Rodrigo A. Chorbadjian

Dr. Rodrigo A. Chorbadjian

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 May 2019 in The Plant Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CSChristian Silva-Sanzana
Christian Silva-Sanzana
JCJonathan Celiz-Balboa
Jonathan Celiz-Balboa
Elisa GarzoElisa Garzo
Elisa Garzo
SMSusan E. Marcus
Susan E. Marcus
JPJuan Pablo Parra-Rojas
Juan Pablo Parra-Rojas
FBFrancisca Blanco-Herrera
Francisca Blanco-Herrera
Because they suck phloem sap and act as vectors for phytopathogenic viruses, aphids pose a threat to crop yields worldwide. Pectic homogalacturonan (HG) has been described as a defensive element for plants during infections with phytopathogens. However, its role during aphid infestation remains unexplored. Using immunofluorescence assays and biochemical approaches, the HG methylesterification status and associated modifying enzymes during the early stage of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) infestation with the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) were analyzed. Additionally, the influence of pectin methylesterase (PME) activity on aphid settling and feeding behavior was evaluated by free choice assays and the Electrical Penetration Graph technique, respectively. Our results revealed that HG status and HG-modifying enzymes are significantly altered during the early stage of the plant-aphid interaction. Aphid infestation induced a significant increase in total PME activity and methanol emissions, concomitant with a decrease in the degree of HG methylesterification. Conversely, inhibition of PME activity led to a significant decrease in the settling and feeding preference of aphids. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the PME inhibitor AtPMEI13 has a defensive role during aphid infestation, since pmei13 mutants are significantly more susceptible to M. persicae in terms of settling preference, phloem access, and phloem sap drainage.

1 January 2019 in International Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NMNathaniel B. McCartney
Nathaniel B. McCartney
MAM. Isabel Ahumada
M. Isabel Ahumada
MMMarcela Muñoz
Marcela Muñoz
MRMarlene Rosales
Marlene Rosales
AFAngélica M. Fierro
Angélica M. Fierro
RCRodrigo A. Chorbadjian
Rodrigo A. Chorbadjian
Effects of saponin-rich quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) bran and bran extract in diets of adapted and non-adapted quinoa pests in laboratory bioassays

16 July 2018 in Agricultural and Forest Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RCRodrigo A. Chorbadjian
Rodrigo A. Chorbadjian
PPP. Larry Phelan
P. Larry Phelan
DHDaniel A. Herms
Daniel A. Herms

19 December 2021 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RCRodrigo A. Chorbadjian
Rodrigo A. Chorbadjian
MAMaría Isabel Ahumada
María Isabel Ahumada
FUFrancisco Urra
Francisco Urra
MEMario Elgueta
Mario Elgueta
Todd M. GilliganTodd M. Gilligan
Todd M. Gilligan
Identifying the particular guilds of herbivore arthropods that affect the production of crops is key to developing sustainable pest-management strategies; however, there is incomplete information about the identity of herbivore arthropods that could potentially damage the production of both highland and lowland quinoa landraces grown in Chile. By both reviewing the literature and conducting field collections across a large latitudinal gradient, we generated an updated list of 43 herbivore arthropods associated with quinoa production in Chile. In general, most species are polyphagous feeders, and only seven are specialists. The number and identity of species varied in relation with the latitude, such that four distinctive assemblages of herbivores were identified, each containing 32, 27, 34, and 22 species between latitudes 18–26, 26–32, 32–40, and 40–44° S, respectively. The most northern production area (18–26° S) is affected by nine unique species, including the major quinoa pest Eurysacca quinoae Povolný (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Similarly, the central area (32–40° S) contains four unique species, including Eurysacca media Povolný (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) and Orthotylus flavosparsus (Sahlberg) (Hemiptera: Miridae). The particular species assemblages described here will help further development of local pest-management practices.

1 December 2019 in Chilean journal of agricultural research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAM. Isabel Ahumada
M. Isabel Ahumada
RCRodrigo A. Chorbadjian
Rodrigo A. Chorbadjian
Cyantraniliprole has a broader insecticidal spectrum than the previously developed diamides. Because cyantraniliprole also targets hemipteran pests, it could provide an alternative to neonicotinoids like imidacloprid. However, there is limited information concerning how its broad-spectrum activity affects biological control agents. Toxicity of cyantraniliprole and imidacloprid to green peach aphid (Myzus persicae [Sulzer, 1776]), cabbage aphid (Brevicoryne brassicae [Linnaeus, 1758]) and greenhouse whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum [Westwood, 1856]) nymphs was determined using both systemic and direct spray exposure. In addition, the direct spray activity of cyantraniliprole and imidacloprid on larvae of green lacewing, Chrysoperla defreitasi Brooks, 1994, was studied. Estimated LC50 values indicated that M. persicae, B. brassicae and T. vaporariorum were more susceptible to the systemic exposure to cyantraniliprole than to direct spray (0.148 vs. 24.284, 0.004 vs. 11.004, and 0.268 vs. 30.832 mg L-1, respectively). Similarly, susceptibility of M. persicae, B. brassicae and T. vaporariorum to imidacloprid was more pronounced when exposed systemically than through direct contact (0.018 vs. 1.149, 0.006 vs. 0.514, and 0.249 vs. 6.419 mg L-1, respectively). Hence, the population of B. brassicae was 40-fold more susceptible to cyantraniliprole than M. persicae when exposed to its systemic activity, and 2.2-fold more susceptible to cyantraniliprole’s direct spray activity than M. persicae. Interestingly, T. vaporariorum was less susceptible to the direct spray activities of cyantraniliprole compared to that of imidacloprid by 4.8-fold, but both insecticides were equally toxic for this species after systemic exposure. Crysoperla larvae were less susceptible to direct exposure to cyantranaliprole in comparison with imidacloprid (640.295 vs. 26.974 mg L-1). In comparison to imidacloprid, direct spray insecticidal activity of cyantraniliprole was less toxic to these hemipteran pests and to chrysoperla larvae. This suggests that the selectivity of cyantraniliprole towards C. defreitasi, as measured by direct spray only, could decline if its concentration is increased to target these hemipteran pests by foliar sprays.

