or 6–10 years of experience, representing 45.5% and 29.0% of the sample, respectively. When medical errors occur, only 18% of the nurses disclosed them to patients and their families, and 34.5% of the respondents disclosed medical errors to another team of healthcare professionals. The types of barriers to error disclosure were identified as relating to confidence and knowledge barriers, institutional barriers, psychological barriers, and financial concern barriers. The overall barrier score had an average of 63%. The barriers with the highest scores were those relating to psychological barriers (68.2%), followed by institutional barriers (66.5%) and financial concern barriers (64.5%). Conclusions: Targeted interventions are required for addressing the identified specific needs to support healthcare providers, specifically nurses. New regulations and policy changes are crucial for training programs implementation, enhancing safety culture, and tackling job-related insecurities to minimize barriers to error disclosure and ultimately provide better patient care quality. Further investigations may include a different approach, and it is recommended to provide deeper insights into nurse experiences.

Background: Literature suggests that merely omitting nursing care can put patients in danger and that avoiding these omissions potentially prevents deaths in hospitals. Objective: This study aimed to determine the perspective on the degree of missed nursing care among hospital nurses as it relates to their demographic profile. Method: A quantitative comparative research design was employed in this study. The study was conducted in the public hospitals in Hail City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The study participants were 317 staff nurses, chosen through a simple random sampling, from the public hospitals of Hail City. Data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire between February and June of 2019. Results: The overall mean of the participants’ reported scores was “never missed” at 4.62. Statistically significant results were found in terms of the number of children (0.001), years of experience (0.004), unit of assignment (0.001), and the level of satisfaction with the profession (0.001). All other variables such as gender, age, marital status, and shift were found insignificant, where all of the p-values were more than 0.05. Conclusion: Nurses who had more children, a greater lack of experience, were assigned to a complex unit, and were less satisfied in the profession were more likely to miss nursing care. As such, these errors can compromise the outcomes of nursing care in hospitals.

From the moment the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the coronavirus (COVID-19) a global pandemic, intensive care unit (ICU) nurses struggled to care for the COVID-19 patients. As the pandemic became increasingly critical, the task of daily care for critically ill patients fell upon the shoulders of ICU nurses. Understanding the lived experience of ICU nurses, as well as their perception of the experience, is important to identify key lessons to further improve ICU nurses’ psychological well-being and resilience. This study explored the lived experiences of ICU nurses who cared for COVID-19 patients using exploratory manifest qualitative content analysis. The findings of this study revealed that these ICU nurses offer important information concerning the crucial role of nurses’ family support and religious–spiritual practices in helping them to maintain well-being and cope with the intense situations caused by the pandemic. The lessons emerging from the study findings show that family support and religious–spiritual practices are resources for coping and resilience in times of future pandemics. This implies that ICU nurses who provide care during stressful emergency surges require relief by nurses working in other areas to provide them the opportunity to rest, reconnect with family and become emotionally re-energized.