Christoph Reinhold Arnold

Dr. Christoph Reinhold Arnold

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 February 2020 in Frontiers in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CAChristoph Reinhold Arnold
Christoph Reinhold Arnold
JMJulian Mangesius
Julian Mangesius
Ira-Ida SkvortsovaIra-Ida Skvortsova
Ira-Ida Skvortsova
UGUte Ganswindt
Ute Ganswindt
Cancer stem cells (CSC) are a distinct subpopulation within a tumor. They are able to self-renew and differentiate and possess a high capability to repair DNA damage, exhibit low levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and proliferate slowly. These features render CSC resistant to various therapies, including radiation therapy (RT). Eradication of all CSC is a requirement for an effective antineoplastic treatment and is therefore of utmost importance for the patient. This makes CSC the prime targets for any therapeutic approach. Albeit clinical data is still scarce, experimental data and first clinical trials give hope that CSC-targeted treatment has the potential to improve antineoplastic therapies, especially for tumors that are known to be treatment resistant, such as glioblastoma. In this review, we will discuss CSC in the context of RT, describe known mechanisms of resistance, examine the possibilities of CSC as biomarkers, and discuss possible new treatment approaches.

18 December 2019 in Radiation Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJulian Mangesius
Julian Mangesius
TSThomas Seppi
Thomas Seppi
RWRocco Weigel
Rocco Weigel
CAChristoph Reinhold Arnold
Christoph Reinhold Arnold
DVDanijela Vasiljevic
Danijela Vasiljevic
MNMeinhard Nevinny-Stickel
Meinhard Nevinny-Stickel
Background: The present study investigates the intrafractional accuracy of a frameless thermoplastic mask used for head immobilization during stereotactic radiotherapy. Non-invasive masks cannot completely prohibit head movements. Previous studies attempted to estimate the magnitude of intrafractional inaccuracy by means of pre- and postfractional measurements only. However, this might not be sufficient to accurately map also intrafractional head movements. Materials and methods: Intrafractional deviation of mask-fixed head positions was measured in five patients during a total of 94 fractions by means of close-meshed repeated ExacTrac measurements (every 1.4 min) conducted during the entire treatment session. A median of six (range: 4 to 11) measurements were recorded per fraction, delivering a dataset of 453 measurements. Results: Random errors (SD) for the x, y and z axes were 0.27 mm, 0.29 mm and 0.29 mm, respectively. Median 3D deviation was 0.29 mm. Of all 3D intrafractional motions, 5.5 and 0.4% exceeded 1 mm and 2 mm, respectively. A moderate correlation between treatment duration and mean 3D displacement was determined (rs = 0.45). Mean 3D deviation increased from 0.21 mm (SD = 0.26 mm) in the first 2 min to a maximum of 0.53 mm (SD = 0.31 mm) after 10 min of treatment time. Conclusion: Pre- and post-treatment measurement is not sufficient to adequately determine the range of intrafractional head motion. Thermoplastic masks provide both reliable interfractional and intrafractional immobilization for image-guided stereotactic hypofractionated radiotherapy. Greater positioning accuracy may be obtained by reducing treatment duration (< 6 min) and applying intrafractional correction. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03896555, Registered 01 April 2019 - retrospectively registered.