1 September 2011 in Plant Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Ana Luisa ValenciaAna Luisa Valencia
Ana Luisa Valencia
RCRodrigo A. Chorbadjian
Rodrigo A. Chorbadjian
BLB. A. Latorre
B. A. Latorre
The genus Nothofagus, family Nothofagaceae, comprises 36 species of trees that are native to the Southern Hemisphere. N. macrocarpa (DC.) F.M. Vásquez & R.A. Rodríguez (Roble de Santiago) is an important deciduous tree, endemic to central Chile (32 to 35°S), and found above 800 m altitude. There is an increasing interest in N. macrocarpa as an ornamental. However, a general dieback (40 to 50% prevalence) was observed at a commercial nursery in Santiago in 2009, limiting its multiplication. Symptoms are wilting, partial defoliation, reddish brown cankers on the crowns, and root necrosis. The purpose of this work was to study the etiology of the dieback in nurseries. Phytophthora was isolated from the roots and cankers of symptomatic plants (n = 3) and soil samples (using apples and avocados as baits) on amended corn meal agar (3) at 20°C for 5 days in the dark. Morphologically, P. citrophthora (Smith & Smith) Leonian, and P. nicotianae Breda de Haan were identified (2). On V8 juice agar (V8) (1), P. citrophthora formed petaloid colonies, grew between 5 and 30°C (optimum of 25°C), and produced deciduous, mono- or bipapillated sporangia of (28.1) 45.0 to 64.1 × (18.8) 32.0 to 39.2 μm. On V8, P. nicotianae produced cottony colonies, grew between 10 and 30°C (optimum of 25°C), and produced spherical, intercalary chlamydospores (mean diameter of 19.6 μm) and persistent, papillate, spherical to ovoid, ellipsoid, obpyriform sporangia of (33.2) 47.5 to 67.6 × (24.1) 30.0 to 48.9 μm. Isolates of P. citrophthora were sexually sterile, but P. nicotianae formed oogonia with amphigenous antheridia in dual cultures with P. cinnamomi (A2 compatibility type). BLAST analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of rDNA of isolates identified as P. citrophthora (IMI 399056 and IMI 399054, GenBank Accession Nos. JF699756 and JF699755) and P. nicotianae (IMI 399055, Accession No. JF699757), amplified by PCR using ITS universal primers (4), revealed 100% similarity with reference isolates of P. citrophthora (Accession Nos. GU259324.1 and GU259317.1) and P. nicotianae (Accession No. GU983635.1). P. citrophthora (n = 2) and P. nicotianae (n = 1) were pathogenic when wounded detached twigs (n = 5) of N. macrocarpa and N. obliqua were inoculated with 20 μl of a mycelial suspension (106 CFU/ml) of either Phytophthora spp. Twigs were placed in a moist chamber at 20°C for 12 days prior to determine the length of the necrotic lesions that developed. An equal number of noninoculated twigs were left as control. Reisolation of P. citrophthora and P. nicotianae from inoculated material was 100%. The length of the necrotic lesions (13 to 80 mm) from inoculated N. macrocarpa and N. obliqua was significantly greater (P < 0.05) compared with the controls. Regardless of Phytophthora isolates, necrotic lesions (53.9 ± 15.8 mm) in infected N. macrocarpa were significantly longer than in N. obliqua (28.6 ± 13.1 mm) (P < 0.0001). To our knowledge, this is the first report of P. citrophthora and P. nicotianae associated with dieback on N. macrocarpa in Chile. Therefore, there is a potential risk of Phytophthora dieback in N. macrocarpa in nature. References: (1) J. Ampuero et al. Plant Dis. 92:1529, 2008. (2) D. C. Erwin and O. K. Ribeiro. Phytophthora Diseases Worldwide. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN, 1996. (3) B. A. Latorre and R. Muñoz. Plant Dis. 77:715, 1993. (4) T. J. White et al. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego, 1990.