Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TIRADS) in combination with shear wave elastography (SWE) for the assessment of thyroid nodules. Methods: A prospective study was conducted with the following inclusion criteria: preoperative B-mode ultrasound (US) including TIRADS classification (Kwak-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS), quantitative SWE and available histological results. Results: Out of 43 patients, 61 thyroid nodules were detected; 10 nodules were found to be thyroid cancer (7 PTC, 1 FTC, 2 HüCC) and 51 were benign. According to Kwak-TIRADS the majority of benign nodules (47 out of 51, 92.2%) were classified in the low-risk- and intermediate-risk class, four nodules were classified as high-risk (7.8%). When using EU-TIRADS, the benign nodules were distributed almost equally across all risk classes, 21 (41.2%) nodules were classified in the low-risk class, 16 (31.4%) in the intermediate-risk class and 14 (27.4%) in the high-risk class. In contrast, most of the malignant nodules (eight out of ten) were classified as high-risk on EU-TIRADS. One carcinoma was classified as low-risk and one as intermediate-risk nodule. For SWE, ROC analysis showed an optimal cutoff of 18.5 kPa to distinguish malignant and benign nodules (sensitivity 80.0%, specificity 49.0%, PPV 23.5% and NPV 92.6%). The addition of elastography resulted in an increase of accuracy from 65.6% to 82.0% when using Kwak-TIRADS and from 49.2% to 72.1% when using EU-TIRADS. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that the combination of TIRADS and SWE seems to be superior for the risk stratification of thyroid nodules than each method by itself. However, verification of these results in a larger patient population is mandatory.

Purpose: (i) To examine the criterion taller-than-wide (TTW) for the sonographic assessment of thyroid nodules in areas of iodine deficiency in terms of frequency, anatomical distribution within the thyroid gland and risk of malignancy. (ii) To develop a model for nodule growth in the thyroid gland. Methods: German multicenter study consisting of two parts. In the prospective part, thyroid nodules were sonographically measured in all three dimensions, location within the thyroid gland and contact to a protrusion-like formation (horn) in the dorsal position of thyroid gland was noted. In addition, further sonographic features such as the composition, echogenity, margins and calcifications were investigated. All nodules from the prospective part were assessed for malignancy as part of clinical routine at the decision of the treating physician adhering to institutionally based algorithms. In the retrospective part, only nodules with fine needle aspiration and/or histology were included. The risk of malignancy in TTW nodules was determined by correlating them with cyotological and histological results. Results: Prospective part: out of 441 consecutively evaluated thyroid nodules, 6 were found to be malignant (1.4%, 95% CI 0.6–2.7%). Among the 74 TTW nodules (17%), 1 was malignant (1%, 95% CI 0–4%). TTW nodules were more often located in the dorsal half of the thyroid than non-TTW nodules (factor 2.3, p = 0.01, 95% CI 2.1–2.5) and more often located in close proximity to a horn than non-TTW nodules (factor 3.0, p = 0.01, 95% CI 2.4–3.8). Retrospective part: out of 1315 histologically and/or cytologically confirmed thyroid nodules, 163 TTW nodules were retrieved and retrospectively analyzed. A TTW nodule was 1.7 times more often benign when it was dorsal (95% CI 1.1–2.5) and 2.5 times more often benign when it was associated with a horn (95% CI 1.2–5.3). The overall probability of malignancy for TTW nodules was 38% (95% CI 30–46%) in this highly preselected patient group. Conclusion: TTW nodules are common in iodine deficient areas. They are often located in the dorsal half of the thyroid gland and are frequently associated with a dorsal protrusion-like formation (horn) of the thyroid. Obviously, the shape of benign nodules follows distinct anatomical preconditions within the thyroid gland. The frequency of TTW nodules and their predominant benignity can be explained by a pole concept of goiter growth. The difference between the low malignancy risk of TTW nodules found on a prospective basis and the high risk found retrospectively may be the result of a positive preselection in the latter.

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of video sequences (cine-loops) on the interobserver agreement (IOA) using risk stratification systems (RSSs) for thyroid nodules (TNs). Methods: Twenty TNs were randomly selected from a large database and evaluated by twelve experienced observers using five different RSSs (Kwak-, ACR-, EU-, Korean-TIRADS, ATA Guidelines). In the first step, the evaluation was conducted based on static ultrasound (US) images in two planes (“static”). Six months later, these cases were reevaluated by the same observers using video sequences in two planes (“cine-loops”). Fleiss’ kappa (κ) was calculated for the IOA analyses. Results: IOA on static was moderate with κ values of 0.46, 0.42, 0.40, 0.45, and 0.38 for the Kwak-, ACR-, EU-, Korean-TIRADS, and ATA Guidelines, respectively, while the IOA on cine-loops was fair with κ values of 0.41, 0.38, 0.37, 0.36, and 0.34 for the Kwak-, ACR-, EU-, Korean-TIRADS, and ATA Guidelines, respectively. The overall IOA was superior in static images versus cine-loops (p = 0.024). Among other findings, the subgroup analyses (related to age, gender, US certificates, number of thyroid US per week, and RSSs experience) particularly showed that the experience of the observers in using RSSs had a significant influence on the IOA. Conclusions: The overall IOA (all twelve observers and all five RSSs) was superior on static US images in comparison to cine-loops. Furthermore, the overall IOA of the five US features revealed superior κ values of the static images over cine-loops. However, this impact was significantly lower when the observers were highly experienced in the use of US RSSs of TNs.

