Objective This study systematically reviews the outcomes of surgical repair of triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears. Existing surgical techniques include capsular sutures, suture anchors, and transosseous sutures. However, there is still no consensus as to which is the most reliable method for ulnar-sided peripheral and foveal TFCC tears. Methods A systematic review of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The focus was on traumatic Palmer 1B ulna-sided tears. Twenty-seven studies were included, including three comparative cohort studies. Results There was improvement in all functional outcome measures after repair of TFCC tears. The outcomes following peripheral and foveal repairs were good overall: Mayo Modified Wrist Evaluation (MMWE) score of 80.1 and 85.1, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score of 15.7 and 15.8, grip strength of 80.3 and 92.7% (of the nonoperated hand), and pain intensity score of 2.1 and 1.7, respectively. For peripheral tears, transosseous suture technique achieved better outcomes compared with capsular sutures in terms of grip strength, pain, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), and DASH scores (grip 85.8 vs. 77.7%; pain 1.5 vs. 2.2; PRWE 11.6 vs. 15.8; DASH 14.4 vs. 16.1). For foveal tears, transosseous sutures achieved overall better functional outcomes compared with suture anchors (MMWE 85.4 vs. 84.9, DASH 10.9 vs. 20.6, pain score 1.3 vs. 2.1), but did report slightly lower grip strength than the group with suture anchors (90.2 vs. 96.2%). Arthroscopic techniques achieved overall better outcomes compared with open repair technique. Conclusion Current evidence demonstrates that TFCC repair achieves good clinical outcomes, with low complication rates. Level of Evidence This is a Level IV, therapeutic study.

We compared four methods of metacarpal shaft fixation: 2.2 mm intramedullary headless compression screw; 3.0 mm intramedullary headless compression screw; intramedullary K-wire fixation; and dorsal plate fixation. Transverse mid-diaphyseal fractures were created in 64 metacarpal sawbones and were assigned into four groups. Peak load to failure and stiffness were measured in cantilever bending and torsion. We found that dorsal plating had the highest peak load to failure. However, initial bending stiffness of the 3.0 mm intramedullary headless compression screw was higher than that of the dorsal plates. In torsion testing, dorsal plating had the highest peak torque, but there was no significant difference in torsional stiffness between the plate and intramedullary headless compression screw constructs. We concluded that intramedullary headless compression screw fixation is biomechanically superior to K-wires in cantilever bending and torsion; however, it is less stable than dorsal plating. In our study, the initial stability provided by K-wire fixation was sufficient to cope with expected loads in the early rehabilitation period, whereas dorsal plates and IHCS constructs provided stability far in excess of what is required.

Background: Acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) can be devastating complications leading to substantial functional impairments. The purpose of this study was to review factors associated with increased acromial and scapular spine strain after RTSA from a biomechanical standpoint. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted based on PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, OVID Medline, and CENTRAL databases were searched and strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Each article was assessed using the modified Downs and Black checklist to appraise the quality of included studies. Study selection, extraction of data, and assessment of methodological quality were carried out independently by two of the authors. Only biomechanical studies were considered. Results: Six biomechanical studies evaluated factors associated with increased acromial and scapular spine strain and stress. Significant increases in acromial and scapular spine strain were found with increasing lateralization of the glenosphere in four of the included studies. In two studies, glenosphere inferiorization consistently reduced acromial strain. The results concerning humeral lateralization were variable between four studies. Humeral component neck-shaft angle had no significant effect on acromial strain as analysed in one study. One study showed that scapular spine strain was significantly increased with a more posteriorly oriented acromion (55° vs. 43°; p < 0.001). Another study showed that the transection of the coracoacromial ligament increased scapular spine strain in all abduction angles (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Glenoid lateralization was consistently associated with increased acromial and scapular spine strain, whereas inferiorization of the glenosphere reduced strain in the biomechanical studies analysed in this systematic review. Humeral-sided lateralization may increase or decrease acromial or scapular spine strain. Independent of different design parameters, the transection of the coracoacromial ligament resulted in significantly increased strains and scapular spine strains were also increased when the acromion was more posteriorly oriented. The results found in this systematic review of biomechanical in-silico and in-vitro studies may help in the surgical planning of RTSA to mitigate complications associated with acromion and scapular spine fracture.

Fractures of the acromion and the scapular spine are established complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), and when they occur, the continuous strain by the deltoid along the bony fragments makes healing difficult. Evidence on treatment specific outcomes is poor, making the definition of a gold standard fixation technique difficult. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess whether any particular fixation construct offers improved clinical and/or radiographic outcomes. A systematic review of the literature on fixation of acromial and scapular spine fractures following RSA was carried out based on the guidelines of PRISMA. The search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, OVID Medline, and CENTRAL databases with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria applied. Methodological quality assessment of each included study was done using the modified Coleman methodology score to asses MQOE. Selection of the studies, data extraction and methodological quality assessment was carried out by two of the authors independently. Only clinical studies reporting on fixation of the aforementioned fractures were considered. Fixation construct, fracture union and time to union, shoulder function and complications were investigated. Nine studies reported on fixation strategies for acromial and scapular spine fractures and were therefore included. The 18 reported results related to fractures in 17 patients; 1 was classified as a Levy Type I fracture, 10 as a Levy Type II fracture and the remaining 7 fractures were defined as Levy Type III. The most frequent fixation construct in type II scapular spine fractures was a single plate (used in 6 of the 10 cases), whereas dual platin was the most used fixation for Levy Type III fractures (5 out of 7). Radiographic union was reported in 15 out of 18 fractures, whereas 1 patient (6.7%) had a confirmed non-union of a Levy Type III scapular spine fracture, requiring revision fixation. There were 5 complications reported, with 2 patients undergoing removal of metal and 1 patient undergoing revision fixation. The Subjective Shoulder Value and Visual Analogue Scale pain score averaged 75% and 2.6 points, respectively. The absolute Constant Score and the ASES score averaged 48.2 and 78.3 points, respectively. With the available data, it is not possible to define a gold standard surgical fixation but it seems that even when fracture union can be achieved, functional outcomes are moderate and there is an increased complication rate. Future studies are required to establish a gold standard fixation technique.