Jake Bishop

Dr. Jake Bishop

School of Agriculture Policy and Development, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AH, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2016 in Nature Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJosef Settele
Josef Settele
JBJake Bishop
Jake Bishop
SPSimon G. Potts
Simon G. Potts

1 March 2020 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CHCaroline Harkness
Caroline Harkness
MSMikhail A. Semenov
Mikhail A. Semenov
FAFrancisco Jose Areal
Francisco Jose Areal
NSNimai Senapati
Nimai Senapati
Miroslav TrnkaMiroslav Trnka
Miroslav Trnka
JBJake Bishop
Jake Bishop
• Adverse weather conditions were analysed using a range of adverse weather indices. • Future UK climate is expected to remain favourable for wheat production. • Wetter winter and spring could, however, increase the risk of waterlogging. • Use of global climate model ensembles to quantify prediction uncertainty is advised.

21 March 2016 in Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJake Bishop
Jake Bishop
SPS. G. Potts
S. G. Potts
HJH. E. Jones
H. E. Jones
Experiments were conducted over 2 years to quantify the response of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) to heat stress. Potted winter faba bean plants (cv. Wizard) were exposed to temperature treatments (18/10; 22/14; 26/18; 30/22; 34/26 °C day/night) for 5 days during floral development and anthesis. Developmental stages of all flowers were scored prior to stress, plants were grown in exclusion from insect pollinators to prevent pollen movement between flowers, and yield was harvested at an individual pod scale, enabling effects of heat stress to be investigated at a high resolution. Susceptibility to stress differed between floral stages; flowers were most affected during initial green‐bud stages. Yield and pollen germination of flowers present before stress showed threshold relationships to stress, with lethal temperatures (t50) ˜28 °C and ~32 °C, while whole plant yield showed a linear negative relationship to stress with high plasticity in yield allocation, such that yield lost at lower nodes was partially compensated at higher nodal positions. Faba bean has many beneficial attributes for sustainable modern cropping systems but these results suggest that yield will be limited by projected climate change, necessitating the development of heat tolerant cultivars, or improved resilience by other mechanisms such as earlier flowering times.

1 March 2016 in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JBJake Bishop
Jake Bishop
HJHannah Elizabeth Jones
Hannah Elizabeth Jones
Martin LukacMartin Lukac
Martin Lukac
SPSimon Geoffrey Potts
Simon Geoffrey Potts
• Heat stress results in lower yields in faba bean. • Insect pollination partially recovered faba bean yield loss following heat stress. • Increased transfer of pollen to damaged flowers is the likely mechanism. • Insect pollination may increase production stability under increasing heat stress.

27 December 2020 in Journal of Applied Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJake Bishop
Jake Bishop
SNShinichi Nakagawa
Shinichi Nakagawa
Biotic pollination can benefit crop production, but its effects are highly variable. To maximise benefits from this ecosystem service, we need a greater understanding of the factors that cause variation so that ecological intensification can be more effectively applied. We focus on understanding the benefits of pollination to faba bean Vicia faba. We use a literature review followed by multi‐level meta‐analysis to estimate overall benefits of pollination to faba bean yield and to quantify variation (heterogeneity) in these benefits associated with different contextual factors (e.g. plant genotype, growing environment). Our overall estimate of pollination benefit to faba bean yield, expressed as the percentage yield reduction without pollination, is 32.9% (confidence interval: 21%–43%). Based on the prediction intervals, which include the heterogeneity in pollination benefit, there is an 80% chance that pollination will increase yield of a faba bean crop. Half of all heterogeneity in pollination dependence was due to differences between plant genotypes. The number of beans per plant showed similar pollination dependence to yield mass per plant while pod number and number of beans per pod underestimated yield benefits. There was weak evidence to suggest pollination benefits vary between pollinator species, with honeybees showing a smaller yield increase. Differences in the experimental method used to assess pollination benefit did not significantly affect the estimate, including the growing environment, measurement scale, or whether the effects of experimental pollinator enclosures were controlled. This suggests that simplified experimental studies comparing yield of open‐pollinated and enclosed plants can provide reliable insights into pollination benefits across a large range of plant genotypes and landscapes. Synthesis and application. We found high variability in pollination benefits both between and within publications in our meta‐analysis. Plant genotype, how yield was measured, and pollinator species affected the level of pollination benefit. Despite variability in pollination benefits due to various contextual factors (both inside and outside of grower control), there is a high likelihood that biotic pollination will increase faba bean yield. Our findings support ecological intensification and specifically the management of pollinators to maximise pollination benefits to faba bean production.

1 September 2020 in Journal of Functional Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MGMyriam Grundy
Myriam Grundy
DMDorah K. Momanyi
Dorah K. Momanyi
CHClaire Holland
Claire Holland
FKFanuel Kawaka
Fanuel Kawaka
STSerene Tan
Serene Tan
WOWillis O. Owino
Willis O. Owino