Identifying the particular guilds of herbivore arthropods that affect the production of crops is key to developing sustainable pest-management strategies; however, there is incomplete information about the identity of herbivore arthropods that could potentially damage the production of both highland and lowland quinoa landraces grown in Chile. By both reviewing the literature and conducting field collections across a large latitudinal gradient, we generated an updated list of 43 herbivore arthropods associated with quinoa production in Chile. In general, most species are polyphagous feeders, and only seven are specialists. The number and identity of species varied in relation with the latitude, such that four distinctive assemblages of herbivores were identified, each containing 32, 27, 34, and 22 species between latitudes 18–26, 26–32, 32–40, and 40–44° S, respectively. The most northern production area (18–26° S) is affected by nine unique species, including the major quinoa pest Eurysacca quinoae Povolný (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Similarly, the central area (32–40° S) contains four unique species, including Eurysacca media Povolný (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) and Orthotylus flavosparsus (Sahlberg) (Hemiptera: Miridae). The particular species assemblages described here will help further development of local pest-management practices.

Understanding plant tolerance to defoliation is crucial for sustainable pest management and reducing pesticide use in food production. This study explores quinoa’s (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) responses to foliar damage, which have been largely unexamined. Over two seasons, quinoa plants were subjected to mechanical defoliation at different pre-reproductive stages and intensities (0–60%) in the first season, and both mechanical and insect-induced (Trichoplusia ni (Hübner), Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) defoliation in the second. The results showed that quinoa plants consistently tolerated defoliation without reductions in grain number, weight, above-ground biomass, or harvest index. These compensatory responses were independent of the defoliation method, timing, or intensity. In the first season, overcompensatory effects were observed, leading to increased plant biomass at 60% early defoliation and 40% late defoliation. Additionally, early defoliation at 20% and 60%, as well as late defoliation at 60%, led to an increase in grain number without affecting grain weight. Defoliation did not significantly alter the phenolic content, sapogenins, or antioxidant capacity of the grains, preserving their phytochemical quality. These findings enhance the understanding of quinoa’s resilience to herbivory, suggesting that it can withstand defoliation stress without compromising yield or quality.