Arjan Kuijper

Prof. Arjan Kuijper

Fraunhofer IGD, TU Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2020 in Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKSalome Kazeminia
Salome Kazeminia
CBChristoph Baur
Christoph Baur
Arjan KuijperArjan Kuijper
Arjan Kuijper
BGBram van Ginneken
Bram van Ginneken
NNNassir Navab
Nassir Navab
AMAnirban Mukhopadhyay
Anirban Mukhopadhyay

21 April 2011 in Computer Graphics Forum
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TLT. von Landesberger
T. von Landesberger
Arjan KuijperArjan Kuijper
Arjan Kuijper
TSTobias Schreck
Tobias Schreck
JKJ. Kohlhammer
J. Kohlhammer
JWJ.J. van Wijk
J.J. van Wijk
DFD.W. Fellner
D.W. Fellner

12 July 2021 in IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BMBlaz Meden
Blaz Meden
PRPeter Rot
Peter Rot
PTPhilipp Terhorst
Philipp Terhorst
NDNaser Damer
Naser Damer
Arjan KuijperArjan Kuijper
Arjan Kuijper
Vitomir StrucVitomir Struc
Vitomir Struc
Biometric recognition technology has made significant advances over the last decade and is now used across a number of services and applications. However, this widespread deployment has also resulted in privacy concerns and evolving societal expectations about the appropriate use of the technology. For example, the ability to automatically extract age, gender, race, and health cues from biometric data has heightened concerns about privacy leakage. Face recognition technology, in particular, has been in the spotlight, and is now seen by many as posing a considerable risk to personal privacy. In response to these and similar concerns, researchers have intensified efforts towards developing techniques and computational models capable of ensuring privacy to individuals, while still facilitating the utility of face recognition technology in several application scenarios. These efforts have resulted in a multitude of privacy–enhancing techniques that aim at addressing privacy risks originating from biometric systems and providing technological solutions for legislative requirements set forth in privacy laws and regulations, such as GDPR. The goal of this overview paper is to provide a comprehensive introduction into privacy–related research in the area of biometrics and review existing work on Biometric Privacy–Enhancing Techniques (B–PETs) applied to face biometrics. To make this work useful for as wide of an audience as possible, several key topics are covered as well, including evaluation strategies used with B–PETs, existing datasets, relevant standards, and regulations and critical open issues that will have to be addressed in the future.

10 September 2021 in IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PTPhilipp Terhorst
Philipp Terhorst
JKJan Niklas Kolf
Jan Niklas Kolf
MHMarco Huber
Marco Huber
FKFlorian Kirchbuchner
Florian Kirchbuchner
NDNaser Damer
Naser Damer
Arjan KuijperArjan Kuijper
Arjan Kuijper
Face recognition (FR) systems have a growing effect on critical decision-making processes. Recent works have shown that FR solutions show strong performance differences based on the user’s demographics. However, to enable a trustworthy FR technology, it is essential to know the influence of an extended range of facial attributes on FR beyond demographics. Therefore, in this work, we analyze FR bias over a wide range of attributes. We investigate the influence of 47 attributes on the verification performance of two popular FR models. The experiments were performed on the publicly available MAAD-Face attribute database with over 120M high-quality attribute annotations. To prevent misleading statements about biased performances, we introduced control group-based validity values to decide if unbalanced test data causes the performance differences. The results demonstrate that also many nondemographic attributes strongly affect recognition performance, such as accessories, hairstyles and colors, face shapes, or facial anomalies. The observations of this work show the strong need for further advances in making the FR system more robust, explainable, and fair. Moreover, our findings might help to a better understanding of how FR networks work, enhance the robustness of these networks, and develop more generalized bias-mitigating FR solutions.

1 July 2018 in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDPeng Ding
Peng Ding
YZYe Zhang
Ye Zhang
WDWei-Jian Deng
Wei-Jian Deng
PJPing Jia
Ping Jia
Arjan KuijperArjan Kuijper
Arjan Kuijper

26 April 2022 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FBFadi Boutros
Fadi Boutros
PSPatrick Siebke
Patrick Siebke
MKMarcel Klemt
Marcel Klemt
NDNaser Damer
Naser Damer
FKFlorian Kirchbuchner
Florian Kirchbuchner
Arjan KuijperArjan Kuijper
Arjan Kuijper
Deep neural networks have rapidly become the mainstream method for face recognition (FR). However, this limits the deployment of such models that contain an extremely large number of parameters to embedded and low-end devices. In this work, we present an extremely lightweight and accurate FR solution, namely PocketNet. We utilize neural architecture search to develop a new family of lightweight face-specific architectures. We additionally propose a novel training paradigm based on knowledge distillation (KD), the multi-step KD, where the knowledge is distilled from the teacher model to the student model at different stages of the training maturity. We conduct a detailed ablation study proving both, the sanity of using NAS for the specific task of FR rather than general object classification, and the benefits of our proposed multi-step KD. We present an extensive experimental evaluation and comparisons with the state-of-the-art (SOTA) compact FR models on nine different benchmarks including large-scale evaluation benchmarks such as IJB-C and MegaFace. PocketNets have consistently advanced the SOTA FR performance on nine mainstream benchmarks when considering the same level of model compactness. With 0.92M parameters, our smallest network PocketNetS-128 achieved very competitive results to recent SOTA compacted models that contain up to 4M parameters. Training codes and pre-trained models are public. 1