The incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction is reported to 2–8%. The aim of the study (retrospectively registered) was to evaluate whether control coronary angiography after surgery is useful in case of suspected postoperative myocardial ischemia. All patients who demonstrated signs of myocardial ischemia post CABG and underwent coronary angiography from 6/2008 to 06/2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Myocardial ischemia post CABG was defined as an increase of CK/CK-MB, occasionally associated with arrhythmias or low output syndrome. Overall, 108 patients (age 66 ± 9 years) demonstrated signs of myocardial ischemia post CABG and underwent coronary angiography corresponding to an incidence of 2.2%. Of them, 70 patients (65%) demonstrated graft pathologies. A therapeutic consequence was drawn in 62 Patients (57%), which consisted of redo surgery in 10 patients (9%) and PCI with stent placement in 52 patients (48%). Of the remaining 46 patients, 29 patients showed intact bypass grafts (27%), whereas 17 patients had minor pathologies (16%). Demographic data including the extent of the coronary artery disease, urgency of operation, comorbidities, EuroScore, surgical technique, postoperative lab tests and transfusion requirements were comparable among the groups. Redo surgery patients had prior PCI in 33% of patients, which was much higher than in the other groups. Patients with reintervention had a 30d-mortality rate of 13%, conservatively treated patients only 2.2%. Mortality was highest after redo surgery with 25%. Postoperative coronary angiography is a useful tool with a significant therapeutic value. Pathological findings mandate further revascularization therapy in roughly half of the patients. PCI is a safe choice in the majority of patients, redo surgery is much less indicated.

Background: Extracorporeal life support systems are well-established devices for treating patients with acute cardiopulmonary failure. Severe or morbid obesity may result in complications such as limb ischemia, bleeding, unsuccessful cannulation, or infection at the cannulation sites. This article reports on our experience with cannulation and associated complications in severely and morbidly obese patients. Methods: Between January 2006 and September 2016, 153 severely or morbidly obese patients with a body mass index >35 kg/m² were cannulated percutaneously for extracorporeal life support at our center. Among those, 115 patients were treated with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) for acute lung failure and 38 patients with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) for cardiogenic shock. Complications related to percutaneous access and long-term follow-up were analyzed retrospectively. Primary focus was on the success of cannulation, outcome, thrombosis, bleeding, limb ischemia, and infection at the cannulation site. Normal-weight patients receiving extracorporeal life support served as control. Results: Percutaneous cannulation was successfully performed in all patients. Eighty-five (74%) patients were weaned from VV ECMO and 20 (52%) patients were weaned from VA ECMO. Limb ischemia requiring surgical intervention occurred in 5 (3%) patients, bleeding in 7 (5%) patients, and wound infection in 3 (2%) patients. In all other patients, decannulation was uneventful. These data as well as the long-term survival rates were comparable to those of normal-weight patients ( P > .05). Conclusion: Percutaneous vessel cannulation for extracorporeal life support systems is generally feasible. Therefore, percutaneous cannulation may well be performed in severely and morbidly obese patients. Patient outcome rather depends on appropriate support than on anatomy.

International academic publisher with offices worldwide. Publishing more than 2,100 journals, over 4,000 new books each year, with a books backlist in excess of 60,000 specialist titles. We are one of the world’s leading publishers of scholarly journals, books, eBooks, textbooks and reference works

Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) is the most widely used prognostic marker in cardiovascular diseases. LV global function index (LVGFI) is a novel marker which incorporates the total LV structure in the assessment of LV cardiac performance. We evaluated the prognostic significance of LVGFI, measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), in predicting mortality and ICD therapies in a real-world (ICD) population with secondary ICD prevention indication, to detect a high-risk group among these patients. In total, 105 patients with cardiac MRI prior to the ICD implantation were included (mean age 56 ± 16 years old; 76% male). Using the MRI data for each patient LVGFI was determined and a cut-off for the LVGFI value was calculated. Patients were followed up every four to six months in our or clinics in proximity. Data on the occurrence of heart failure symptoms and or mortality, as well as device therapies and other vital parameters, were collected. Follow up duration was 37 months in median. The mean LVGFI was 24.5%, the cut off value for LVGFI 13.5%. According to the LVGFI Index patient were divided into 2 groups, 86 patients in the group with the higher LVGFI und 19 patients in the lower group. The LVGFI correlates significantly with the LVEF (r = 0.642, p < 0.001). In Kaplan–Meier analysis, a lower LVGFI ( I, the initial device or a medication (each p = n.s.). Further, in Kaplan–Meier analysis no association was evident between the LVGFI and adequate ICD therapy (p = n.s.). In secondary prevention ICD patients reduced LVGFI was shown as an independent predictor for mortality and rehospitalization, but not for ICD therapies. We were able to identify a high-risk collective among these patients, but further investigation is needed to evaluate LVGFI compared to ejection fraction, especially in patients with an elevated risk for adverse cardiac events.

Extracorporeal life support system has been successfully used in patients with cardiac failure after open heart surgery, as a bridge to transplantation, and in patients with prolonged cardiogenic shock or cardiopulmonary arrest. This report presents our early experience with the new system Cardiohelp in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Between August 2010 and June 2011, 50 patients underwent CABG with the aid of Cardiohelp. This subgroup was matched for sex and logistic EuroSCORE with 100 patients, who underwent CABG using two different extracorporeal circulation systems, a minimized (MECC) (n = 50) and a conventional (CECC) (n = 50) during the same period. Because of less hemodilution, the intraoperative blood transfusion was significantly lower in the Cardiohelp group (36%) and MECC group (40%) compared with the CECC group (64%). Postoperative release of creatinine kinase and lactate was lower in the Cardiohelp and MECC groups (p < 0.001). Furthermore, these patients had shorter duration of ventilation and lengths of stay at the intensive care unit (p < 0.05). Device-related complications were not observed. A conversion to CECC was not necessary. In conclusion, the Cardiohelp is a safe alternative for CABG surgery. Valid technical innovations and limited number of side effects support its employment as a highly effective device for coronary surgery.

Background: Aim of the study was a better characterization of heart failure (HF) with recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF) and undulating EF (HFuEF) with regard to re‐hospitalization due to congestive HF (CHF), adequate electric therapies (AETs) and mortality compared to HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), mid‐range EF (HFmrEF) and preserved EF (pEF).Methods: Retrospective study of 342 participants with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for primary or secondary prevention. Type of HF was classified according to left ventricular EF with 4.7 ± 3.1 investigations for each patient.Results: Re‐hospitalization due to CHF was similar in HFrecEF (7 (9.5%)), HFmrEF (2(9.0%)) and pEF (8(12.9%); p = n.s.) and significantly higher in HFrEF (62(38.0%)) and HFuEF (6(28.6%); p < .001 compared to HFrecEF and HFrEF). AETs were significantly lower in HFrecEF (13(17.6%)) compared to HFrEF (57(35.0%)), HFmrEF (7(31.8%)), pEF (18(29.0%)) and HFuEF (6(28.6%); each p < .01 compared to HFrecEF). Mortality was similar in HFrecEF (6(8.1%)) compared to HFuEF (0(0%)), pEF (4(6.5%)) and HFmrEF (2(9.0%), p = n.s.) and significantly lower compared to HFrEF (52(31.9%), p < .001). HFrEF was the strongest predictor for mortality besides age and chronic renal insufficiency according to Cox Regression (each p < .05) opposite to arterial hypertension, diabetes, type of cardiomyopathy and secondary prevention ICD indication (each p = n.s.).Conclusions: HFrecEF indicates as a new entity of HF with similar prognosis as pEF and HFmrEF with regard to re‐hospitalization due to CHF and mortality and even better prognosis with regard to AETs. HFuEF showed similar rates of re‐hospitalization due to CHF and AETs compared to HFrEF, but lower rates of mortality.