Meteorological observations over the last four decades are of paramount importance to investigating ongoing climate change. An important issue is the quality and reliability of the climatic series, which are fundamental prerequisites to drawing the correct conclusions. Homogeneity tests are used to detect discontinuities whose interpretation is facilitated by metadata availability. In this work, daily minimum and maximum temperature measurements collected in Padua, Italy, between 1980 and 2022 are examined. During this period, the weather station of Padua center underwent many changes in location or instruments; therefore, some tests have been used to identify and remove their effects and obtain homogeneous series. Some well-known absolute tests have been applied to investigate the shift in the mean value: Standard Normal Homogeneity test (SNH), Buishand U and range tests, Pettitt test, F-test, and STARS. Relative tests have been applied too, using several stations nearby Padua and two reanalysis datasets (ERA5 and MERIDA) as reference series to enhance the picture of the local situation and provide more robust conclusions. The applied tests identify change-points in the years in which a change in instrument or the location of the station has occurred, confirming that these changes have compromised the homogeneity of the series. The sub-series obtained, splitting the observations in correspondence with these change-points, have been homogenized with respect to a selected period. The corrected series of the minimum and maximum temperatures are more coherent with the modern warming trend. The transfer functions to be applied to future measurements of minimum temperature have been calculated, while the series of maximum temperature measurements can be directly extended.

Climate-related geohazards, such as landslides, floods, and coastal erosion due to climate change, are increasingly impacting human settlements and activities. This study, part of the European Project RESPONSe (Interreg Italy–Croatia), investigates the perception of climate change as a catalyst of future geohazards among the citizens of the Veneto region (northeastern Italy). A total of 1233 questionnaires were completed by adult citizens and analyzed by means of inferential statistics. The results highlight a widespread perception of climate change as a general threat for the environment, but not directly transposed to the frequency and intensity of future geohazards. Certainly, changes in temperatures and rainfall are widely expected and acknowledged, yet the comprehension related to the hydrogeological effects seems to vary proportionally to the physical proximity to these hazards. Such outcomes underline that there is still a common lack of understanding of the eventual local impact of the climate crisis. For these reasons, it is suggested that decision makers consider directing their efforts to enhance the citizens’ knowledge base in order to build a climate-resilient society.

Meteorological observations over the last four decades are of paramount importance to investigate the ongoing climate change. The assessment of the reliability of any climatic time series is thus mandatory to draw correct conclusions. This evaluation involves homogeneity tests to detect artificial discontinuities whose identification is facilitated by metadata availability. In this work, daily minimum and maximum temperature measurements collected in Padua, Italy, between 1980 and 2022, are examined. Hourly observations began in 1993 and since the aim is to study long term behavior of the temperature, the focus is on daily averages and extremes. Over this period, the weather station of Padua center underwent many changes, in location or instrument; therefore, some tests have been used to identify and remove the effects of these variations and obtain a homogeneous time series. The homogeneity tests applied must be able to identify change-points both in the middle and at the extremes of the series. Some well-known absolute tests have been applied to investigate shift in the mean value: Standard Normal Homogeneity test (SNH), Buishand U and range tests, Pettitt test, F-test, STARS. Some relative tests have been applied too, which are generally more reliable than absolute tests, because they consider the information from neighboring stations. As relative tests rely on the homogeneity and quality of the reference series, several nearby stations and two reanalysis datasets (ERA5 and MERIDA) have been considered, to enhance the picture of the local situation and provide more robust conclusions. The applied tests identify change-points in the years in which a change in instrument or location of the station have occurred, confirming that these changes have compromised the homogeneity of the series. The sub-series obtained splitting the observations in correspondence of these change-points have been homogenized with respect a selected period; corrections must be applied also to future measurements to extend the time series properly.