21 April 2021 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJulian Mangesius
Julian Mangesius
TSThomas Seppi
Thomas Seppi
KBKatie Bates
Katie Bates
CAChristoph Reinhold Arnold
Christoph Reinhold Arnold
DMDanijela Minasch
Danijela Minasch
MNMeinhard Nevinny-Stickel
Meinhard Nevinny-Stickel
Overall survival (OS) of patients with brain metastases treated with hypofractionated (HFSRT) or single-fraction (SRS) radiosurgery depends on several prognostic factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of sex as an independent predictor of OS and evaluate the predictive accuracy of common prognostic scores. Retrospective analysis of 281 consecutive patients receiving radiosurgery of brain metastases was performed. Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare OS between SRS and HFSRT and by sex, before and after propensity-score matching (PSM) on key baseline prognostic covariates. Prognostic scores were evaluated using Harrell’s concordance index. Median OS was 11 months after both SRS and HFSRT. After PSM, median OS was 12 months after SRS (95% CI: 7.5–16.5) and 9 months after HFSRT (95% CI: 5.0–13.0; p = 0.77). Independent prognostic factors were sex, primary tumor, KPI, and systemic disease status. Median OS was 16 months for women and 7 months for male patients (p < 0.001). After excluding sex specific tumors, PSM revealed a median OS of 16 months for women and 8 months for male patients (p < 0.01). Evaluation of prognostic indices showed BSBM to be the most accurate (Harrell’s C = 0.68), followed by SIR (0.61), GPA (0.60), RPA (0.58), and Rades et al. (0.57). OS after HFSRT and SRS did not differ, although PSM revealed a non-significant advantage for SRS. Female sex was found to be a major independent positive prognostic factor for survival, and thus should be considered in the personalized decision-making of brain metastases treatment.

26 March 2024 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJulian Mangesius
Julian Mangesius
TSThomas Seppi
Thomas Seppi
CAChristoph Reinhold Arnold
Christoph Reinhold Arnold
SMStephanie Mangesius
Stephanie Mangesius
JKJohannes Kerschbaumer
Johannes Kerschbaumer
UGUte Ganswindt
Ute Ganswindt
This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcome of stereotactic radiosurgery as the sole treatment for brain metastases and to assess prognostic factors influencing survival. A total of 108 consecutive patients with 213 metastases were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment was determined with close-meshed MRI follow-up. Various prognostic factors were assessed, and several prognostic indices were compared regarding their reliability to estimate overall survival. Median overall survival was 15 months; one-year overall survival was 50.5%. Both one- and two-year local controls were 90.9%. The rate of new metastases after SRS was 49.1%. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors revealed that the presence of extracranial metastases, male sex, lower KPI, and progressive extracranial disease were significant risk factors for decreased survival. Of all evaluated prognostic indices, the Basic Score for Brain Metastases (BSBMs) showed the best correlation with overall survival. A substantial survival advantage was found for female patients after SRS when compared to male patients (18 versus 9 months, p = 0.003). SRS of brain metastasis is a safe and effective treatment option when frequent monitoring for new metastases with MRI is performed. Common prognostic scores lack reliable estimation of survival times. Female sex should be considered as an additional independent positive prognostic factor influencing survival.

30 May 2024 in Frontiers in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CAChristoph Reinhold Arnold
Christoph Reinhold Arnold
JMJulian Mangesius
Julian Mangesius
IPIana Portnaia
Iana Portnaia
UGUte Ganswindt
Ute Ganswindt
HWHendrik Andreas Wolff
Hendrik Andreas Wolff
Despite a comparatively favorable prognosis relative to other malignancies, breast cancer continues to significantly impact women’s health globally, partly due to its high incidence rate. A critical factor in treatment failure is radiation resistance – the capacity of tumor cells to withstand high doses of ionizing radiation. Advancements in understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying radioresistance, coupled with enhanced characterization of radioresistant cell clones, are paving the way for the development of novel treatment modalities that hold potential for future clinical application. In the context of combating radioresistance in breast cancer, potential targets of interest include long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), micro RNAs (miRNAs), and their associated signaling pathways, along with other signal transduction routes amenable to pharmacological intervention. Furthermore, technical, and methodological innovations, such as the integration of hyperthermia or nanoparticles with radiotherapy, have the potential to enhance treatment responses in patients with radioresistant breast cancer. This review endeavors to provide a comprehensive survey of the current scientific landscape, focusing on novel therapeutic advancements specifically addressing radioresistant breast cancer.

1 May 2017 in Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CAChristoph Reinhold Arnold
Christoph Reinhold Arnold
FKFrank Kloss
Frank Kloss
SSSarvpreet Singh
Sarvpreet Singh
DVDanijela Vasiljevic
Danijela Vasiljevic
RSRobert Stigler
Robert Stigler
RGRobert Gassner
Robert Gassner