The circular economy (CE), as an antidote to the ubiquitous and dominant global economic concept characterized by the uncontrolled exploitation of natural resources and the flow of materials from producers to users to landfills, has become inevitable. The application of circular business models is especially needed in the building sector, as one of the main consumers of natural resources and energy, considerable polluters, and substantial producers of waste. Since architects are important participants in the process of designing and building structures, it is clear that circular principles should be incorporated into architectural design (AD) as well. This paper deals with the analysis of the degree of application of circular principles in AD in Serbia and the challenges and difficulties that architects face in this endeavor. The methods used in the research included an unstructured interview on the basic principles of CE, a case study of selected housing renovation projects in Niš, Serbia (as an illustration of the principles that deal with extending the life of buildings in the domestic environment), and a survey on the degree and importance of the application of the CE principles in AD among architects in Serbia. The case study results and survey results led to the outline of guidelines for future AD in accordance with CE principles and recommendations for creating a working environment for the architects that is more circular oriented.

Relations among neighbors are a key indicator of the strength of a local social community, contribute to social cohesion and are an important factor in achieving a higher level of social sustainability. On the other hand, the environment in which people live plays an important role in encouraging social contacts and developing relationships between people. In order to establish social interactions between neighbors within a multifamily apartment building (MFAB), it is necessary to provide adequate spaces for communication between residents. This was especially emphasized during the mobility restrictions caused by COVID-19, although this necessity is permanent. This paper analyzes the influence of the physical characteristics of common spaces in MFABs on the quality and intensity of contacts among residents of MFABs in the City of Niš, Serbia. In order to determine the current quality of these spaces as a physical framework for interactions among residents and to identify the wishes of users regarding interactions with neighbors in these spaces before and during COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, a survey was conducted. The analysis of the survey results and numerous examples of housing design led to (1) the formation of guidelines for future designs of MFABs and (2) recommendations for redefining the standards regulating the field of housing construction in the region, both applicable during the period of the pandemic and after it.

Although single-family housing in the city is considered higher quality and preferred type of housing, housing crisis, as a permanent actual problem in the world, requires adequate solutions. In this sense, housing in multi-family housing buildings can be considered as a necessity (social, moral, economic, etc.), but in fact, now and in the future, it is the main form of housing construction which can give the solution for housing problems. However, to make this housing type more attractive and acceptable to the occupants, it is necessary to improve it by the implementation of individualization modalities, and in that way make its qualities much closer to the preferred single-family housing.

Over the past five years, generative AI has carved out a major role in architecture, especially in education and visual idea generation. Most of the time, the literature talks about AI as a tool, an assistant, or sometimes a co-creator, always highlighting efficiency and the end product in architectural design. There is a steady rise in empirical studies, yet the real impact on how young architects learn still lacks a solid theory behind it. In this systematic review, we dig into peer-reviewed work from 2015 to 2025, looking at how generative AI fits into architectural design education. Using PRISMA guidelines, we pull together findings from 40 papers across architecture, design studies, human–computer interaction and educational research. What stands out is a clear tension: on one hand, students crank out more creative work; on the other, their reflective engagement drops, especially when AI steps in as a replacement during early ideation instead of working alongside them. To address this, we introduce the idea of “AI sparring”. Here, generative AI is not just a helper—it becomes a provocateur, pushing students to think critically and develop stronger architectural concepts. Our review offers new ways to interpret AI’s role, moving beyond seeing it just as a productivity booster. Instead, we argue for AI as an active, reflective partner in education, and we lay out practical recommendations for studio-based teaching and future research. This paper is a theoretical review and conceptual proposal, and we urge future studies to test these ideas in practice.