Chrysanthi Sardeli

Prof. Dr. Chrysanthi Sardeli

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 September 2011 in Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MCMichael Chourdakis
Michael Chourdakis
MKMichaela M. Kraus
Michaela M. Kraus
TTThrasivoulos Tzellos
Thrasivoulos Tzellos
CSChrysanthi Sardeli
Chrysanthi Sardeli
MPMaria Peftoulidou
Maria Peftoulidou
DKDimitrios Kouvelas
Dimitrios Kouvelas

17 August 2019 in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ITIoannis Tsakiridis
Ioannis Tsakiridis
VBVasiliki Bousi
Vasiliki Bousi
Themistoklis DagklisThemistoklis Dagklis
Themistoklis Dagklis
CSChrysanthi Sardeli
Chrysanthi Sardeli
VNVasiliki Nikolopoulou
Vasiliki Nikolopoulou
Georgios PapazisisGeorgios Papazisis
Georgios Papazisis

1 October 2009 in Current Pharmaceutical Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DKDimitrios Kouvelas
Dimitrios Kouvelas
AGA. Goulas
A. Goulas
Georgios PapazisisGeorgios Papazisis
Georgios Papazisis
CSChrysanthi Sardeli
Chrysanthi Sardeli
CPC. Pourzitaki
C. Pourzitaki
PDE5 inhibitors have been clearly established as first-line therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Three PDE5 inhibitors – sildenafil (Viagra®), vardenafil (Levitra®) and tadalafil (Cialis®) - are currently approved by the FDA and the EMEA for use in ED, whereas sildenafil is also marketed under a different proprietary name (Revatio®) for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). A forth PDE5 inhibitor, udenafil (Zydena®), is currently marketed. In the present review the molecular basis and the mechanism of action of PDE5 inhibitors is discussed. In addition experimental and clinical data concerning their effects on different tissues, organs and systems is systematically reviewed and their possible beneficial action in numerous disorders is presented.

6 February 2011 in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TTTg Tzellos
Tg Tzellos
CSChrysanthi Sardeli
Chrysanthi Sardeli
ALA Lallas
A Lallas
Georgios PapazisisGeorgios Papazisis
Georgios Papazisis
MCMichael Chourdakis
Michael Chourdakis
DKDimitrios Kouvelas
Dimitrios Kouvelas

23 February 2017 in Metabolites
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GGGeorgios Gkotsos
Georgios Gkotsos
CVChristina Virgiliou
Christina Virgiliou
ILIoanna Lagoudaki
Ioanna Lagoudaki
CSChrysanthi Sardeli
Chrysanthi Sardeli
Nikolaos RaikosNikolaos Raikos
Nikolaos Raikos
GDGeorgios Dimitriadis
Georgios Dimitriadis
The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate sarcosine, uracil, and kynurenic acid in urine as potential biomarkers in prostate cancer detection and progression monitoring. Sarcosine, uracil, and kynurenic acid were measured in urine samples of 32 prostate cancer patients prior to radical prostatectomy, 101 patients with increased prostate-specific antigen prior to ultrasonographically-guided prostatic biopsy collected before and after prostatic massage, and 15 healthy volunteers (controls). The results were related to histopathologic data, Gleason score, and PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen). Metabolites were measured after analysis of urine samples with Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) instrumentation. Multivariate, nonparametric statistical tests including receiver operating characteristics analyses, one-way analysis of variance (Kruskal–Wallis test), parametric statistical analysis, and Pearson correlation, were performed to evaluate diagnostic performance. Decreased median sarcosine and kynurenic acid and increased uracil concentrations were observed for patients with prostate cancer compared to participants without malignancy. Results showed that there was no correlation between the concentration of the studied metabolites and the cancer grade (Gleason score <7 vs. ≥7) and the age of the patients. Evaluation of biomarkers by ROC (Receiving Operating Characteristics) curve analysis showed that differentiation of prostate cancer patients from participants without malignancy was not enhanced by sarcosine or uracil levels in urine. In contrast to total PSA values, kynurenic acid was found a promising biomarker for the detection of prostate cancer particularly in cases where collection of urine samples was performed after prostatic massage. Sarcosine and uracil in urine samples of patients with prostate cancer were not found as significant biomarkers for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. None of the three metabolites can be used reliably for monitoring the progress of the disease.

1 January 2008 in Pharmacological Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Georgios PapazisisGeorgios Papazisis
Georgios Papazisis
CPChryssa Pourzitaki
Chryssa Pourzitaki
CSChrysanthi Sardeli
Chrysanthi Sardeli
Aimilios LallasAimilios Lallas
Aimilios Lallas
EAEkaterini Amaniti
Ekaterini Amaniti
DKDimitrios Kouvelas
Dimitrios Kouvelas