Background: To examine the applicability of the “taller than wide” (ttw) criterium for risk assessment of thyroid nodules (TNs) in primary/secondary care units and the role of thyroid scintigraphy therein. Methods: German bicenter study performed in a setting of primary/secondary care. Patient recruitment and analysis in center A was conducted in a prospective manner. In center B, patient data were retrieved from a database that was originally generated by prospective data collection. TNs were assessed by ultrasound and thyroid scans, mostly fine needle biopsy and occasionally surgery and others. In center A, only patients who presented for the first time were included. The inclusion criterion was any TN ≥ 10 mm that had at least the following two sonographic risk features: solidity and a ttw shape. In center B, consecutive patients who had at least ttw and hypofunctioning nodules ≥ 10 mm were retrieved from the above-mentioned database. The risk of malignancy was determined according to a mixed reference standard and compared with literature data. Results: In center A, 223 patients with 259 TNs were included into the study. For further analysis, 200 nodules with a reference standard were available. The overall malignancy rate was 2.5% (upper limit of the 95% CI: 5.1%). After the exclusion of scintigraphically hyperfunctioning nodules, the malignancy rate increased slightly to 2.8% (upper limit of the 95% CI: 5.7%). Malignant nodules exhibited sonographic risk features additional to solidity and ttw shape more often than benign ones. In addition to the exclusion of hyperfunctioning nodules, when considering only nodules without additional US risk features, i.e., exclusively solid and ttw-nodules, the malignancy rate decreased to 0.9% (upper limit 95% CI: 3.7%). In center B, from 58 patients, 58 ttw and hypofunctioning TNs on thyroid scans with a reference standard were available. Malignant nodules from center B were always solid and hypoechoic. The overall malignancy rate of hypofunctioning and ttw nodules was 21%, with the lower limit of the 95% CI (one-sided) being 12%. Conclusions: In primary/secondary care units, the lowest TIRADS categories for indicating FNB, e.g., applying one out of five sonographic risk features, may not be appropriate owing to the much lower a priori malignancy risk in TNs compared to tertiary/quaternary care units. Even the combination of two sonographic risk features, “solidity” and “ttw”, may only be appropriate in a limited fashion. In contrast, the preselection of TNs according to hypofunctioning findings on thyroid scans clearly warranted FNB, even when applying only one sonographic risk criterion (“ttw”). For this reason, thyroid scans in TNs may not only be indicated to rule out hyperfunctioning nodules from FNB but also to rule in hypofunctioning ones.

Background: Thyroid nodules are very common. In most cases, they are benign, but they can be malignant in a low percentage of cases. The accurate assessment of these nodules is critical to choosing the next diagnostic steps and potential treatment. Ultrasound (US) imaging, the primary modality for assessing these nodules, can lack objectivity due to varying expertise among physicians. This leads to observer variability, potentially affecting patient outcomes. Purpose: This study aims to assess the potential of a Decision Support System (DSS) in reducing these variabilities for thyroid nodule detection and region estimation using US images, particularly in lesser experienced physicians. Methods: Three physicians with varying levels of experience evaluated thyroid nodules on US images, focusing on nodule detection and estimating cystic and solid regions. The outcomes were compared to those obtained from a DSS for comparison. Metrics such as classification match percentage and variance percentage were used to quantify differences. Results: Notable disparities exist between physician evaluations and the DSS assessments: the overall classification match percentage was just 19.2%. Individually, Physicians 1, 2, and 3 had match percentages of 57.6%, 42.3%, and 46.1% with the DSS, respectively. Variances in assessments highlight the subjectivity and observer variability based on physician experience levels. Conclusions: The evident variability among physician evaluations underscores the need for supplementary decision-making tools. Given its consistency, the CAD offers potential as a reliable “second opinion” tool, minimizing human-induced variabilities in the critical diagnostic process of thyroid nodules using US images. Future integration of such systems could bolster diagnostic precision and improve patient outcomes.

Purpose To evaluate the recommendations for or against fine needle biopsy (FNB) of hypofunctioning thyroid nodules (TNs) using of five different Ultrasound (US) -based risk stratification systems (RSSs). Methods German multicenter study with 563 TNs (≥ 10 mm) in 534 patients who underwent thyroid US and surgery. All TNs were evaluated with ACR TI-RADS, EU-TIRADS, ATA, K-TIRADS 2016 and modified K-TIRADS 2021. A correct recommendation was defined as: malignant TN with recommendation for FNB (appropriate) or benign TN without recommendation for FNB (avoided). An incorrect recommendation was defined as: malignant TN without recommendation for FNB (missed) or benign TN with recommendation for FNB (unnecessary). Results ACR TI-RADS demonstrated the highest rate of correct (42.3 %) and lowest rate of incorrect recommendations (57.7 %). The other RRSs showed similar results for correct (26.5 %–35.7 %) and incorrect (64.3 %–73.5 %) recommendations. ACR TI-RADS demonstrated the lowest rate of unnecessary (73.4 %) and the highest rate of appropriate (26.6 %) FNB recommendation. For other RSSs, the rates of unnecessary and appropriate FNB were between 75.2 %–77.1 % and 22.9 %–24.8 %. The lowest rate of missed FNB (14.7 %) and the highest rate of avoided FNB (85.3 %) was found for ACR TI-RADS. For the other RSSs, the rates of missed and avoided FNB were between 17.8 %–26.9 % and 73.1 %–82.2 %. When the size cutoff was disregarded, an increase of correct recommendations and a decrease of incorrect recommendations was observed for all RSSs. Conclusion The RSSs vary in their ability to correctly recommend for or against FNB. An understanding of the impact of nodule size cutoffs seems necessary for the future of TIRADS.