Hiccups are sudden, repeated, and involuntary contractions of the diaphragm muscle (myoclonic contraction). It involves a reflex arc that, once activated, causes a strong contraction of the diaphragm immediately followed by the closure of the glottis translating into the classic hic sound. Hiccups can be short, persistent, and intractable depending on the duration. The most disabling hiccups often represent the epiphenomenon of a medical condition such as gastrointestinal and cardiovascular disorders; central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities; ear, nose, and throat (ENT) conditions or pneumological problems; metabolic/endocrine disorders; infections; and psychogenic disorders. Some drugs, such as aripiprazole, a second-generation antipsychotic, can induce the onset of variable hiccups. We describe herein the cases of three hospitalized patients who developed insistent hiccups after taking aripiprazole and who positively responded to low doses of gabapentin. It is probable that aripiprazole, prescribed at a low dosage (7.5mg/day), would act as a dopamine agonist by stimulating D₂ and D₃ receptors at the hiccup center levellocated in the brain stemthus triggering the hiccup. On the other hand, gabapentin led to a complete regression of the hiccup probably by reducing the nerve impulse transmission and modulating the diaphragmatic activity. The present case series suggests the use of low doses of gabapentin as an effective treatment for aripiprazole-induced hiccups. However, our knowledge of the neurotransmitter functioning of the hiccup reflex arc is still limited, and further research is needed to characterize the neurotransmitters involved in hiccups for potential novel therapeutic targets.

(1) Background: To systematically review evidence on the safety and efficacy of psychopharmacological treatments available for psychomotor agitation (PA) in children and adolescents. (2) Methods: Studies assessing the safety and efficacy of psychopharmacological treatments for acute PA in children and adolescents that were published between January 1984 and June 2022 on PubMed were systematically reviewed. We included: (i) papers that presented a combination of the search terms specified in the “Search strategy” sub-paragraph; (ii) manuscripts in English; (iii) original papers; (iv) prospective or retrospective/observational studies and experimental or quasi-experimental reports. The exclusion criteria were: (i) review papers; (ii) non-original studies including editorials and book reviews; (iii) studies not specifically designed and focused on the selected topic. (3) Results: We selected 42 papers: 11 case series (11/42, 26.19%), 8 chart reviews (8/42, 19.05%), 8 case reports (8/42, 19.05%), 6 double-blind placebo-controlled randomized studies (6/42, 14.29%), 4 double-blind controlled randomized studies (4/42, 9.52%), 4 open-label trials (4/42, 9.52%) and 1 case control (1/42, 2.38%). (4) Conclusions: The drugs most frequently used to treat agitation in children and adolescents were ziprasidone, risperidone, aripiprazole, olanzapine and valproic acid. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy/safety ratio, considering the limited number of observations in this field.

To explore the demographic and clinical features of severe catatonic patients, comparing responders and non-responders to ECT in order to detect possible predictors of non-response.This naturalisti...

Background: Chronic cocaine exposure is increasingly associated with persistent brain alterations, yet it remains unclear whether these changes reflect reversible neuroadaptation, accelerated brain ageing, or a degeneration-like trajectory in a vulnerable subgroup. This Perspective proposes a neuroprogressive vulnerability framework—referred to as cocaine-specific encephalopathy/cerebropathy only in a heuristic sense—to organise heterogeneous evidence without implying a distinct neurodegenerative disease entity. Methods: We conducted a structured, critical synthesis of peer-reviewed human and preclinical literature (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science; inception to December 2025), integrating neuroimaging (MRI/DTI/fMRI/PET/SPECT), neuropathology/post-mortem findings, neurochemical and molecular mechanisms, and neuropsychological outcomes, with explicit attention to confounders (polysubstance use, psychiatric and medical comorbidity, HIV, vascular risk, abstinence duration). Results: Convergent evidence supports a multi-hit vulnerability model in which chronic stimulant exposure may weaken neural resilience through dopaminergic dysregulation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, neuroinflammatory signalling, and putative α-synuclein–related mechanisms. Human imaging studies consistently implicate fronto–striato–limbic circuits and suggest possible cerebellar involvement, but findings are heterogeneous and often cross-sectional; direct evidence of progressive neuronal loss or disease-defining proteinopathies attributable to cocaine remains limited. Conclusions: Rather than asserting cocaine-induced classic neurodegeneration, we outline an exploratory framework in which chronic cocaine exposure may increase susceptibility to neuroprogressive impairment in a subset of biologically vulnerable individuals. Longitudinal multimodal studies combining advanced imaging, biomarkers, and phenotypic stratification are needed to clarify causality, temporal progression, and reversibility with sustained abstinence.