Speciation is a complex process that can unfold in many different ways. Speciation researchers sometimes simplify core principles in their writing in a way that implies misconceptions about the speciation process. While we think that these misconceptions are usually inadvertently implied (and not actively believed) by the researchers, they nonetheless risk warping how external readers understand speciation. Here we highlight six misconceptions of speciation that are especially widespread. First, species are implied to be clearly and consistently defined entities in nature, whereas in reality species boundaries are often fuzzy and semipermeable. Second, speciation is often implied to be ‘good’, which is two-fold problematic because it implies both that evolution has a goal and that speciation universally increases the chances of lineage persistence. Third, species-poor clades with species-rich sister clades are considered ‘primitive’ or ‘basal’, falsely implying a ladder of progress. Fourth, the evolution of species is assumed to be strictly tree-like, but genomic findings show widespread hybridization more consistent with network-like evolution. Fifth, a lack of association between a trait and elevated speciation rates in macroevolutionary studies is often interpreted as evidence against its relevance in speciation—even if microevolutionary case studies show that it is relevant. Sixth, obvious trait differences between species are sometimes too readily assumed to be (i) barriers to reproduction, (ii) a stepping-stone to inevitable speciation, or (iii) reflective of the species’ whole divergence history. In conclusion, we call for caution, particularly when communicating science, because miscommunication of these ideas provides fertile ground for misconceptions to spread.

Nanofibers are drawing the attention of engineers and scientists because their large surface-to-volume ratio is favorable for applications in medicine, filter technology, textile industry, lithium-air batteries, and optical sensors. However, when transferring nanofibers to a technical product in the form of a random network of fibers, referred to as nonwoven fabric, the stickiness of the freshly produced and thus fragile nanofiber nonwoven remains a problem. This is mainly because nanofibers strongly adhere to any surface because of van der Waals forces. In nature, there are animals that are actually able to efficiently produce, process, and handle nanofibers, namely cribellate spiders. For that, the spiders use the calamistrum, a comb-like structure of modified setae on the metatarsus of the hindmost (fourth) legs, to which the 10–30 nm thick silk nanofibers do not stick due to a special fingerprint-like surface nanostructure. In this work, we present a theoretical model of the interaction of linear nanofibers with a sinusoidally corrugated surface. This model allows for a prediction of the adhesive interaction and, thus, the design of a suitable surface structure to prevent sticking of an artificially nonwoven of nanofibers. According to the theoretical prediction, a technical analogon of the nanoripples was produced by ultrashort pulse laser processing on different technically relevant metal surfaces in the form of so-called laser-induced periodic surface structures (LIPSS). Subsequently, by means of a newly established peel-off test, the adhesion of an electrospun polyamide fiber-based nonwoven was quantified on such LIPSS-covered aluminium alloy, steel, and titanium alloy samples, as well as on polished (flat) control samples as reference and, additionally, on samples with randomly rough surfaces. The latter revealed that the adhesion of electrospun nanofiber nonwoven is significantly lowered on the nanostructured surfaces compared with the polished surfaces.

Since nanofibers have a high surface-to-volume ratio, van der Waals forces render them attracted to virtually any surface. The high ratio provides significant advantages for applications in drug delivery, wound healing, tissue regeneration, and filtration. Cribellate spiders integrate thousands of nanofibers into their capture threads as an adhesive to immobilize their prey. These spiders have antiadhesive nanoripples on the calamistrum, a comb-like structure on their hindmost legs, and are thus an ideal model for investigating how nanofiber adhesion can be reduced. We found that these nanoripples had similar spacing in the cribellate species Uloborus plumipes, Amaurobius similis, and Menneus superciliosus, independent of phylogenetic relation and size. Ripple spacing on other body parts (i.e., cuticle, claws, and spinnerets), however, was less homogeneous. To investigate whether a specific distance between the ripples determines antiadhesion, we fabricated nanorippled foils by nanosecond UV laser processing. We varied the spatial periods of the nanoripples in the range ~ 203–613 nm. Using two different pulse numbers resulted in ripples of different heights. The antiadhesion was measured for all surfaces, showing that the effect is robust against alterations across the whole range of spatial periods tested. Motivated by these results, we fabricated irregular surface nanoripples with spacing in the range ~ 130–480 nm, which showed the same antiadhesive behavior. The tested surfaces may be useful in tools for handling nanofibers such as spoolers for single nanofibers, conveyor belts for producing endless nanofiber nonwoven, and cylindrical tools for fabricating tubular nanofiber nonwoven. Engineered fibers such as carbon nanotubes represent a further candidate application area.

Due to their uniquely high surface-to-volume ratio, nanofibers are a desired material for various technical applications. However, this surface-to-volume ratio also makes processing difficult as van der Waals forces cause nanofibers to adhere to virtually any surface. The cribellate spider Uloborus plumipes represents a biomimetic paragon for this problem: these spiders integrate thousands of nanofibers into their adhesive capture threads. A comb on their hindmost legs, termed calamistrum, enables the spiders to process the nanofibers without adhering to them. This anti-adhesion is due to a rippled nanotopography on the calamistrum. Via laser-induced periodic surface structures (LIPSS), these nanostructures can be recreated on artificial surfaces, mimicking the non-stickiness of the calamistrum. In order to advance the technical implementation of these biomimetic structured foils, we investigated how climatic conditions influence the anti-adhesive performance of our surfaces. Although anti-adhesion worked well at low and high humidity, technical implementations should nevertheless be air-conditioned to regulate temperature: we observed no pronounced anti-adhesive effect at temperatures above 30 °C. This alteration between anti-adhesion and adhesion could be deployed as a temperature-sensitive switch, allowing to swap between sticking and not sticking to nanofibers. This would make handling even easier.

We investigated the effect of additional continuous functional coatings, which changed the hydrophilic–hydrophobic properties of the surface without heavily influencing the surface topography at the nanoscale, on the antiadhesive properties of bioinspired laser-induced periodic nanostructures. These nanostructures mimic the antiadhesive structures on the silk-combing area on the legs of cribellate spiders, the calamistrum. The thin films were deposited by matrix-assisted laser deposition and characterized by infrared spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, water contact angle measurements, and adhesion tests using capture threads from the cribellate spider webs. In all cases, the nanoripples were preserved and these structured surfaces showed lower adhesion forces compared to flat controls, although not significant. However, this effect was totally overwhelmed by the difference between the adhesion forces on surfaces with different chemical compositions. The largest adhesion forces were observed on hydrophilic surfaces and the lowest ones on hydrophobic surfaces. The fact that the antiadhesion between nanofibers and the nano-structured areas depends strongly on the chemical composition of the surface can be explained by the specific adhesion between individual chemical groups due to frequency dependencies in the theory of van der Waals forces. However, explaining these adhesion properties just by the categories “hydrophilic” or “hydrophobic” is oversimplified.

Typical orb webs with glue droplets are renewed regularly, sometimes multiple times per night. Such behaviour, however, is rarely found with cribellate spiders. The adhesive portion of their capture threads consist of nanofibres instead of glue, and the fibres interact with the cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) of their insect prey for adhesion. Many of these spiders often only add new threads to their existing webs instead of completely reconstructing them. In testing the adhesion force of aged capture threads of three different cribellate species, we indeed did not observe an overall decline in adhesion force, even after a period of over a year. This is in line with the (formulated but so far never tested) hypothesis that when comparing gluey capture threads to nanofibrous ones, one of the benefits of cribellate capture threads could be their notable resistance to drying out or other ageing processes.