Drilling fluids and oil well cement are important well barriers. Their compatibility affects the long-term integrity of the well. The mixing of drilling fluid with the oil well cement causes contamination of oil well cement. If the contamination is due to diesel/oil-based drilling fluid (OBF) it adversely affects the rheological and mechanical properties of oil well cement—in other words, the long-term integrity of the well. An initial study on OBF contamination of oil well cement was carried out two decades ago. In recent years, several research projects were carried out on the same topic to understand the reason for changes in the properties of oil well cement with OBF contamination. This literature review shows that using OBF eliminates several drilling problems, as the long-term integrity of the well depends on the amount of OBF contamination in the cement slurry. This paper compares the experiments performed, results and conclusions drawn from selected research studies on OBF contamination of oil well cement. Their shortcomings and a way forward are discussed in detail. A critical review of these research studies highlights the need for new and accurate correlations for OBF-contaminated oil well cement to predict the long-term integrity of wells.

Increasing concern over climate change has made Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) an important tool. Operators use deep geologic reservoirs as a form of favorable geological storage for long-term CO₂ sequestration. However, the success of CCS hinges on the integrity of wells penetrating these formations, particularly legacy wells, which often exhibit significant uncertainties regarding cement tops in the annular space between the casing and formation, especially around or below the primary seal. Misalignment of cement plugs with the primary seal increases the risk of CO₂ migrating beyond the seal, potentially creating pathways for fluid flow into upper formations, including underground sources of drinking water (USDW). These wells may not be leaking but might fail to meet the legal requirements of some federal and state agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC), California CalGEM, and Pennsylvania DEP. This review evaluates the impact of CO₂ exposure on cement and casing integrity including the fluid transport mechanisms, fracture behaviors, and operational stresses such as cyclic loading. Findings revealed that slow fluid circulation and confining pressure, primarily from overburden stress, promote self-sealing through mineral precipitation and elastic crack closure, enhancing well integrity. Sustained casing pressure can be a good indicator of well integrity status. While full-physics models provide accurate leakage prediction, surrogate models offer faster results as risk assessment tools. Comprehensive data collection on wellbore conditions, cement and casing properties, and environmental factors is essential to enhance predictive models, refine risk assessments, and develop effective remediation strategies for the long-term success of CCS projects.

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has been recognized as a pivotal technology for mitigating climate change by reducing CO₂ emissions. Storing CO₂ in deep saline aquifers requires preserving the water-wet nature of the formation throughout the storage period, which is crucial for maintaining rock integrity and storage efficiency. However, the wettability of formations can change upon exposure to supercritical CO₂ (scCO₂), potentially compromising storage efficiency. Despite extensive studies on various factors influencing wettability alteration, a significant research gap remains in understanding the effects of different CO₂ injection strategies on wettability in deep saline formations (DSFs). This study addresses this gap by investigating how three distinct CO₂ injection strategies—continuous scCO₂ injection (CCI), water alternating with scCO₂ injection (WAG), and simultaneous water and scCO₂ injection (SAI)—affect the wettability of gray Berea sandstone and Indiana limestone, both selected for their homogeneous properties relevant to CCS. Using a standardized sessile drop contact angle method before and after CO₂ injection, along with core flooding to model the injection process at an injection pressure of 1500 psi and temperature of 100 °F with a confining pressure of 2500 psi, the results indicate a shift in wettability towards more CO₂-wet conditions for both rock types under all strategies with changes in CA of 61.6–83.4° and 77.6–87.9° and 81.5–124.2° and 94.6–128.0° for sandstone and limestone, respectively. However, the degree of change varies depending on the injection strategy: sandstone exhibits a pronounced response to the CCI strategy, with up to a 77% increase in contact angle (CA), particularly after extended exposure. At the same time, WAG shows the least change, suggesting that water introduction slows surface modification. For limestone, the changes in CA ranged from 9% to 49% across strategies, with WAG and SAI being more effective in altering its wettability. This study underscores the importance of selecting suitable CO₂ injection strategies based on rock type and wettability characteristics to maximize carbon storage efficiency. The findings offer valuable insights into the complex interactions of fluid–rock systems and a guide for enhancing the design and implementation of CCS technologies in various geological settings.