Mohamed Shaheen

Dr. Mohamed Shaheen

School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2017 in Engineering Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Mohamed ShaheenMohamed Shaheen
Mohamed Shaheen
Konstantinos Daniel TsavdaridisKonstantinos Daniel Tsavdaridis
Konstantinos Daniel Tsavdaridis
ESEmad Salem
Emad Salem

1 May 2020 in Fire Safety Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mohamed ShaheenMohamed Shaheen
Mohamed Shaheen
AFAndrew S.J. Foster
Andrew S.J. Foster
LCLee S. Cunningham
Lee S. Cunningham
SASheida Afshan
Sheida Afshan

1 February 2016 in Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Konstantinos Daniel TsavdaridisKonstantinos Daniel Tsavdaridis
Konstantinos Daniel Tsavdaridis
Mohamed ShaheenMohamed Shaheen
Mohamed Shaheen
CBCharalampos Baniotopoulos
Charalampos Baniotopoulos
ESEmad Salem
Emad Salem

1 September 2018 in Journal of Structural Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mohamed ShaheenMohamed Shaheen
Mohamed Shaheen
Konstantinos Daniel TsavdaridisKonstantinos Daniel Tsavdaridis
Konstantinos Daniel Tsavdaridis
Satoshi YamadaSatoshi Yamada
Satoshi Yamada
This paper investigates the behavior of reduced web section (RWS) steel–concrete composite (SCC) beam-to-column connections with circular web openings through a comprehensive finite element (FE) analysis following experimental and computational studies. Results showed that the presence of a circular web opening is effective to move the plastic hinge away from the column shear panel zone and the main connection components including the welding beam-column welding area, and hence, significantly improve the ductility and energy dissipation of the connection without critically affecting its capacity. The composite action was not considered in the literature to account for the severest case (slab acts as load only) in terms of load carrying capacity. However, this study proves that the composite effect has a decisive role in the calculation of the ductility and rotational capacity, and if not considered may result in an overestimated ductile behavior. On the other hand, in cases where composite action is not provided, depending on the particular flooring system, noncomposite steel connections may be considered where the ductility and energy dissipation gains are definitely higher but the load carrying capacity is lower. This paper establishes the comparison between composite and noncomposite connections and concludes that the contribution of the composite action to the load carrying capacity is higher with the increase of the beam web opening diameter. Therefore, the calculated negative load carrying capacity tends to be very conservative if the composite effect is neglected when a large opening diameter is used.

1 December 2020 in Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mohamed ShaheenMohamed Shaheen
Mohamed Shaheen
AFAndrew S. J. Foster
Andrew S. J. Foster
LCLee S. Cunningham
Lee S. Cunningham

1 October 2020 in Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mohamed ShaheenMohamed Shaheen
Mohamed Shaheen
AFAndrew S.J. Foster
Andrew S.J. Foster
LCLee S. Cunningham
Lee S. Cunningham
SASheida Afshan
Sheida Afshan