The study of long precipitation series constitutes an important issue in climate research and risk assessment. However, long datasets are affected by inhomogeneities that can lead to biased results. A frequent but sometimes underestimated problem is the definition of the climatological day. The choice of different starting times may lead to inhomogeneity within the same station and misalignment with other stations. In this work, the problem of temporal misalignment between precipitation datasets characterized by different starting times of the observation day is analyzed. The most widely used adjustment methods (1 day and uniform shift) and two new methods based on reanalysis (NOAA and ERA5) are evaluated in terms of temporal alignment, precipitation statistics, and percentile distributions. As test series, the hourly precipitation series of Padua and nearby stations in the period of 1993–2022 are selected. The results show that the reanalysis-based methods, in particular ERA5, outperform the others in temporal alignment, regardless of the station. But, for the periods in which reanalysis data are not available, 1-day and uniform shift methods can be considered viable alternatives. On the other hand, the reanalysis-based methods are not always the best option in terms of precipitation statistics, as they increase the precipitation frequency and reduce the mean value over wet days, NOAA much more than ERA5. The use of the series of a station near the target one, which is mandatory in case of missing data, can sometimes give comparable or even better results than any adjustment method. For the Padua series, the analysis is repeated at monthly and seasonal resolutions. In the tested series, the adjustment methods do not provide good results in summer and autumn, the two seasons mainly affected by heavy rains in Padua. Finally, the percentile distribution indicates that any adjustment method underestimates the percentile values, except ERA5, and that only the nearby station most correlated with Padua gives results comparable to ERA5.

The aim of this work is to investigate drought variability in Padua, northern Italy, over a nearly 300-year period, from 1725 to 2023. Two well-established and widely used indices are calculated, the standardized precipitation index (SPI) and the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI). They are compatible with a data series starting in the early instrumental period, as both can be estimated using only temperature and precipitation data. The Padua daily precipitation and temperature series from the early 18th century, which were recovered and homogenized with current observations, are used as datasets. The standard approach to estimate SPI and SPEI based on gamma and log-logistic probability distribution functions, respectively, is questioned, assessing the fitting performance of different distributions applied to monthly precipitation data. The best-performing distributions are identified for each index and accumulation period at annual and monthly scales, and their normality is evaluated. In general, they detect more extreme drought events than the standard functions. Moreover, the main statistical values of SPI are very similar, regardless of the approach type, as opposed to SPEI. The difference between SPI and SPEI time series calculated with the best-fit approach has increased since the mid-20th century, in particular in spring and summer, and can be related to ongoing global warming, which SPEI takes into account. The innovative trend analysis applied to SPEI12 indicates a general increasing trend in droughts, while for SPI12, it is significant only for severe events. Summer and fall are the most affected seasons. The critical drought intensity–duration–frequency curves provide an easily understandable relationship between the intensity, duration and frequency of the most severe droughts and allow for the calculation of return periods for the critical events of a certain duration. Moreover, the longest and most severe droughts over the 1725–2023 period are identified.

Understanding long-term cloud cover variability is essential for assessing past climate dynamics and human influences on atmospheric conditions. In Padua, instrumental weather records (temperature, precipitation, pressure) and descriptive sky observations date back to 1725, but quantitative cloud cover data, expressed as tenths of the sky covered by clouds, began in 1872 at the Astronomical Observatory. From 1920 to 1989, observations continued under the authority of the Meteorological Observatory of the Water Magistrate, and from 1951 to 1990, additional records by the Italian Air Force expressed in eighths of sky are available. These visual datasets—based on multiple daily observations—are complemented by satellite records (from 1983) and reanalysis such as ERA5 (from 1940) and NOAA 20CRv3 (from 1872 to 2015). The aim of this study is to reconstruct a homogenized, long-term total cloud cover (TCC) time series for Padua from 1872 to 2024, integrating all available observational sources. By comparing overlapping periods across different subseries and nearby ground-based stations, the analysis not only investigates consistency and potential discontinuities across datasets but also quantifies the reliability and limitations of historical visual observations. This work provides one of the few centennial-scale reconstructions of cloud cover in Europe, offering a valuable contribution to historical climatology and climate change studies.