Background and objectives: FSGS recurrence after kidney transplantation is a major risk factor for graft loss. However, the natural history, clinical predictors, and response to treatment remain unclear because of small sample sizes and poor generalizability of single-center studies, and disease misclassification in registry-based studies. We therefore aimed to determine the incidence, predictors, and treatment response of recurrent FSGS in a large cohort of kidney transplant recipients. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: The Post-Transplant Glomerular Disease (TANGO) project is an observational, multicenter, international cohort study that aims to investigate glomerular disease recurrence post-transplantation. Transplant recipients were screened for the diagnosis of idiopathic FSGS between 2005 and 2015 and details were recorded about the transplant, clinical outcomes, treatments, and other risk factors. Results: Among 11,742 kidney transplant recipients screened for FSGS, 176 had a diagnosis of idiopathic FSGS and were included. FSGS recurred in 57 patients (32%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 25% to 39%) and 39% of them lost their graft over a median of 5 (interquartile range, 3.0–8.1) years. Multivariable Cox regression revealed a higher risk for recurrence with older age at native kidney disease onset (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37 per decade; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.56). Other predictors were white race (HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.08 to 4.22), body mass index at transplant (HR, 0.89 per kg/m²; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.95), and native kidney nephrectomies (HR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.16 to 6.57). Plasmapheresis and rituximab were the most frequent treatments (81%). Partial or complete remission occurred in 57% of patients and was associated with better graft survival. Conclusions: Idiopathic FSGS recurs post-transplant in one third of cases and is associated with a five-fold higher risk of graft loss. Response to treatment is associated with significantly better outcomes but is achieved in only half of the cases.

Background and objectives: In patients with kidney failure due to IgA nephropathy, IgA deposits can recur in a subsequent kidney transplant. The incidence, effect, and risk factors of IgA nephropathy recurrence is unclear, because most studies have been single center and sample sizes are relatively small. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: We performed a multicenter, international, retrospective study to determine the incidence, risk factors, and treatment response of recurrent IgA nephropathy after kidney transplantation. Data were collected from all consecutive patients with biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy transplanted between 2005 and 2015, across 16 “The Post-Transplant Glomerular Disease” study centers in Europe, North America, and South America. Results: Out of 504 transplant recipients with IgA nephropathy, recurrent IgA deposits were identified by kidney biopsy in 82 patients; cumulative incidence of recurrence was 23% at 15 years (95% confidence interval, 14 to 34). Multivariable Cox regression revealed a higher risk for recurrence of IgA deposits in patients with a pre-emptive kidney transplant (hazard ratio, 3.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.31 to 9.17) and in patients with preformed donor-specific antibodies (hazard ratio, 2.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 6.19). After kidney transplantation, development of de novo donor-specific antibodies was associated with subsequent higher risk of recurrence of IgA nephropathy (hazard ratio, 6.65; 95% confidence interval, 3.33 to 13.27). Immunosuppressive regimen was not associated with recurrent IgA nephropathy in multivariable analysis, including steroid use. Graft loss was higher in patients with recurrence of IgA nephropathy compared with patients without (hazard ratio, 3.69; 95% confidence interval, 2.04 to 6.66), resulting in 32% (95% confidence interval, 50 to 82) graft loss at 8 years after diagnosis of recurrence. Conclusions: In our international cohort, cumulative risk of IgA nephropathy recurrence increased after transplant and was associated with a 3.7-fold greater risk of graft loss.

Isolated microvascular inflammation (iMVI) without HLA donor-specific antibodies or C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries remains an enigmatic phenotype that cannot be categorized as antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in recent Banff classifications. We included 221 kidney transplant recipients with biopsies with ABMR (n = 73), iMVI (n = 32), and normal (n = 116) diagnoses. We compared peripheral blood leukocyte distribution by flow cytometry and inflammatory infiltrates in kidney transplant biopsies among groups. Flow cytometry showed fewer lymphocytes and total, CD4⁺, and CD8⁺ peripheral T cells in iMVI compared with ABMR and normal cases. ABMR and iMVI had fewer total natural Killer (NK) cells but more NKG2A⁺ NK cells. Immunohistochemistry indicated that ABMR and iMVI had greater CD3⁺ and CD68⁺ glomerular infiltration than normal biopsies, whereas CD8⁺ and TIA1⁺ cells showed only increased iMVI, suggesting they are cytotoxic T cells. Peritubular capillaries displayed more CD3⁺, CD56⁺, TIA1⁺, and CD68⁺ cells in both ABMR and iMVI. In contrast, iMVI had less plasma cell infiltration in peritubular capillaries and interstitial aggregates than ABMR. iMVI displayed decreased circulating T and NK cells mirrored by T cell and NK cell infiltration in the renal allograft, similar to ABMR. However, the lesser plasma cell infiltration in iMVI may suggest an antibody-independent underlying stimulus.

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a leading cause of kidney failure worldwide, and frequently recurs after transplant. Available data originated from small retrospective cohort studies or registry analyses. Therefore, uncertainties remain on risk factors for MN recurrence and response to therapy. Within the Post-Transplant Glomerular Disease (TANGO) Consortium, we conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study examining the MN recurrence rate, risk factors, and response to treatment. This study screened 22,921 patients across three continents and included 194 patients who underwent a kidney transplant due to biopsy-proven MN. The cumulative incidence of MN recurrence was 31% at 10 years post-transplant. Patients with a faster progression towards end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) were at higher risk of developing recurrent MN (hazard ratio (HR) of 0.55 per decade (95%CI; 0.35-0.88). Moreover, elevated pre-transplant levels of anti-PLA2R antibodies were strongly associated with recurrence (HR 18.58; 95%CI; 5.37- 64.27). Patients receiving rituximab for MN recurrence had a higher likelihood of achieving remission than patients receiving RAAS inhibition alone. In sum, MN recurs in one-third of patients post-transplant and serum PLA2R antibodies shortly before transplant could aid in risk-stratifying patients for MN recurrence. Moreover, patients receiving rituximab had a higher rate of treatment response.

Frailty is associated with poorer outcomes among patients waiting for kidney transplantation (KT). Several different tools to measure frailty have been used; however, their predictive value is unknown. This is a prospective longitudinal study of 449 KT candidates evaluated for frailty by the Physical Frailty Phenotype (PFP) and the FRAIL scale. During the study period, 296 patients received a KT, while 153 remained listed. Patients who did not get receive a transplant were more frequently frail according to PFP (16.3 vs. 7.4%, p = 0.013). Robust patients had fewer hospital admissions during the 1st year after listing (20.8% if PFP = 0 vs. 43.4% if ≥1, and 27.1% if FRAIL = 0 vs. 48.9% if ≥1) and fewer cardiovascular events (than FRAIL ≥ 1) or major infectious events (than PFP ≥ 1). According to PFP, scoring 1 point had an impact on patient survival and chance of transplantation in the univariate analysis. The multivariable analysis corroborated the result, as candidates with PFP ≥ 3 had less likelihood of transplantation (HR 0.45 [0.26–0.77]). The FRAIL scale did not associate with any of these outcomes. In KT candidates, pre-frailty and frailty according to both the PFP and the FRAIL scale were associated with poorer results while listed. The PFP detected that frail patients were less likely to receive a KT, while the FRAIL scale did not.