Satoshi Yamada

Prof. Dr. Satoshi Yamada

The University of Tokyo
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2008 in Journal of Structural Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TTToru Takeuchi
Toru Takeuchi
MIMari Ida
Mari Ida
Satoshi YamadaSatoshi Yamada
Satoshi Yamada
KSKazuaki Suzuki
Kazuaki Suzuki
Recently, passive vibration control design has gained popularity. The aim of this design is to absorb most of the seismic energy by using additional dampers while maintaining the elasticity of the main structure. Buckling restrained braces (BRBs) are used as one of the elastoplastic dampers in this design and, therefore, the cumulative deformation capacity of BRBs to the point of fatigue fracture is an important benchmark for their performance. The estimation of this value under a random amplitude is complicated however, as this value is affected by the loading history. In this study, past experiments on BRBs are revisited in order to investigate the relation between the cumulative deformation capacity and the applied loading history. Based on these analyses, a simple method is proposed for predicting the cumulative deformation and energy absorption capacities of BRBs under random amplitudes. In contrast to Miner’s method, the proposed method does not require analyses of the individual amplitudes, and the...

29 December 2014 in Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YJYu Jiao
Yu Jiao
SKShoichi Kishiki
Shoichi Kishiki
Satoshi YamadaSatoshi Yamada
Satoshi Yamada
DEDiana Ene
Diana Ene
YKYoshinao Konishi
Yoshinao Konishi
MTMasao Terashima
Masao Terashima

27 August 2015 in Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DEDiana Ene
Diana Ene
SKShoichi Kishiki
Shoichi Kishiki
Satoshi YamadaSatoshi Yamada
Satoshi Yamada
YJYu Jiao
Yu Jiao
YKYoshinao Konishi
Yoshinao Konishi
NKNorihisa Kawamura
Norihisa Kawamura

8 March 2011 in Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YJYu Jiao
Yu Jiao
Satoshi YamadaSatoshi Yamada
Satoshi Yamada
SKShoichi Kishiki
Shoichi Kishiki
YSYuko Shimada
Yuko Shimada

1 January 2009 in Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ)
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKeiichiro Suita
Keiichiro Suita
YMYuichi Matsuoka
Yuichi Matsuoka
Satoshi YamadaSatoshi Yamada
Satoshi Yamada
YSYuko Shimada
Yuko Shimada
MTMotohide Tada
Motohide Tada
KKKazuhiko Kasai
Kazuhiko Kasai

1 September 2018 in Journal of Structural Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mohamed ShaheenMohamed Shaheen
Mohamed Shaheen
Konstantinos Daniel TsavdaridisKonstantinos Daniel Tsavdaridis
Konstantinos Daniel Tsavdaridis
Satoshi YamadaSatoshi Yamada
Satoshi Yamada
This paper investigates the behavior of reduced web section (RWS) steel–concrete composite (SCC) beam-to-column connections with circular web openings through a comprehensive finite element (FE) analysis following experimental and computational studies. Results showed that the presence of a circular web opening is effective to move the plastic hinge away from the column shear panel zone and the main connection components including the welding beam-column welding area, and hence, significantly improve the ductility and energy dissipation of the connection without critically affecting its capacity. The composite action was not considered in the literature to account for the severest case (slab acts as load only) in terms of load carrying capacity. However, this study proves that the composite effect has a decisive role in the calculation of the ductility and rotational capacity, and if not considered may result in an overestimated ductile behavior. On the other hand, in cases where composite action is not provided, depending on the particular flooring system, noncomposite steel connections may be considered where the ductility and energy dissipation gains are definitely higher but the load carrying capacity is lower. This paper establishes the comparison between composite and noncomposite connections and concludes that the contribution of the composite action to the load carrying capacity is higher with the increase of the beam web opening diameter. Therefore, the calculated negative load carrying capacity tends to be very conservative if the composite effect is neglected when a large opening diameter is used.