This study focuses on genetically stratified subgroups of Parkinson’s disease patients (PD) with an enrichment of risk variants in mitochondrial genes,who might benefit from treatment with the “mitochondrial enhancer” coenzyme Q10 (156 mg coenzyme Q10/d [QuinoMit Q10® Fluid] over six months). The study will be performed in a double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled parallel group manner. PD patients will be specifically identified and assigned to treatment groups stratified by their genetic “mitochondrial risk burden” and consequently expected mitochondrial dysfunction and treatment response to coenzyme Q10 (homozygous or compound heterozygous Parkin/PINK1 mutation carriers [P++], heterozygous Parkin/PINK1 mutation carriers [P+], “omics” positive [omics+], and “omics” negative PD patients [omics-]). The primary endpoint is the change in motor symptoms over six months (as measured by the change in the motor subscore of the MDS-UPDRS). Secondary clinical endpoints include motor fluctuations, non-motor symptoms, results of magnetic resonance imaging of brain energy metabolism (31P-magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging), and changes in structural and functional brain anatomy (MRI). This study may be a first step towards a successful prediction of treatment response based on the genetic status of PD patients and translate progress in molecular genetics into personalized patient care. Further, magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging may help quantify increased energy supply objectively and within a brief time after the start of treatment. Therefore, the potential of MRSI also for other studies addressing brain energy metabolism may will be assessed. This study was registered at the German Clinical Trial Registry (DRKS, DRKS00015880 ) on November 15th, 2018.
Background: Mitochondrial dysfunction has been identified as a pathophysiological hallmark of disease onset and progression in patients with Parkinsonian disorders. Besides the overall emergence of gene therapies in treating these patients, this highly relevant molecular concept has not yet been defined as a target for gene therapeutic approaches. Methods: This narrative review will discuss the experimental evidence suggesting mitochondrial dysfunction as a viable treatment target in patients with monogenic and idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. In addition, we will focus on general treatment strategies and crucial challenges which need to be overcome. Results: Our current understanding of mitochondrial biology in parkinsonian disorders opens up the avenue for viable treatment strategies in Parkinsonian disorders. Insights can be obtained from primary mitochondrial diseases. However, substantial knowledge gaps and unique challenges of mitochondria-targeted gene therapies need to be addressed to provide innovative treatments in the future. Conclusions: Mitochondria-targeted gene therapies are a potential strategy to improve an important primary disease mechanism in Parkinsonian disorders. However, further studies are needed to address the unique design challenges for mitochondria-targeted gene therapies.
There is a pressing need for disease-modifying therapies in patients suffering from neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, these disorders face unique challenges in clinical trial designs to assess the neuroprotective properties of potential drug candidates. One of these challenges relates to the often unknown individual disease mechanisms that would, however, be relevant for targeted treatment strategies. Neuroinflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction are two proposed pathophysiological hallmarks and are considered to be highly interconnected in PD. Innovative neuroimaging methods can potentially help to gain deeper insights into one’s predominant disease mechanisms, can facilitate patient stratification in clinical trials, and could potentially map treatment responses. This review aims to highlight the role of neuroinflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction in patients with PD (PwPD). We will specifically introduce different neuroimaging modalities, their respective technical hurdles and challenges, and their implementation into clinical practice. We will gather preliminary evidence for their potential use in PD research and discuss opportunities for future clinical trials.
Pathogenic variants in PRKN cause early‐onset Parkinson's disease (PD), while the role of alpha‐synuclein in PRKN‐PD remains uncertain. One study performed a blood‐based alpha‐synuclein seed amplification assay (SAA) in PRKN‐PD, not detecting seed amplification in 17 PRKN‐PD patients. By applying a methodologically different SAA focusing on neuron‐derived extracellular vesicles, we demonstrated alpha‐synuclein seed amplification in 8 of 13 PRKN‐PD patients, challenging the view of PRKN‐PD as a non‐synucleinopathy. Moreover, we performed blinded replication of the neuron‐derived extracellular vesicles‐dependent SAA in idiopathic PD patients and healthy controls. In conclusion, blood‐based neuron‐derived extracellular vesicles‐dependent SAA represents a promising biomarker to elucidate the underpinnings of (monogenic) PD. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:1173–1177
Mitochondrial dysfunction is a pathophysiological hallmark of most neurodegenerative diseases. Several clinical trials targeting mitochondrial dysfunction have been performed with conflicting results. Reliable biomarkers of mitochondrial dysfunction in vivo are thus needed to optimize future clinical trial designs. This narrative review highlights various neuroimaging methods to probe mitochondrial dysfunction. We provide a general overview of the current biological understanding of mitochondrial dysfunction in degenerative brain disorders and how distinct neuroimaging methods can be employed to map disease-related changes. The reviewed methodological spectrum includes positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and near-infrared spectroscopy imaging, and how these methods can be applied to study alterations in oxidative phosphorylation and oxidative stress. We highlight the advantages and shortcomings of the different neuroimaging methods and discuss the necessary steps to use these for future research. This review stresses the importance of neuroimaging methods to gain deepened insights into mitochondrial dysfunction in vivo, its role as a critical disease mechanism in neurodegenerative diseases, the applicability for patient stratification in interventional trials, and the quantification of individual treatment responses. The in vivo assessment of mitochondrial dysfunction is a crucial prerequisite for providing individualized treatments for neurodegenerative disorders.